Multi-objective optimization of polyester-rope and steel-rope suspended footbridges

Abstract Historically, suspended footbridges have been built from ropes (i.e., cables) constructed of a variety of materials including iron and natural fibers. However, contemporary suspended footbridges are typically constructed with steel rope. One exception, a 64 m span polyester-rope footbridge completed in 2013, demonstrates the potential for alternative rope materials in contemporary footbridge design and construction. The first goal of this paper is to support the idea that polyester rope has promise in future footbridge applications by comparing minimum rope volume and self-weight results for polyester-rope and steel-rope footbridges with spans ranging from 15 to 64 m in two multi-objective optimization problems. In both problems the competitive objective functions are span which is maximized and rope volume which is minimized. The results are minimum volume systems for spans in the defined range. Minimizing volume reduces rope cost and eases material transport and handling. To provide an alternative measure of rope quantity, volume results are scaled to find the equivalent self-weights. This study focuses on in-plane structural behavior and investigates two-dimensional rope systems with or without prestress and with or without under-deck stays. A combination of static and natural frequency constraints is considered in the optimization problems. The second goal of this paper is to describe the novel methodology developed to evaluate these optimization problems. This methodology combines a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for searching the design space with dynamic relaxation and eigenanalysis algorithms for the structural analysis. Results indicate that polyester-rope systems have higher volumes, but lower self-weights than steel-rope systems. This observation supports the premise that polyester-rope footbridges are potential alternatives to steel-rope footbridges. The presented methodology can be adapted to evaluate how other unconventional materials compare to more conventional counterparts that are well established in bridge applications.

[1]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Vibration Characteristics of Shallow Suspension Bridge with Pre-tensioned Cables , 2005 .

[2]  Angus Low,et al.  LONDON MILLENNIUM BRIDGE: PEDESTRIAN-INDUCED LATERAL VIBRATION , 2001 .

[3]  Shaofan Li,et al.  A simplified structural mechanics model for cable-truss footbridges and its implications for preliminary design , 2014 .

[4]  John F. Flory,et al.  Polyester Mooring Lines on Platforms and MODUs in Deep Water , 2007 .

[5]  H M Irvine,et al.  STATICS OF SUSPENDED CABLES , 1975 .

[6]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Synchronization of human walking observed during lateral vibration of a congested pedestrian bridge , 1993 .

[7]  David P. Billington,et al.  HISTORY AND AESTHETICS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES , 1991 .

[8]  M. Barnes,et al.  Form Finding and Analysis of Tension Structures by Dynamic Relaxation , 1999 .

[9]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review , 2003, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[10]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Resonant vibration of shallow suspension footbridges , 2005 .

[11]  John Ochsendorf Sustainable Structural Design: Lessons from History , 2004 .

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2001, Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization.

[13]  El-Ghazali Talbi,et al.  Metaheuristics - From Design to Implementation , 2009 .

[14]  John F. Flory,et al.  Defining, Measuring, and Calculating the Properties of Fiber Rope Deepwater Mooring Lines , 2004 .

[15]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[16]  Jiri Strasky,et al.  Stress Ribbon and Cable-supported Pedestrian Bridges , 2005 .

[17]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications , 1999 .

[18]  Sergio Pellegrino,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of free-form grid structures , 2009 .

[19]  Antonio J. Nebro,et al.  A survey of multi-objective metaheuristics applied to structural optimization , 2014 .

[20]  Ian F. C. Smith,et al.  Fundamentals of Computer-Aided Engineering , 2003 .

[21]  Yozo Fujino,et al.  Model-based design and experimental validation of active vibration control for a stress ribbon bridge using pneumatic muscle actuators , 2011 .

[22]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[23]  Christos T. Georgakis,et al.  Cable supported bridges concept and design , 2011 .

[24]  David Greiner,et al.  Improving Computational Mechanics Optimum Design Using Helper Objectives: An Application in Frame Bar Structures , 2007, EMO.

[25]  Landolf Rhode-Barbarigos,et al.  An automated robust design methodology for suspended structures , 2015 .

[26]  Poonam Garg,et al.  A Comparison between Memetic algorithm and Genetic algorithm for the cryptanalysis of Simplified Data Encryption Standard algorithm , 2010, ArXiv.

[27]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Load deformation characteristics of shallow suspension footbridge with reverse profiled pre-tensioned cables , 2005 .