Technological Mediation of Ontologies: the Need for Tools to Help Designers in Materializing Ethics

Philosophers of technology such as Peter-Paul Verbeek have addressed the issue of the effects that concrete technologies have on the experience and existence of humans that use them. Drawing on his studies, in this article, the theory of technological mediation was applied to a particular type of technology: the ontologies used within the Semantic Web. Differing from other artefacts, the mediation effects of ontologies is realised indirectly through the applications that embody them as abstract schemas or meta-models. This phenomenon, called meta-mediation, was analysed from the point of view of all the stakeholders involved in the development and use of an ontology. A case study was used to exemplify how ontology differences may affect the way people perceive a web service. This analysis showed that ontology engineering is an inherently moral activity which needs adeguate tools and methodologies to support a more mediation aware approach to design of products and services. Some proposal aimed at this goal have been discussed as well.

[1]  Don Ihde,et al.  Technology and the lifeworld , 1990 .

[2]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism: a proposal and framework for a new discipline of hci , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  D. Watts,et al.  Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network1 , 2009, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[5]  Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon,et al.  An Analysis of Ontology Mismatches; Heterogeneity versus Interoperability , 2007 .

[6]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[7]  Marten van Sinderen,et al.  An Analysis of Service Ontologies , 2010, Pac. Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  R. Cialdini The Science of PERSUASION. , 2001 .

[9]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[10]  Enrico Motta,et al.  Approaches to Semantic Web Services: an Overview and Comparisons , 2004, ESWS.

[11]  Paul R. Smart,et al.  An Analysis of the Origin of Ontology Mismatches on the Semantic Web , 2008, EKAW.

[12]  P. Verbeek,et al.  Materializing Morality , 2006 .

[13]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Complex Mediation , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  W. Pieters On thinging things and serving services: technological mediation and inseparable goods , 2013, Ethics and Information Technology.

[15]  Eric Gould The Act of Writing , 1988 .

[16]  Nathan Crilly,et al.  The Design Stance in User-System Interaction , 2011, Design Issues.

[17]  Elio Toppano,et al.  How Culture May Influence Ontology Co-Design: A Qualitative Study , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Web Eng..

[18]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  The act of writing: A media theory approach , 1995 .

[19]  Vito Roberto,et al.  Ontology engineering: reuse and integration , 2008, Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontologies.

[20]  Aldo Gangemi,et al.  Modelling Ontology Evaluation and Validation , 2006, ESWC.

[21]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[22]  Vito Roberto,et al.  A Semiotic Framework for Ontology Development , 2009, I-SEMANTICS.