The Role of Standards in Product Lifecycle Management Support

A major challenge of any product engineering project is to support the creation, exchange, management and archival of information about product, process, people and services across the networked and extended enterprise covering the entire product lifecycle spectrum. An information support system for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) requires a move from product data exchange to product information and knowledge exchange across different disciplines and domains. PLM support systems will need to have both syntactic and semantic interoperability of computer systems and people through well defined standards. We begin this paper with a model of communication between two agents and then extend this model to describe the information flows in PLM so as to serve as the basis for understanding the role of standards for PLM support systems. Support of PLM requires a set of complementary and interoperable standards that cover the various aspects of PLM. We identify an initial typology of standards relevant to PLM support. The typology primarily addresses the hierarchy of existing and evolving standards and their usage. The typology identifies a suite of complementary standards supporting the exchange of product, process, operations and supply chain information. Given the nature of the task of developing and deploying a set of standards for PLM support systems, we argue that open standards with wide participation are the key to their realization.

[1]  L. Flower,et al.  Reading-to-Write: Exploring a Cognitive and Social Process , 1990 .

[2]  A. Barbosa‐Póvoa Supply chain , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM).

[3]  Conrad E. Bock,et al.  Systems engineering in the product lifecycle , 2005 .

[4]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  The Toyota way : 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer , 2004 .

[5]  陳煥文 世界智慧財產權組織[The World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO] 仲裁規則評釋 , 1996 .

[6]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  Web Ontology Language: OWL , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[7]  Sheila A. Martin,et al.  Interoperability Cost Analysis of the U.S. Automotive Supply Chain , 1999 .

[8]  Sharon J. Kemmerer,et al.  STEP: The Grand Experience , 1999 .

[9]  Bruce Gregory,et al.  Inventing Reality: Physics as Language , 1988 .

[10]  Ken Krechmer,et al.  Open Standards Requirements , 2006, Int. J. IT Stand. Stand. Res..

[11]  강문설 [서평]「The Unified Modeling Language User Guide」 , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[13]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture , 1992, IBM Syst. J..

[14]  Steven Weber,et al.  The Success of Open Source , 2004 .

[15]  Thomas Gulledge,et al.  Product lifecycle management for the US army weapon systems acquisition , 2005 .

[16]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  The "global" and the "local" in knowledge management , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[17]  Douglas A. Schenck,et al.  Information modeling: the EXPRESS way , 1994 .

[18]  Michael Yu Wang,et al.  A level-set based variational method for design and optimization of heterogeneous objects , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[19]  Dallas E. Webster Mapping the design information representation terrain , 1988, Computer.

[20]  Ccsds Secretariat,et al.  Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS) , 1999 .

[21]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[22]  JOSEPH ZILBER,et al.  issue 1 , 2020, JORDANIAN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES (JJECI).

[23]  P. Kidwell,et al.  The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering , 1996, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing.

[24]  Raymonde Guindon Designing the design process: exploiting opportunistic thoughts , 1990 .

[25]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[26]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[27]  A. Valle,et al.  Diffusion of nuclear energy in some developing countries , 2014 .

[28]  Anna van Raaphorst RDF (Resource Description Framework) , 2006 .

[29]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  The Role of Standards in Innovation , 2000 .

[30]  P. David,et al.  Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society , 2003 .

[31]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Mythical Man-Month: Essays on Softw , 1978 .

[32]  Russell S. Peak,et al.  STEP, XML, and UML: Complementary Technologies , 2004 .

[33]  Vijay Srinivasan A geometrical product specification language based on a classification of symmetry groups , 1999, Comput. Aided Des..

[34]  Peter Denno,et al.  Requirements on information technology for product lifecycle management , 2004 .

[35]  付伶俐 打磨Using Language,倡导新理念 , 2014 .

[36]  Chun Liu,et al.  Establishment of functional relationships between product components in assembly database , 1988 .

[37]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Concurrent design happens at the interfaces , 1995, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[38]  Carolyn Deere Birkbeck World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) , 2001, World Trade and Arbitration Materials.

[39]  Ken Krechmer The Meaning of Open Standards , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[40]  Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden,et al.  Service , 2018, Wirtschaftsinformatik Manag..

[41]  Alexander Galloway,et al.  Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization , 2001 .

[42]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Commonsense-based interfaces , 2000, CACM.

[43]  Sergio Terzi,et al.  Elements of Product Lifecycle Management: Definitions, Open Issues and Reference Models , 2005 .

[44]  T. J. Allen,et al.  CAD system use and engineering performance , 1993 .