Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Purpose— The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of studies that investigated the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Methods— We searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 1990 and October 2011 in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and CINAHL using the following key words: stroke, cerebrovascular accident, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. The mean effect size and a 95% CI were estimated for the motor outcome and motor threshold using fixed and random effect models. Results— Eighteen of the 34 candidate articles were included in this analysis. The selected studies involved a total of 392 patients. A significant effect size of 0.55 was found for motor outcome (95% CI, 0.37–0.72). Further subgroup analyses demonstrated more prominent effects for subcortical stroke (mean effect size, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44–1.02) or studies applying low-frequency rTMS (mean effect size, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.42–0.95). Only 4 patients of the 18 articles included in this analysis reported adverse effects from rTMS. Conclusions— rTMS has a positive effect on motor recovery in patients with stroke, especially for those with subcortical stroke. Low-frequency rTMS over the unaffected hemisphere may be more beneficial than high-frequency rTMS over the affected hemisphere. Recent limited data suggest that intermittent theta-burst stimulation over the affected hemisphere might be a useful intervention. Further well-designed studies in a larger population are required to better elucidate the differential roles of various rTMS protocols in stroke treatment.

[1]  Sung Tae Kim,et al.  Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  E. Khedr,et al.  Role of 1 and 3 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischaemic stroke , 2009, European journal of neurology.

[3]  U. Ziemann.  TMS Induced Plasticity in Human Cortex , 2004, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[4]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2004, Postgraduate medical journal.

[5]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  E. Khedr,et al.  Long‐term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke , 2010, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[7]  D. Nowak,et al.  Functional neuromuscular stimulation to improve severe hand dysfunction after stroke: Does inhibitory rTMS enhance therapeutic efficiency? , 2011, Experimental Neurology.

[8]  M. T. Medina,et al.  Stroke epidemiology, prevention, and management strategies at a regional level: Latin America and the Caribbean , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[9]  W. Byblow,et al.  Combining Theta Burst Stimulation With Training After Subcortical Stroke , 2010, Stroke.

[10]  G. Fink,et al.  Effects of rTMS on grip force control following subcortical stroke , 2008, Experimental Neurology.

[11]  Olaf Gefeller,et al.  Epidemiology of Ischemic Stroke Subtypes According to TOAST Criteria: Incidence, Recurrence, and Long-Term Survival in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: A Population-Based Study , 2001, Stroke.

[12]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke , 2000, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke , 2005, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[16]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  L. Cohen,et al.  Drivers of brain plasticity , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[18]  S. Page,et al.  Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  P. Rossini,et al.  Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  A Schnitzler,et al.  The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials , 2001, The Lancet.

[23]  V. Feigin,et al.  Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  J. Liepert,et al.  Improvement of dexterity by single session low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in acute stroke: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[25]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[26]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[27]  H. Siebner,et al.  Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[28]  R. Hays,et al.  Clinical significance of patient-reported questionnaire data: another step toward consensus. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[29]  R. Rosenfeld.  Patients , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[30]  P. Rossini,et al.  Facilitating acute stroke recovery with magnetic fields? , 2005, Neurology.

[31]  W. G. Cochran.  The combination of estimates from different experiments. , 1954 .

[32]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[33]  Christian Grefkes,et al.  Differential effects of high‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[34]  L. Merabet,et al.  The plastic human brain cortex. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  P. Pasqualetti,et al.  Interhemispheric Asymmetries of Motor Cortex Excitability in the Postacute Stroke Stage: A Paired-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2003, Stroke.

[36]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[37]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[39]  Michel Rijntjes,et al.  Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: new insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies , 2006, Current opinion in neurology.

[40]  A. Prevo,et al.  The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. , 1999, Disability and rehabilitation.

[41]  Steven D. Freedman,et al.  A Sham-Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients , 2006, Stroke.

[42]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex on movement kinematics and neural activity in subcortical stroke. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[43]  L. Weisberg,et al.  Treatment of Chronic Hypertension for the Prevention of Stroke , 2003, Southern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala. Print).

[44]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[45]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[46]  M. Hallett,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[47]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[48]  D Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Annals of internal medicine.

[49]  Katsunori Ikoma,et al.  Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[50]  Stephen E. Nadeau,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as an Adjunct to Constraint-Induced Therapy: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[51]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[52]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Follow-up of interhemispheric differences of motor evoked potentials from the `affected' and `unaffected' hemispheres in human stroke , 1998, Brain Research.

[53]  G Schlaug,et al.  Repetitive TMS of the motor cortex improves ipsilateral sequential simple finger movements , 2004, Neurology.

[54]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[56]  Tamer H. Emara,et al.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1Hz and 5Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke , 2010, European journal of neurology.

[57]  V. Pomeroy,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Muscle Contraction to Enhance Stroke Recovery: A Randomized Proof-of-Principle and Feasibility Investigation , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.