WorkflowHub: Community Framework for Enabling Scientific Workflow Research and Development

Scientific workflows are a cornerstone of modern scientific computing. They are used to describe complex computational applications that require efficient and robust management of large volumes of data, which are typically stored/processed on heterogeneous, distributed resources. The workflow research and development community has employed a number of methods for the quantitative evaluation of existing and novel workflow algorithms and systems. In particular, a common approach is to simulate workflow executions. In previous work, we have presented a collection of tools that have been used for aiding research and development activities in the Pegasus project, and that have been adopted by others for conducting workflow research. Despite their popularity, there are several shortcomings that prevent easy adoption, maintenance, and consistency with the evolving structures and computational requirements of production workflows. In this work, we present WorkflowHub, a community framework that provides a collection of tools for analyzing workflow execution traces, producing realistic synthetic workflow traces, and simulating workflow executions. We demonstrate the realism of the generated synthetic traces by comparing simulated executions of these traces with actual workflow executions. We also contrast these results with those obtained when using the previously available collection of tools. We find that our framework not only can be used to generate representative synthetic workflow traces (i.e., with workflow structures and task characteristics distributions that resemble those in traces obtained from real-world workflow executions), but can also generate representative workflow traces at larger scales than that of available workflow traces.

[1]  Yves Robert,et al.  A Generic Approach to Scheduling and Checkpointing Workflows , 2018, ICPP.

[2]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  The Failure Trace Archive: Enabling Comparative Analysis of Failures in Diverse Distributed Systems , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing.

[3]  Daniel S. Katz,et al.  Application skeletons: Construction and use in eScience , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[4]  Miron Livny,et al.  Pegasus, a workflow management system for science automation , 2015, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[5]  John Chilton,et al.  Common Workflow Language, v1.0 , 2016 .

[6]  Jano I. van Hemert,et al.  Scientific Workflows , 2016, ACM Comput. Surv..

[7]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  The Workflow Trace Archive: Open-Access Data From Public and Private Computing Infrastructures , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[8]  Henri Casanova,et al.  Teaching Parallel and Distributed Computing Concepts in Simulation with WRENCH , 2019, 2019 IEEE/ACM Workshop on Education for High-Performance Computing (EduHPC).

[9]  Muhammad Ali Amer,et al.  Evaluating Workflow Tools with SDAG , 2012, 2012 SC Companion: High Performance Computing, Networking Storage and Analysis.

[10]  Rizos Sakellariou,et al.  A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applications , 2016, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[11]  Yves Robert,et al.  Scheduling independent stochastic tasks under deadline and budget constraints , 2018, 2018 30th International Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing (SBAC-PAD).

[12]  Alexandru Iosup,et al.  The Grid Workloads Archive , 2008, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[13]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  myExperiment: a repository and social network for the sharing of bioinformatics workflows , 2010, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  Lavanya Ramakrishnan,et al.  The future of scientific workflows , 2018, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[15]  Dan Tsafrir,et al.  Experience with using the Parallel Workloads Archive , 2014, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[16]  Henri Casanova,et al.  Developing accurate and scalable simulators of production workflow management systems with WRENCH , 2020, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[17]  Joel Nothman,et al.  SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.

[18]  Miron Livny,et al.  The Evolution of the Pegasus Workflow Management Software , 2019, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[19]  Shantenu Jha,et al.  Next Generation Workload Management System For Big Data on Heterogeneous Distributed Computing , 2015 .

[20]  Henri Casanova,et al.  WRENCH: A Framework for Simulating Workflow Management Systems , 2018, 2018 IEEE/ACM Workflows in Support of Large-Scale Science (WORKS).