Disentangling positive and negative partisanship in social media interactions using a coevolving latent space network with attractors model

Summary . We develop a broadly applicable class of coevolving latent space network with attractors (CLSNA) models, where nodes represent individual social actors assumed to lie in an unknown latent space, edges represent the presence of a specified interaction between actors, and attractors are added in the latent level to capture the notion of attractive and repulsive forces. We apply the CLSNA models to understand the dynamics of partisan polarization on social media, where we expect Republicans and Democrats to increasingly interact with their own party and disengage with the opposing party. Using longitudinal social networks from the social media platforms Twitter and Reddit, we investigate the relative contributions of positive (attractive) and negative (repulsive) forces among political elites and the public, respectively. Our goals are to disentangle the positive and negative forces within and between parties and explore if and how they change over time. Our analysis confirms the existence of partisan polarization in social media interactions among both political elites and the public. Moreover, while positive partisanship is the driving force of interactions across the full periods of study for both the public and Democratic elites, negative partisanship has come to dominate Republican elites’ interactions since the run-up to the 2016 presidential election. 1-Democrats, 2-Republicans. These results indicate presence of edge persistence (ˆ δ > 0), higher within-group attraction for Democrats than Republicans (ˆ γ w 1 > ˆ γ w 2 (mean difference = .388, SE = .035)), presence of between-group repulsion (ˆ γ b < 0), and some evidence for greater magnitude of between-group repulsion than within-group attraction for Republicans ( | ˆ γ b | > | ˆ γ w 2 | (mean difference = .050, SE = .022)), the opposite for Democrats ( | ˆ γ b | < | ˆ γ w 1 | (mean difference = SE = Our has disentangled and quantified key aspects of polarization, positive and negative partisanship, well as a concept in social network theory, edge persistence. results show that for members of Congress active on Twitter polarization across the two decade. We also study the time-varying aspects of attraction, repulsion and edge persistence by fitting a change-point version of our model. Results show that for Republican members of Congress, disengagement other dominate with their own 2015, disengagement with their own find with out-group party strong in-group attachments. Reddit. positive partisanship full length of study for both limited support for the role of negative partisanship in polarization. the modeling and

[1]  J. Ramírez-Márquez,et al.  A Quantitative and Content-Based Approach for Evaluating the Impact of Counter Narratives on Affective Polarization in Online Discussions , 2022, IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems.

[2]  Nahema Marchal “Be Nice or Leave Me Alone”: An Intergroup Perspective on Affective Polarization in Online Political Discussions , 2021, Communication Research.

[3]  Yphtach Lelkes,et al.  The Nature of Affective Polarization: Disentangling Policy Disagreement from Partisan Identity , 2021 .

[4]  Ashton Anderson,et al.  Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms , 2020, Nature.

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  Bubble storytelling with automated animation: a Brexit hashtag activism case study , 2020, Journal of Visualization.

[6]  Pablo Barberá Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization , 2020, Social Media and Democracy.

[7]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Affective Polarization in Online Climate Change Discourse on Twitter , 2020, 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM).

[8]  Neta Kligler-Vilenchik,et al.  Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media , 2020, Political Communication.

[9]  Mehmet Gökay Özerim,et al.  Discussing the Populist Features of Anti-refugee Discourses on Social Media: An Anti-Syrian Hashtag in Turkish Twitter , 2020 .

[10]  T. Sweet,et al.  A Latent Space Network Model for Social Influence , 2020, Psychometrika.

[11]  Kevin Mentzer,et al.  Measuring and Unpacking Affective Polarization on Twitter: The Role of Party and Gender in the 2018 Senate Races , 2020, HICSS.

[12]  Kareem Darwish,et al.  Quantifying Polarization on Twitter: The Kavanaugh Nomination , 2019, SocInfo.

[13]  Farzana Masroor,et al.  Polarization and Ideological Weaving in Twitter Discourse of Politicians , 2019, Social Media + Society.

