Thirteen theorems in search of the truth

We review recent work on the accuracy of group judgmental processes as a function of (a) the competences (judgmental accuracies) of individual group members, (b) the group decision procedure, and (c) group size. This work on individual competence and group accuracy represents an important contribution to democratic theory and a useful complement to the usual emphasis in the social choice literature on individual preference and preference aggregation mechanisms. The work reported on is rooted in a tradition which goes back to scholars such as Condorcet, Poisson, and Bayes.

[1]  Siméon-Denis Poisson Recherches sur la probabilité des jugements en matière criminelle et en matiére civile, précédées des règles générales du calcul des probabilités , 1837 .

[2]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  Reliable Circuits Using Less Reliable Relays , 1956 .

[3]  G. Granger La mathématique sociale du marquis de Condorcet , 1958 .

[4]  C. L. Mallows,et al.  Individual Choice Behaviour. , 1961 .

[5]  G. Thompson,et al.  The Theory of Committees and Elections. , 1959 .

[6]  W. H. Pierce,et al.  IMPROVING RELIABILITY OF DIGITAL SYSTEMS BY REDUNDANCY AND ADAPTION , 1961 .

[7]  Howard E. Sattler Effect of Group Variability on Pooled Group Decisions , 1966 .

[8]  Michael Taylor,et al.  Critique and comment: Proof of a theorem on majority rule , 1969 .

[9]  Robin Farquharson,et al.  Theory of voting , 1969 .

[10]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  Perceptrons: An Introduction to Computational Geometry , 1969 .

[11]  D. Rae,et al.  Decision-Rules and Individual Values in Constitutional Choice , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Norman Schofield,et al.  Ethical Decision Rules for Uncertain Voters , 1972, British Journal of Political Science.

[13]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  A Study of Poisson's Models for Jury Verdicts in Criminal and Civil Trials , 1973 .

[14]  J. H. Davis Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[15]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[16]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Modeling Jury Verdicts in the American Legal System , 1974 .

[17]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  A comment on ‘democratic theory: A preliminary mathematical model.’ , 1975 .

[18]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Analyzing the Decision-Making Process of the American Jury , 1975 .

[19]  Howard Margolis A note on incompetence , 1976 .

[20]  K. Baker Condorcet. From natural philosophy to social mathematics , 1974, Medical History.

[21]  W. Crain,et al.  Legislative Size and Voting Rules , 1977, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[22]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  Judgmental competence of individuals and groups in a dichotomous choice situation: Is a majority of heads better than one? , 1978 .

[23]  Reid Hastie,et al.  Models of jury decision making: A critical review. , 1979 .

[24]  M. Rothschild,et al.  A Model of the Jury Decision Process , 1979, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[25]  Shmuel Nitzan,et al.  Investment in Human Capital and Social Self Protection under Uncertainty , 1980 .

[26]  Bernard Grofman,et al.  Mathematical Models of Juror and Jury Decision-Making , 1981 .

[27]  Average Competence, Variability in Individual Competence, and Accuracy of Statistically Pooled Group Decisions , 1982 .