Transient climate–carbon simulations of planetary geoengineering

Geoengineering (the intentional modification of Earth's climate) has been proposed as a means of reducing CO2-induced climate warming while greenhouse gas emissions continue. Most proposals involve managing incoming solar radiation such that future greenhouse gas forcing is counteracted by reduced solar forcing. In this study, we assess the transient climate response to geoengineering under a business-as-usual CO2 emissions scenario by using an intermediate-complexity global climate model that includes an interactive carbon cycle. We find that the climate system responds quickly to artificially reduced insolation; hence, there may be little cost to delaying the deployment of geoengineering strategies until such a time as “dangerous” climate change is imminent. Spatial temperature patterns in the geoengineered simulation are comparable with preindustrial temperatures, although this is not true for precipitation. Carbon sinks in the model increase in response to geoengineering. Because geoengineering acts to mask climate warming, there is a direct CO2-driven increase in carbon uptake without an offsetting temperature-driven suppression of carbon sinks. However, this strengthening of carbon sinks, combined with the potential for rapid climate adjustment to changes in solar forcing, leads to serious consequences should geoengineering fail or be stopped abruptly. Such a scenario could lead to very rapid climate change, with warming rates up to 20 times greater than present-day rates. This warming rebound would be larger and more sustained should climate sensitivity prove to be higher than expected. Thus, employing geoengineering schemes with continued carbon emissions could lead to severe risks for the global climate system.

[1]  Andrei P. Sokolov,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Estimated PDFs of Climate System Properties Including Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings , 2005 .

[2]  Philip B. Duffy,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the terrestrial biosphere , 2002 .

[3]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Earth systems engineering and management , 2001, Nature.

[4]  P. Crutzen.  Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[5]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[6]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[7]  Wilfrid Bach,et al.  Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming , 1992 .

[8]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[9]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[10]  Katrin J. Meissner,et al.  The role of land surface dynamics in glacial inception: a study with the UVic Earth System Model , 2003 .

[11]  R. Betts,et al.  Detection of a direct carbon dioxide effect in continental river runoff records , 2006, Nature.

[12]  Jianping Mao,et al.  The Volcanic Signal in Surface Temperature Observations. , 1995 .

[13]  J. Hansen,et al.  A slippery slope: How much global warming constitutes “dangerous anthropogenic interference”? , 2005 .

[14]  J. Jouzel,et al.  Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core, Antarctica , 1999, Nature.

[15]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios , 2000 .

[16]  A. Weaver,et al.  Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Dynamics under Recent and Future Climate Change , 2005 .

[17]  Marika M. Holland,et al.  The UVic earth system climate model: Model description, climatology, and applications to past, present and future climates , 2001, Data, Models and Analysis.

[18]  J. Tison,et al.  One-to-one coupling of glacial climate variability in Greenland and Antarctica. , 2006 .