[14]  Dino P. Christenson,et al.  Bad characters or just more polarization? The rise of extremely negative feelings for presidential candidates , 2019, Electoral Studies.

[15]  Christopher M. Federico Prius or Pickup? How the Answers to Four Simple Questions Explain America's Great Divide by Marc Hetherington and Jonathan Weiler. Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2018. 289 pp. $28.00. , 2019, Political Science Quarterly.

[16]  Svetlana Bodrunova,et al.  Beyond Left and Right: Real-World Political Polarization in Twitter Discussions on Inter-Ethnic Conflicts , 2019, Media and Communication.

[17]  Axel Bruns,et al.  After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research , 2019, Information, Communication & Society.

[18]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  How Many People Live in Political Bubbles on Social Media? Evidence From Linked Survey and Twitter Data , 2019, SAGE Open.

[19]  Hillary C. Shulman,et al.  Does Having a Political Discussion Help or Hurt Intergroup Perceptions? Drawing Guidance From Social Identity Theory and the Contact Hypothesis , 2018 .

[20]  Jaime E. Settle Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America , 2018 .

[21]  John Ryan,et al.  Affective Polarization or Partisan Disdain?Untangling a Dislike for the Opposing Party from a Dislike of Partisanship , 2018 .

[22]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature , 2018 .

[23]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  Negative Partisanship: Why Americans Dislike Parties But Behave Like Rabid Partisans , 2018 .

[24]  Grant Blank,et al.  The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media , 2018 .

[25]  M. K. Chen,et al.  The effect of partisanship and political advertising on close family ties , 2017, Science.

[26]  Mark Strembeck,et al.  An Analysis of the Twitter Discussion on the 2016 Austrian Presidential Elections , 2017, Online Soc. Networks Media.

[27]  Flaviano Morone,et al.  Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella Polarization on Social Media , 2018 .

[29]  Jonathan Bright,et al.  Explaining the Emergence of Political Fragmentation on Social Media: The Role of Ideology and Extremism , 2018, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[30]  L. Stewart,et al.  Examining Trolls and Polarization with a Retweet Network , 2018 .

[31]  Lori D. Bougher The Correlates of Discord: Identity, Issue Alignment, and Political Hostility in Polarized America , 2017 .

[32]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Community Detection in Dynamic Networks , 2017, 2005.08276.

[33]  Tsahi Hayat,et al.  “You too, Second Screeners?” Second Screeners’ Echo Chambers During the 2016 U.S. Elections Primaries , 2017 .

[34]  Matthew Barnidge,et al.  Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings , 2017 .

[35]  Kari Steen-Johnsen,et al.  Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates , 2017, European journal of communication.

[36]  Corwin D. Smidt Polarization and the Decline of the American Floating Voter , 2017 .

[37]  Fabio Giglietto,et al.  A Hashtag Worth a Thousand Words: Discursive Strategies Around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie After the 2015 Charlie Hebdo Shooting , 2017 .

[38]  Gregory A. Huber,et al.  Political Homophily in Social Relationships: Evidence from Online Dating Behavior , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[39]  Clayton Nall,et al.  Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation , 2017, The Journal of Politics.

[40]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[41]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  Latent space models for dynamic networks with weighted edges , 2020, Soc. Networks.

[42]  Timothy Baldwin,et al.  #ISISisNotIslam or #DeportAllMuslims?: predicting unspoken views , 2016, WebSci.

[43]  Damian Trilling,et al.  Should We Worry About Filter Bubbles? , 2016 .

[44]  A. Abramowitz,et al.  The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century , 2016 .

[45]  Yphtach Lelkes Mass Polarization: Manifestations and Measurements , 2016 .

[46]  D. Bobok Selective Exposure , Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers on Facebook , 2016 .

[47]  Lansdall-Welfare Thomas,et al.  Change-Point Analysis of the Public Mood in UK Twitter during the Brexit Referendum , 2016 .

[48]  Karine Nahon,et al.  Where There is Social Media There is Politics , 2015 .

