Dimensions of Online Behavior: Toward a User Typology

Online behavior refers to organized (e.g., search) and unorganized (e.g., browse) interactions with both human (e.g., chat) and nonhuman (e.g., database) elements in online environments. The salient features of online behavior are conceptualized as sociability (human connection motives), utility (efficiency orientation), and reciprocity (cognitive stimulation and active involvement). Recently published factor analytic studies support the validity of these three dimensions of online behavior. The proposed Brief Test of Online Behavior (BTOB) contains five rating scale items that determine user position on each dimension of online behavior (i.e., 15 items in total). A typology of online behavior emerges as BTOB scores position users in the three-dimensional space created by the intersection of sociability, utility, and reciprocity. Subsequent research may validate the proposed dimensions of online behavior, establish practical applications of the BTOB, and connect type of user with cognitive, social, and emotional outcomes. For example, users who score high on sociability and reciprocity but low on utility may learn best in interactive and stimulating online environments, which necessarily include self-regulating software.

[1]  Dan J Stein,et al.  Problematic internet use: Proposed classification and diagnostic criteria , 2003, Depression and anxiety.

[2]  Genevieve Marie Johnson.  College Student Internet Use: Convenience and Amusement , 2007 .

[3]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design , 2009 .

[4]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet Use, Interpersonal Relations, and Sociability: A Time Diary Study , 2008 .

[5]  S. Herring.  Computer‐Mediated Discourse , 2005 .

[6]  Genevieve Marie Johnson,et al.  Student Alienation, Academic Achievement, and WebCT Use , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  T. Brown,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2006 .

[8]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[9]  Stephen T. Kerr.  Why we all want it to work: towards a culturally based model for technology and educational change , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  A. Joinson.  Understanding the Psychology of Internet Behaviour: Virtual Worlds, Real Lives , 2002 .

[11]  Sarah A. Birnie,et al.  Psychological Predictors of Internet Social Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  What Products Can Be Successfully Promoted and Sold Via the Internet? , 2002, Journal of Advertising Research.

[13]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Social Interactions and the 'Digital Divide': Explaining Regional Variations in Internet Use , 2005 .

[14]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  Dimensions of Interactivity: Differential Effects of Social and Psychological Factors , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  Dorit Tubin,et al.  Typology of ICT Implementation and Technology Applications , 2006 .

[16]  J. Day,et al.  Computer and Internet Use in the United States: 2003 , 2005 .

[17]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  The effects of need for cognition on Internet use , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  G. Johnson.  Learning Style under Two Web‐Based Study Conditions , 2007 .

[19]  Ahmed Y. Mahfouz,et al.  Use of Internet Pornography and Men’s Well-Being , 2005 .

[20]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  A multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community , 2005, TCHI.

[21]  R. LaRose,et al.  A Social Cognitive Theory of Internet Uses and Gratifications: Toward a New Model of Media Attendance , 2004 .

[22]  Meyer Friedman,et al.  Type A Behavior: Its Diagnosis and Treatment , 1996, Prevention in Practice Library.

[23]  S. Herring.  Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis : An Approach to Researching Online Behavior , 2004 .

[24]  Phil Wood.  Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research , 2008 .

[25]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .

[26]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  The Insiders' Perspectives: A Focus Group Study on Gender Issues in a Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environment , 2005, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[27]  Genevieve Marie Johnson.  Perception of classroom climate, use of WebCT, and academic achievement , 2006, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[28]  James H. Gray,et al.  Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning: COMING TO TERMS WITH COMMUNITY , 2004 .