Integrated Cooperative Adaptive Cruise and Variable Speed Limit Controls for Reducing Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Bottlenecks Based on Micro-Simulations

Freeway bottlenecks lead to traffic congestion and speed reduction, resulting in increased risks of rear-end collision. This paper aimed to develop a control strategy of an integrated system of cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) and variable speed limit (VSL) to reduce rear-end collision risks near freeway bottlenecks. A microscopic simulation testbed was first constructed, in which the realistic PATH CACC models and surrogate safety measures of the time exposed time-to-collision (TET) and time integrated time-to-collision (TIT) were used. A feedback control algorithm was then developed for the proposed vehicle to infrastructure system of CACC and VSL. The simulation results showed that the proposed integration system with 100% CACC penetration rate can reduce the rear-end collision risks effectively, with the TIT and TET declined by 98%. The average travel time was also decreased by 33%, compared with the manual vehicles without any control. Moreover, the safety improvements of the proposed integrated system are quite stable at the various bottlenecks with different magnitudes of speed reductions. The sensitivity analyses suggested that the penetration rate of CACC has significant impact on safety performance. The VSL control plays an important role in reducing rear-end collision risks when the penetration rate of CACC is low. The combination of CACC and VSL controls mitigates the negative effects of the mixed traffic flow of the manual and CACC vehicles.

[1]  Bart van Arem,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic flow stability , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[2]  Keqiang Li,et al.  Lane changing intention recognition based on speech recognition models , 2016 .

[3]  Xiang Li,et al.  Studies of vehicle lane-changing dynamics and its effect on traffic efficiency, safety and environmental impact , 2017 .

[4]  Katja Vogel,et al.  A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Bart van Arem,et al.  The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[6]  Lina Kattan,et al.  Variable speed limit: A microscopic analysis in a connected vehicle environment , 2015 .

[7]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Modeling cooperative and autonomous adaptive cruise control dynamic responses using experimental data , 2014 .

[8]  Xuedong Yan,et al.  In-depth analysis of drivers' merging behavior and rear-end crash risks in work zone merging areas. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Yang Lu,et al.  Proactive Optimal Variable Speed Limit Control for Recurrently Congested Freeway Bottlenecks , 2013 .

[10]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Enhanced intelligent driver model to access the impact of driving strategies on traffic capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Wei Wang,et al.  Evaluation of the impacts of cooperative adaptive cruise control on reducing rear-end collision risks on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Chris Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Traffic Safety , 2006 .

[14]  Wen-Long Jin,et al.  Mobility and Environment Improvement of Signalized Networks through Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) Communications , 2016 .

[15]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Estimation of rear-end vehicle crash frequencies in urban road tunnels. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Cheol Oh,et al.  Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Variable Speed Limits: Safety and Operational Impacts of a Candidate Control Strategy for Freeway Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Adaptive cruise control design for active congestion avoidance , 2008 .

[20]  Wei Wang,et al.  Reducing the risk of rear-end collisions with infrastructure-to-vehicle (I2V) integration of variable speed limit control and adaptive cruise control system , 2016, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  Zhi-bin Li,et al.  Development of control strategy of variable speed limits for improving traffic operations at freeway bottlenecks , 2014 .

[22]  Mike McDonald,et al.  PARAMETER ANALYSIS FOR COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[23]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow , 2012 .

[24]  Daniel J. Dailey,et al.  Integrated Adaptive Cruise Control Car-Following Model Based on Trajectory Data , 2016 .

[25]  Bart Van Arem,et al.  Driver and Vehicle Characteristics and Platoon and Traffic Flow Stability , 2010 .

[26]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a Control Strategy of Variable Speed Limits to Reduce Rear-End Collision Risks Near Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[27]  Raymond J Kiefer,et al.  Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[28]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Impact of Driver Compliance on the Safety and Operational Impacts of Freeway Variable Speed Limit Systems , 2011 .

[29]  Nathan van de Wouw,et al.  Design and experimental evaluation of cooperative adaptive cruise control , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[30]  Wei Wang,et al.  Development of a variable speed limit strategy to reduce secondary collision risks during inclement weathers. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Qiang Meng,et al.  Evaluation of rear-end crash risk at work zone using work zone traffic data. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Dynamic Variable Speed Limit Strategies for Real-Time Crash Risk Reduction on Freeways , 2008 .

[33]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Combined Variable Speed Limit and Lane Change Control for Truck-Dominant Highway Segment , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[34]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[35]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Testing Effects of Warning Messages and Variable Speed Limits on Driver Behavior Using Driving Simulator , 2008 .

[36]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Crash Risk Assessment Using Intelligent Transportation Systems Data and Real-Time Intervention Strategies to Improve Safety on Freeways , 2007, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[37]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[38]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  COOPERATIVE ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (CACC) DEFINITIONS AND OPERATING CONCEPTS , 2015 .

[39]  Zhongke Shi,et al.  The effects of vehicular gap changes with memory on traffic flow in cooperative adaptive cruise control strategy , 2015 .

[40]  Steven E Shladover,et al.  Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control: Driver Acceptance of Following Gap Settings Less than One Second , 2010 .