[49]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  Latent Space Models for Dynamic Networks , 2015, 2005.08808.

[50]  Cristina Bosco,et al.  Debate on political reforms in Twitter: A hashtag-driven analysis of political polarization , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA).

[51]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  Analysis of the formation of the structure of social networks by using latent space models for ranked dynamic networks , 2015, 2005.08269.

[52]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook , 2015, Science.

[53]  Dino P. Christenson,et al.  Mass Preferences on Shared Representation and the Composition of Legislative Districts , 2015 .

[54]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Candidate Networks, Citizen Clusters, and Political Expression , 2015 .

[55]  L. Huddy,et al.  Expressive Partisanship: Campaign Involvement, Political Emotion, and Partisan Identity , 2015, American Political Science Review.

[56]  Walid Magdy,et al.  Content and Network Dynamics Behind Egyptian Political Polarization on Twitter , 2014, CSCW.

[57]  Lilliana Mason,et al.  “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization , 2015 .

[58]  Brian G. Knight,et al.  Homophily, Group Size, and the Diffusion of Political Information in Social Networks: Evidence from Twitter , 2014 .

[59]  Laura B. Stephenson,et al.  The Power of the Dark Side: Negative Partisanship and Political Behaviour in Canada , 2014, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[60]  Joshua J. Dyck,et al.  To Know You is Not Necessarily to Love You: The Partisan Mediators of Intergroup Contact , 2014 .

[61]  Alain Noël,et al.  The Forgotten Side of Partisanship: Negative Party Identification in Four Anglo-American Democracies (forthcoming, Comparative Political Studies, November 2014) , 2014 .

[62]  A. Bruns,et al.  Structural layers of communication on Twitter , 2014 .

[63]  Sanjay Sharma Black Twitter?: Racial Hashtags, Networks and Contagion , 2013 .

[64]  Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella,et al.  Secular vs. Islamist polarization in Egypt on Twitter , 2013, 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2013).

[65]  Matthew Levendusky Why Do Partisan Media Polarize Viewers , 2013 .

[66]  A. Garner Ambivalence, the Intergroup Contact Hypothesis, and Attitudes about Gay Rights , 2013 .

[67]  Itai Himelboim,et al.  Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter , 2013, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[68]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[69]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Fast Inference for the Latent Space Network Model Using a Case-Control Approximate Likelihood , 2012, Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America.

[70]  J. Ladd Why Americans Hate the Media and How It Matters , 2011 .

[71]  Jacob Ratkiewicz,et al.  Political Polarization on Twitter , 2011, ICWSM.

[72]  Hila Becker,et al.  Hip and trendy: Characterizing emerging trends on Twitter , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[73]  N. Martin,et al.  The Politics of Mate Choice , 2011 .

[74]  Radford M. Neal Optimal Proposal Distributions and Adaptive MCMC , 2008 .

[75]  Jennifer Brundidge Encountering "Difference" in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks , 2010 .

[76]  Bill Bishop,et al.  The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America Is Tearing Us Apart , 2008 .

[77]  Kyle L. Saunders,et al.  Is Polarization a Myth? , 2008, The Journal of Politics.

[78]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches , 2006 .

[79]  Louis A. Penner,et al.  The Social Psychology of Prosocial Behavior , 2006 .

[80]  Diana C. Mutz Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[81]  A. Moore,et al.  Dynamic social network analysis using latent space models , 2005, SKDD.

[82]  Stanley B. Greenberg The Two Americas: Our Current Political Deadlock and How to Break It , 2004 .

[83]  Richard Holt,et al.  Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-Mediated Communication , 2004 .

[84]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[85]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[86]  Diana C. Mutz,et al.  Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of Mass Media , 2001, American Political Science Review.

[87]  K. T. Poole,et al.  D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update ToCongress: A Political Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 2001 .

[88]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[89]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[90]  S. King-Hall THE INDEPENDENT IN POLITICS , 1951 .