Improving N-wire phantom-based freehand ultrasound calibration

Purpose   Freehand tracked ultrasound imaging is an inexpensive non-invasive technique used in several guided interventions. This technique requires spatial calibration between the tracker and the ultrasound image plane. Several calibration devices (a.k.a. phantoms) use N-wires that are convenient for automatic procedures since the segmentation of fiducials in the images and the localization of the middle wires in space are straightforward and can be performed in real time. The procedures reported in literature consider only the spatial position of the middle wire. We investigate if better results can be achieved if the information of all the wires is equally taken into account. We also evaluated the precision and accuracy of the implemented methods to allow comparison with other methods.Methods   We consider a cost function based on the in-plane errors between the intersection of all the wires with the image plane and their respective segmented points in the image. This cost function is minimized iteratively starting from a seed computed with a closed-form solution based on the middle wires.Results   Mean calibration precision achieved with the N-wire phantom was about 0.5 mm using a shallow probe, and mean accuracy was around 1.4 mm with all implemented methods. Precision was about 2.0 mm using a deep probe.Conclusions   Precision and accuracy achieved with the N-wire phantom and a shallow probe are at least comparable to that obtained with other methods traditionally considered more precise. Calibration using N-wires can be done more consistently if the parameters are optimized with the proposed cost function.

[1]  R. Brown A stereotactic head frame for use with CT body scanners. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  Integrated MR and ultrasound imaging for improved image guidance in neurosurgery , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[3]  R W Prager,et al.  Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  Yongmin Kim,et al.  Fast calibration for 3D ultrasound imaging and multimodality image registration , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.

[5]  D M Muratore,et al.  Beam calibration without a phantom for creating a 3-D freehand ultrasound system. , 2001, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  Gabor Fichtinger,et al.  Numerical algorithms for spatial registration of line fiducials from cross-sectional images. , 2002, Medical physics.

[7]  Thomas Langø,et al.  Probe calibration for freehand 3-D ultrasound. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  3D Slicer , 2012, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[9]  L. Collins,et al.  A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[10]  Laurence Mercier,et al.  A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Po-Wei Hsu,et al.  Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Po-Wei Hsu,et al.  Freehand 3D Ultrasound Calibration: A Review , 2009 .

[13]  Purang Abolmaesumi,et al.  A real-time freehand ultrasound calibration system with automatic accuracy feedback and control. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Jackrit Suthakorn,et al.  Ultrasound Calibration Toolkit with a High-Adjustability Feature Based on User Requirements , 2011 .

[15]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[16]  Andras Lasso,et al.  Implementation of the PLUS open-source toolkit for translational research of ultrasound-guided intervention systems , 2012, The MIDAS Journal.