A Comparison Study of Coupled and Decoupled Uplink-Downlink Access in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks

The rapid evolution of cellular networks has brought great changes to mobile network architecture. One trend is the dense deployment of base stations (BSs) in heterogeneous cellular network (HetNets) architecture. On the other hand, the booming mobile Internet applications introduce increasingly significant imbalance in regard to Signal to Interference and Noise Ratio (SINR) statistics and traffic load between uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) in HetNets. These evolutions inspire us to exploit decoupling of UL and DL in HetNets for improving system performance. In this paper, we conduct a comparison study for the system performance of the decoupled UL/DL access (DUDA) mode and traditional coupled UL/DL access (CUDA) mode based on stochastic geometry theory. Compared to existing related work, we establish an analytical model for CUDA mode as a comparison reference and consider a more realistic system model, where we employ dynamic transmit power control in UL transmission by applying fractional power control (FPC) to model a location-dependent per-mobile power state. Numerical results reveal that DUDA mode significantly outperforms CUDA mode in terms of system rate, spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) in HetNets. In addition, results also show that DUDA mode can improve load balance and fairness. Simulation results further validate the accuracy of our analytical model.

[1]  Federico Boccardi,et al.  Downlink and Uplink Decoupling: A disruptive architectural design for 5G networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[2]  Marceau Coupechoux,et al.  How to set the fractional power control compensation factor in LTE ? , 2011, 34th IEEE Sarnoff Symposium.

[3]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Analytical Modeling of Uplink Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[4]  Yongbin Wei,et al.  A survey on 3GPP heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[5]  Dacheng Yang,et al.  Energy efficiency model based on stochastic geometry in dynamic TDD cellular networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC).

[6]  B Suresh,et al.  Survey of Power Control Schemes for LTE Uplink , 2013 .

[7]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Seven ways that HetNets are a cellular paradigm shift , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Liljana Gavrilovska,et al.  Analysis of the Decoupled Access for Downlink and Uplink in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks , 2014, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.

[10]  Shi Jin,et al.  Energy Efficiency of Cross-Tier Base Station Cooperation in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[11]  Carsten F. Ball,et al.  Uplink Power Control Performance in UTRAN LTE Networks , 2009, MCSS.

[12]  Ye Li,et al.  Cross-layer optimization for energy-efficient wireless communications: a survey , 2009 .

[13]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  User Association for Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Liljana Gavrilovska,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Decoupled Downlink and Uplink Access in Heterogeneous Networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[15]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  What Will 5G Be? , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[16]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  Stochastic Geometry for Modeling, Analysis, and Design of Multi-Tier and Cognitive Cellular Wireless Networks: A Survey , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.