Optimal allocation of TCSCs by adaptive DE algorithm

This study presents an adaptive differential evolution (DE) algorithm to allocate the thyristor-controlled series compensator (TCSC) incorporated with the reactive power management problem. In addition, a dynamic updating is applied for scaling and penalty factors to enhance the performance of the multi-objective DE algorithm. During the selection of the best candidate lines for efficient allocation of TCSC devices, three situations are considered for excluded transmission lines. These situations are the lines connected between two generating units; lines connected through transformers and the lines of low losses. The considered multi-objective function compromises between reducing power losses, improving voltage profile, reducing reactive power losses, reducing TCSC cost and reducing number of flexible alternating current transmission systems units. The optimal siting and sizing of TCSC is defined for normal and emergency operating conditions. The proposed procedure is employed for IEEE 9-bus and IEEE 30-bus test systems in addition to western delta network as a real part of the Egyptian network. Four case studies are considered for each test system to represent normal and abnormal operating conditions. Results clearly indicate the effectiveness of the adaptive DE algorithm to allocate perfectly the TCSC to enhance the system performance.

[1]  Sakthivel Padaiyatchi,et al.  OPF-based reactive power planning and voltage stability limit improvement under single line outage contingency condition through evolutionary algorithms , 2013 .

[2]  Z. Yu,et al.  Optimal placement of FACTs devices in deregulated systems considering line losses , 2004 .

[3]  Chaohua Dai,et al.  Dynamic multi-group self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm for reactive power optimization , 2010 .

[4]  Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz,et al.  Optimal Location of Thyristor-controlled Series Compensators in Power Systems for Increasing Loadability by Genetic Algorithm , 2011 .

[5]  Naoto Yorino,et al.  Expected security cost-based FACTS device allocation using hybrid PSO , 2011 .

[6]  K. Shanmukha Sundar,et al.  Selection of TCSC location for secured optimal power flow under normal and network contingencies , 2012 .

[7]  S. J. Cheng,et al.  Evolutionary optimization techniques for optimal location and parameter settings of TCSC under single line contingency , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[8]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  A decentralized approach for optimal reactive power dispatch using a Lagrangian decomposition method , 2012 .

[9]  Innocent Kamwa,et al.  Optimal placement of multiple-type FACTS devices to maximize power system loadability using a generic graphical user interface , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Approach for the solution of transmission congestion with multi-type FACTS devices , 2016 .

[11]  A. A. Mousa,et al.  Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization Based Local Search for Reactive Power Compensation Problem , 2012 .

[12]  M. A. Abido,et al.  Optimal location and setting of SVC and TCSC devices using non-dominated sorting particle swarm optimization , 2009 .

[13]  Ragab A. El-Sehiemy,et al.  Multi-phase search optimisation algorithm for constrained optimal power flow problem , 2014, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[14]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability , 2007 .

[15]  D.C. Yu,et al.  A novel optimal reactive power dispatch method based on an improved hybrid evolutionary programming technique , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  R. A. El-Sehiemy,et al.  Optimal reactive power dispatch using ant colony optimization algorithm , 2011 .

[17]  B. K. Tripathy,et al.  Approximate Reasoning through Multigranular Approximate Rough Equalities , 2014 .