A model and its application for uncertainly group decision making ∗

To better solve the complicated problem of multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM), we proposed a systemic approach by extending TOPSIS method. Linguistic assess terms of each group member were translated into the matrix of fuzzy triangular numbers. By using the incomplete preference information, multi-steps interactive procedure was applied for evaluating, selecting, ranking and approximating group ideal point step by step. In addition, the parameters of group satisfaction degree were designed to weigh group consensus and control the procedure; thus, the order of alternatives were given out conveniently. Therefore, the cumbersome for aggregating and computing group preference data could be avoid. The distance from each alternative to group Fuzzy Ideal Solution (FIS) was calculated to determine the ranking order of all alternatives. Our approach is useful in solving MAGDM problem with less structuralized and incomplete information. A MAGDM example was tested to demonstrate the utility of our method. The result indicated that a interactive group decision support system of realistic methodological frame can be build and applied in uncertainly distributed remote decision making environment with more than one decision maker.

[1]  M. Beynon An investigation of the role of scale values in the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making , 2002 .

[2]  Timothy W. Butler,et al.  An Interactive Framework for Multi‐Person, Multiobjective Decisions , 1993 .

[3]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Interactive decision aiding for group decision support , 1995 .

[5]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Interactive group decision making procedure under incomplete information , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Miroljub Kljajić,et al.  Group exploration of system dynamics models—is there a place for a feedback loop in the decision process? , 2003 .

[7]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Promoting consensus in small decision making groups , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[8]  ChenChen-Tung Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000 .

[9]  Jae Kyeong Kim,et al.  A utility range-based interactive group support system for multiattribute decision making , 2001, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[11]  Noel Bryson,et al.  Generating consensus priority interval vectors for group decision‐making in the AHP , 2000 .

[12]  Bartel Van de Walle,et al.  A relational analysis of decision makers' preferences , 2003, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[13]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[14]  Huey-Ming Lee,et al.  Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The new science of management decision , 1960 .

[16]  Wan Chul Yoon,et al.  Establishing strict dominance between alternatives with special type of incomplete information , 1997 .