Consent to Sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form: is it understandable?

INTRODUCTION We sought to assess readability and comprehension characteristics of the Consent to Sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form (Title XIX-SCF) in order to determine if it was likely providing informed consent to the Medicaid population. MATERIALS AND METHODS The current Title XIX-SCF was evaluated using the Readability and Processability Form (RPF). The RPF, designed to assess the format of informed consent documents, assigns points to each of 20 areas of comprehension analysis according to established scoring criteria. Finally, a modified Title XIX-SCF was developed and evaluated using the RPF. RESULTS The overall RPF score for the current Title XIX-SCF was in the "poor" range (total=37), while the Fry reading level was at the ninth grade. The modified Title XIX-SCF scored in the "excellent" range (total=92), while the Fry reading level was at the sixth grade. CONCLUSIONS The readability and comprehension demands of the current Title XIX-SCF exceed recommended guidelines for patient education and informed consent materials. The current Title XIX-SCF should be revised to ensure that women understand, desire and consent to permanent sterilization.

[1]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: effects on parents' understanding. , 2005, Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.

[2]  Edward B. Fry,et al.  Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, Validity, and Extension to Level 17. , 1977 .

[3]  Michael K Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Gribble,et al.  Informed consent documents for BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening: how large is the readability gap? , 1999, Patient education and counseling.

[5]  David A. Kindig,et al.  Health literacy : a prescription to end confusion , 2004 .

[6]  K. Hopper,et al.  The readability of currently used surgical/procedure consent forms in the United States. , 1998, Surgery.

[7]  S. J. Philipson,et al.  Effectiveness of a writing improvement intervention program on the readability of the research informed consent document. , 1999, Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research.

[8]  S. Gabram,et al.  Informed consent for research: a study to evaluate readability and processability to effect change. , 1995, Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research.

[9]  William D Mosher,et al.  Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982-2002. , 2004, Advance data.

[10]  J. Culpepper National Center for Educational Statistics , 2007 .

[11]  L. G. Doak,et al.  Teaching Patients With Low Literacy Skills , 1985 .

[12]  Michael K. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  The prevalence of limited health literacy , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[13]  B. Weiss,et al.  Suitability of written supplemental materials available on the Internet for nonprescription medications. , 2006, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.