Toward a unified account of the length effects in sentence production and comprehension

Our research investigated how the long-before-short (LbS) preference affects sentence production and sentence comprehension, including the...

[1]  John C Trueswell,et al.  Children's (in)ability to recover from garden paths in a verb-final language: evidence for developing control in sentence processing. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[2]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking , 2004 .

[3]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Conceptual Accessibility and Serial Order in Greek Speech Production , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[4]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Upyong Hong,et al.  The Effect of Role Predictability and Word Predictability on Sentence Comprehension , 2014 .

[6]  Mercè Prat-Sala,et al.  Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production , 2000 .

[7]  E. Gibson.  The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. , 2000 .

[8]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Prominence in Triconstituent Compounds: Pitch Contours and Linguistic Theory , 2013, Language and speech.

[9]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  Little houses and casas pequeñas: Message formulation and syntactic form in unscripted speech with speakers of English and Spanish , 2008, Cognition.

[10]  R. Levy.  Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[11]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article WHAT THE EYES SAY ABOUT SPEAKING , 2022 .

[12]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[13]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding , 2001, Cognition.

[14]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  The Production of Head-Initial and Head-Final Languages , 2010 .

[15]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .

[16]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[17]  F. Chang,et al.  “Long before short” preference in the production of a head-final language , 2001, Cognition.

[18]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production , 2013, Cognition.

[19]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Toward a Cognitive Psychology of Syntax: Information Processing Contributions to Sentence Formulation , 1982 .

[20]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Eye movements and on-line language comprehension processes , 1989 .

[21]  Roger J. Wales,et al.  PASSIVES AND TOPICALIZATION , 1973 .

[22]  K. Rayner,et al.  Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements of Highly Skilled and Average Readers: Differential Effects of Frequency and Predictability , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  Franklin Chang,et al.  Learning to order words: A connectionist model of heavy NP shift and accessibility effects in Japanese and English , 2009 .

[25]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  John A. Hawkins.  Some issues in a performance theory of word order , 1998 .

[27]  M. Pickering,et al.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[28]  Michael P. Wilson,et al.  Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[29]  Julie E. Boland.  Visual arguments , 2005, Cognition.

[30]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Post-verbal constituent ordering in English , 2003 .

[31]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  How language production shapes language form and comprehension , 2012, Front. Psychol..

[32]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[33]  A. Meyer.  Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[34]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Verb Argument Structure in Parsing and Interpretation: Evidence from wh-Questions , 1995 .

[35]  Hye-Won Choi.  Length and Order: A Corpus Study of Korean Dative-Accusative Construction , 2007 .

[36]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[37]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Chapter 13 The Role of Lexical Representations in Sentence Processing , 1991 .

[38]  L. Wheeldon,et al.  Planning scope in spoken sentence production: the role of grammatical units. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[39]  Jean-Pierre Koenig,et al.  Arguments for adjuncts , 2003, Cognition.

[40]  O. Behaghel,et al.  Deutsche Syntax : eine geschichtliche Darstellung , 1923 .

[41]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .

[43]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[44]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Predicting the dative alternation , 2007 .

[45]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[46]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  HEAVINESS VS . , 2000 .

[47]  R. Saxe,et al.  A Noisy-Channel Account of Crosslinguistic Word-Order Variation , 2013, Psychological science.

[48]  J. Hawkins.  Efficiency and complexity in grammars , 2004 .

[49]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[50]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[51]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[52]  Victoria B. Anderson,et al.  UNIVERSAL VERSUS LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC CONCEPTUAL EFFECTS ON SHIFTED WORD-ORDER PRODUCTION IN KOREAN : EVIDENCE FROM BILINGUALS , 2008 .

[53]  Charles E. Osgood,et al.  Salience and sentencing: Some production principles , 1977 .

[54]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[55]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic flexibility and competition in sentence production: The case of English and Russian , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[57]  John Hale,et al.  A Probabilistic Earley Parser as a Psycholinguistic Model , 2001, NAACL.

[58]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Implicit Arguments in Sentence Processing , 1995 .

[59]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[60]  V. Ferreira.  Is It Better to Give Than to Donate? Syntactic Flexibility in Language Production , 1996 .

[61]  Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al.  Thematic role assignment in context , 1999 .

[62]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world , 2004 .

[63]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .

[64]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[65]  C. Thompson,et al.  Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[66]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[67]  Hiroko Yamashita,et al.  Why Speakers Produce Scrambled Sentences: An Analysis of a Spoken Language Corpus in Japanese , 2010 .

[68]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Investigating the effects of a set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in reading. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  Heeju Hwang,et al.  Having a syntactic choice is not always better: the effects of syntactic flexibility on Korean production , 2014 .

[70]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Chapter 16 – Eye Movement Measures to Study Global Text Processing , 2003 .

[71]  Victor S Ferreira,et al.  Given-New Ordering Effects on the Production of Scrambled Sentences in Japanese , 2003, Journal of psycholinguistic research.