On worst-case aggregation analysis for network location problems

Network location problems occur when new facilities must be located on a network, and the network distances between new and existing facilities are important. In urban, regional, or geographic contexts, there may be hundreds of thousands (or more) of existing facilities, in which case it is common to aggregate existing facilities, e.g. represent all the existing facility locations in a zip code area by a centroid. This aggregation makes the size of the problem more manageable for data collection and data processing purposes, as well as for purposes of analysis; at the same time, it introduces errors, and results in an approximating location problem being solved. There seems to be relatively little theory for doing aggregation, or evaluating the results of aggregation; most approaches are based on experimentation or computational studies. We propose a theory that has the potential to improve the means available for doing aggregation.

[1]  Timothy J. Lowe,et al.  Parameter estimation for the EOQ lot‐size model: Minimax and expected value choices , 1983 .

[2]  S. L. Hakimi,et al.  Optimum Locations of Switching Centers and the Absolute Centers and Medians of a Graph , 1964 .

[3]  M. Daskin,et al.  Aggregation effects in maximum covering models , 1990 .

[4]  George L. Nemhauser,et al.  Easy and hard bottleneck location problems , 1979, Discret. Appl. Math..

[5]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Invited reviewLocational analysis , 1983 .

[6]  Gerard Rushton,et al.  Applications of location models , 1990 .

[7]  E. Hillsman,et al.  Errors in measuring distances from populations to service centers , 1978 .

[8]  P. Dearing Review of recent developments: Location problems , 1985 .

[9]  L Bach,et al.  The Problem of Aggregation and Distance for Analyses of Accessibility and Access Opportunity in Location-Allocation Models , 1981 .

[10]  Leon F. McGinnis,et al.  Facility Layout and Location: An Analytical Approach , 1991 .

[11]  H. Crowder,et al.  Cluster Analysis: An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation , 1979 .

[12]  James R. Evans,et al.  Aggregation and Disaggregation Techniques and Methodology in Optimization , 1991, Oper. Res..

[13]  Ian Masser,et al.  An empirical investigation of the use of Broadbent’s rule in spatial system design , 1978 .

[14]  M. Fisher Worst-Case Analysis of Heuristic Algorithms , 1980 .

[15]  Richard W. Hamming,et al.  Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers , 1963 .

[16]  Kenneth Steiglitz,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity , 1981 .

[17]  Timothy J. Lowe,et al.  Location on Networks: A Survey. Part I: The p-Center and p-Median Problems , 1983 .

[18]  O. Kariv,et al.  An Algorithmic Approach to Network Location Problems. II: The p-Medians , 1979 .

[19]  M. Brandeau,et al.  An overview of representative problems in location research , 1989 .

[20]  S. Hakimi Optimum Distribution of Switching Centers in a Communication Network and Some Related Graph Theoretic Problems , 1965 .

[21]  Bhaba R. Sarker,et al.  Discrete location theory , 1991 .

[22]  Oded Maimon,et al.  Algorithms for the m-center problems: A survey , 1982 .

[23]  Raymond A. Serway,et al.  Printed test bank to accompany Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics , 1982 .

[24]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  Localizing 2-medians on probabilistic and deterministic tree networks , 1980, Networks.

[25]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  “Spatial nodes” in discrete location problems , 1986 .

[26]  Timothy J. Lowe,et al.  Duality and Distance Constraints for the Nonlinear p-Center Problem and Covering Problem on a Tree Network , 1982, Oper. Res..

[27]  J. Krarup,et al.  Selected Families of Location Problems , 1979 .

[28]  Timothy J. Lowe,et al.  Distance Constraints for Tree Network Multifacility Location Problems , 1978, Oper. Res..

[29]  Pitu B. Mirchandani,et al.  Location on networks : theory and algorithms , 1979 .