Numerical simulation of material flow behavior of friction stir welding influenced by rotational tool geometry

Abstract Considering the practical geometry of rotational tool and the relation between the material parameters and temperature, the finite volume model of friction stir welding is established on basis of the ANSYS FLUENT software. The effect of shoulder geometry and pin geometry on material plastic flow behavior is studied. The results of numerical simulation show that the flow velocity of material decreases with the increase of the distance away from the weldment surface or the rotational axis of pin. The flow velocity of material inside weldment is increased by decreasing the cone angle of pine or decreasing the width of screw groove. When the rotational tool with the left screw pin rotates clockwise, the flow direction of material near pin is downward while the flow direction near the thermal–mechanical affected zone is upward, which is opposite to that of the right screw pin. From the view of improvement of material flow, the concentric-circles-flute shoulder is better than the inner-concave-flute shoulder or the plane shoulder. Therefore, choosing the reasonable shoulder geometry and the reasonable pin geometry can be good for improving the material flow during the friction stir welding process and avoiding the root defects.

[1]  Paul A. Colegrove,et al.  3-Dimensional CFD modelling of flow round a threaded friction stir welding tool profile , 2005 .

[2]  R. Fonda,et al.  Microstructural evolution ahead of the tool in aluminum friction stir welds , 2008 .

[3]  A. Squillace,et al.  2198 Al―Li plates joined by Friction Stir Welding: Mechanical and microstructural behavior , 2009 .

[4]  Hidetoshi Fujii,et al.  Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys , 2006 .

[5]  A. Jackson,et al.  Constitutive equations for use in prediction of flow stress during extrusion of aluminium alloys , 1997 .

[6]  Livan Fratini,et al.  Design of the friction stir welding tool using the continuum based FEM model , 2006 .

[7]  Mohammad Jahazi,et al.  Effect of tool rotational speed and probe length on lap joint quality of a friction stir welded magnesium alloy , 2011 .

[8]  Yanhua Zhao NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF 2014 ALUMINIUM ALLOY FRICTION STIR WELDING PROCESS , 2006 .

[9]  R. Fonda,et al.  Development of grain structure during friction stir welding , 2004 .

[10]  J. T. Chen,et al.  3D modeling of material flow in friction stir welding under different process parameters , 2007 .

[11]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Visualization of the material flow in AA2195 friction-stir welds using a marker insert technique , 2001 .

[12]  Ke Liming,et al.  Sucking-extruding Theory for the Material Flow in Friction Stir Welds , 2009 .

[13]  Thomas J. Lienert,et al.  Three-dimensional heat and material flow during friction stir welding of mild steel , 2007 .

[14]  Kang Wen,et al.  Comparative investigation of tungsten inert gas and friction stir welding characteristics of Al–Mg–Sc alloy plates , 2010 .

[15]  J. H. Hollomon,et al.  Effect of Strain Rate Upon Plastic Flow of Steel , 1944 .

[16]  Carter Hamilton,et al.  A thermal model of friction stir welding in aluminum alloys , 2008 .

[17]  K. Dang Van,et al.  Modelling of the residual state of friction stir welded plates , 2008 .

[18]  J. Hilgert,et al.  Thermal models for bobbin tool friction stir welding , 2011 .

[19]  L. Fu,et al.  Friction Stir Welding of Al Alloy Thin Plate by Rotational Tool without Pin , 2011 .

[20]  Shigeki Hirasawa,et al.  Analysis of effect of tool geometry on plastic flow during friction stir spot welding using particle method , 2010 .

[21]  P. Cavaliere,et al.  Effect of tool position on the fatigue properties of dissimilar 2024-7075 sheets joined by friction stir welding , 2008 .