Performance of contemporary surgical risk scores for mitral valve surgery

Risk stratification for mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) is important in the decision‐making for treating several mitral valve disease but is rarely studied. We compared the prognostic utility of EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Score for MVR.

[1]  B. Prendergast.  Faculty of 1000 evaluation for 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2018 .

[2]  T. Wang,et al.  Comparing Performance of Risk Scores for Combined Aortic Valve Replacement and Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery. , 2016, Heart, lung & circulation.

[3]  M. Mack,et al.  Mitral valve disease—current management and future challenges , 2016, The Lancet.

[4]  G. Gamble,et al.  Comparison of Risk Scores for Prediction of Complications following Aortic Valve Replacement. , 2015, Heart, lung & circulation.

[5]  G. Gamble,et al.  Comparison of four contemporary risk models at predicting mortality after aortic valve replacement. , 2015, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  D. Capodanno,et al.  Comparison of three contemporary surgical scores for predicting all-cause mortality of patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system (from the multicenter GRASP-IT registry). , 2015, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  M. Ruel,et al.  Perioperative deaths after mitral valve operations may be overestimated by contemporary risk models. , 2014, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Thoralf M Sundt,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Circulation.

[10]  H. White,et al.  Comparison of four risk scores for contemporary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2014, Heart, lung & circulation.

[11]  M. Poullis,et al.  Validation of EuroSCORE II in a modern cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[12]  G. Pelissero,et al.  Accuracy, calibration and clinical performance of the new EuroSCORE II risk stratification system. , 2013, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[13]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012). , 2012, European heart journal.

[14]  F. Biancari,et al.  Validation of EuroSCORE II in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  Samer A M Nashef,et al.  EuroSCORE II. , 2012, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[16]  J. Gorman,et al.  Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Sean M. O'Brien,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[18]  G. Filippatos,et al.  [Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease]. , 2013, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[19]  J. Gardin,et al.  Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study , 2006, The Lancet.

[20]  S. Nashef,et al.  The logistic EuroSCORE , 2003 .