From Ideal Data Synchronization to Hybrid Forms of Interconnections: Architectures, Processes, and Data

n frantz.rowe@univ-nantes.fr With the emergence of new technologies, companies can organize their electronic data exchanges by implementing hybrid interorganizational information systems (IOS). This paper presents a new analytical framework by considering IOS as the product of interconnections between the parts of IS developed by connected firms to support a given interorganizational process. We focus on updating internal databases through data synchronization between a set of suppliers and a set of clients. From the literature, we built types of sending and receiving systems based on three variables; namely, shared data, structural linkages, and message interdependency. Analytically, we derived possibilities of interconnections between these sending and receiving systems with asymmetric characteristics. In a field study, we empirically investigated IOS built to support product information flows from suppliers’ to retailers’ internal, databases by considering how suppliers built their sending systems, how retailers built their receiving systems, and how their interconnections led to different forms of IOS. Interconnections occurring between systems with asymmetric characteristics show the existence of several hybrid forms of IOS, both in design and use. We finally explain that, even if companies can benefit from their use, hybrid forms are less efficient than are extreme forms, those that are the result of interconnections between systems with symmetric

[1]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Through a Glass Clearly: Standards, Architecture, and Process Transparency in Global Supply Chains , 2011, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Thomas Y. Choi,et al.  Structural investigation of supply networks: A social network analysis approach , 2011 .

[3]  Arun Rai,et al.  Bridging and Bonding in Exchange Networks: A Structural Embeddedness Perspective of B2B Digital Intermediation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Maria Madlberger Can data quality help overcome the penguin effect? the case of item master data pools , 2011, ECIS.

[6]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Adoption factors of electronic data exchange and technology: can we distinguish two phases? , 2011, ECIS.

[7]  Arun Rai,et al.  Research Commentary - Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Arun Rai,et al.  Leveraging IT Capabilities and Competitive Process Capabilities for the Management of Interorganizational Relationship Portfolios , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Juan Rodon,et al.  Analysing IOIS adoption through structural contradictions , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Ismail Sila,et al.  Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of Internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance? , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Patrick Finnegan,et al.  Intermediaries in inter-organisational networks: building a theory of electronic marketplace performance , 2010 .

[12]  Narcyz Roztocki,et al.  A motivational model for technology-supported cross-organizational and cross-border collaboration , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Daniel Klapper,et al.  A Larger Slice or a Larger Pie? An Empirical Investigation of Bargaining Power in the Distribution Channel , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[14]  Arun Rai,et al.  Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships , 2009, MIS Q..

[15]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Information Technology for Management: Improving Performance in the Digital Economy , 2009 .

[16]  Jonathan Wareham,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Empirical Research on Interorganizational Systems: Assessing Past Contributions and Guiding Future Directions , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Lakshmi S. Iyer,et al.  A Semantic Approach to Secure Collaborative Inter-Organizational eBusiness Processes (SSCIOBP) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Christine Legner,et al.  Toward the Inter-organizational Product Information Supply Chain - Evidence from the Retail and Consumer Goods Industries , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  How CIOs Can Enable Governance of Value Nets , 2008, MIS Q. Executive.

[20]  K. Provan,et al.  Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks , 2007 .

[21]  Christina Soh,et al.  Electronic Marketplaces and Price Transparency: Strategy, Information Technology, and Success , 2006, MIS Q..

[22]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[23]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry , 2006, MIS Q..

[24]  Arun Rai,et al.  Relational Antecedents of Information Flow Integration for Supply Chain Coordination , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Arun Rai,et al.  Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities , 2006 .

[26]  Praveen Aggarwal,et al.  A Typology of Interorganizational Relationships: A Marriage, a Fling, or Something in Between , 2006, Int. J. E Bus. Res..

[27]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Migration to Open-Standard Interorganizational Systems: Network Effects, Switching Costs, and Path Dependency , 2005, MIS Q..

[29]  Duanning Zhou,et al.  Data Synchronization Technology: Standards, Business Values and Implications , 2006, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The business value of digital supply networks: A program of research on the impacts of globalization , 2005 .

[31]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Data exchange in interorganizational relationships: review through multiple conceptual lenses , 2005, DATB.

[32]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  Coordinating for Flexibility in e-Business Supply Chains , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Beyond exchange models: Understanding the structure of B2B information systems , 2004, Inf. Syst. E Bus. Manag..

[34]  Ellen Christiaanse,et al.  Proprietary versus internet technologies and the adoption and impact of electronic marketplaces , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Mani Subramani,et al.  How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships? , 2004, MIS Q..

[36]  Omar El Sawy,et al.  The impact of common e-business interfaces , 2003, CACM.

[37]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  XML - Based Schema Definition for Support of Interorganizational Workflow , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Akhil Kumar,et al.  Leveraging Information Sharing to Increase Supply Chain Configurability , 2003, ICIS.

[39]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Jan Damsgaard,et al.  Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  Integration in Electronic Exchange Environments , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Paradigm Shifts - E-Business and Business/Systems Integration , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[43]  M. Culnan,et al.  Information Privacy Concerns, Procedural Fairness, and Impersonal Trust: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[44]  Christopher P. Holland,et al.  Mixed Mode Network Structures: The Strategic Use of Electronic Communication by Organizations , 1997 .

[45]  M. Bensaou,et al.  Interorganizational Cooperation: The Role of Information Technology an Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Japanese Supplier Relations , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  Vivek Choudhury,et al.  Strategic Choices in the Development of Interorganizational Information Systems , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[48]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Sustainable Collaboration: Managing Conflict and Cooperation in Interorganizational Systems , 1996, MIS Q..

[49]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[50]  Kusum L. Ailawadi,et al.  Market Power and Performance: A Cross-Industry Analysis of Manufacturers and Retailers , 1995 .

[51]  Tridas Mukhopadhyay,et al.  Interdependent Benefits from Interorganizational Systems: Opportunities for Business Partner Reengineering , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[53]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Tools for inventing organizations: toward a handbook of organizational processes , 1993, [1993] Proceedings Second Workshop on Enabling Technologies@m_Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.

[54]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Information Links and Electronic Marketplaces: The Role of Interorganizational Information Systems in Vertical Markets , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  What is coordination theory and how can it help design cooperative work systems? , 1990, CSCW '90.

[56]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[57]  Michael R. Vitale,et al.  Creating Competitive Advantage with Interorganizational Information Systems , 1988, MIS Q..

[58]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies , 1987, CACM.

[59]  Stephanie S. Barrett,et al.  Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems , 1982, MIS Q..