When the a contrario approach becomes generative

The a contrario approach is a statistical, hypothesis testing based approach to detect geometric meaningful events in images. The general methodology consists in computing the probability of an observed geometric event under a noise model (null hypothesis) $$H_0$$H0 and then declare the event meaningful when this probability is small enough. Generally, the noise model is taken to be the independent uniform distribution on the considered elements. Our aim in this paper will be to question the choice of the noise model: What happens if we “enrich” the noise model? How to characterize the noise models such that there are no meaningful events against them? Among them, what is the one that has maximum entropy? What does a sample of it look like? How is this noise model related to probability distributions on the elements that would produce, with high probability, the same detections? All these questions will be formalized and answered in two different frameworks: the detection of clusters in a set of points and the detection of line segments in an image. The general idea is to capture the perceptual information contained in an image, and then generate new images having the same visual content. We believe that such a generative approach can have applications for instance in image compression or for clutter removal.

[1]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Embedding Gestalt Laws in Markov Random Fields , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Yann Gousseau,et al.  An A Contrario Decision Method for Shape Element Recognition , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[3]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Filters, Random Fields and Maximum Entropy (FRAME): Towards a Unified Theory for Texture Modeling , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  Edge Detection by Helmholtz Principle , 2001, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[5]  Patrick Bouthemy,et al.  An a contrario Decision Framework for Region-Based Motion Detection , 2006, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[6]  A. Witkin,et al.  On the Role of Structure in Vision , 1983 .

[7]  Song-Chun Zhu,et al.  Minimax Entropy Principle and Its Application to Texture Modeling , 1997, Neural Computation.

[8]  F. Cao Application of the Gestalt principles to the detection of good continuations and corners in image level lines , 2004 .

[9]  Agnès Desolneux,et al.  Significant edges in the case of a non-stationary Gaussian noise , 2006, math/0606219.

[10]  D. Mumford,et al.  Pattern Theory: The Stochastic Analysis of Real-World Signals , 2010 .

[11]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis: A Probabilistic Approach , 2007 .

[12]  Julie Delon,et al.  A Unified Framework for Detecting Groups and Application to Shape Recognition , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[13]  William C. Waterhouse,et al.  Do Symmetric Problems Have Symmetric Solutions , 1983 .

[14]  Rafael Grompone von Gioi,et al.  LSD: a Line Segment Detector , 2012, Image Process. Line.

[15]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Reconstructing an image from its local descriptors , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[16]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Human and Machine Vision , 1983 .

[17]  Peter Harremoës,et al.  Binomial and Poisson distributions as maximum entropy distributions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[18]  Julie Delon,et al.  A Nonparametric Approach for Histogram Segmentation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Hermann von Helmholtz,et al.  Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1962 .

[20]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  A Grouping Principle and Four Applications , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Tatsuya Harada,et al.  Image Reconstruction from Bag-of-Visual-Words , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  M. Payton,et al.  Bounds for the difference between median and mean of beta and negative binomial distributions , 1989 .

[23]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  Meaningful Alignments , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[24]  Yann Gousseau,et al.  Beyond Independence: An Extension of the A Contrario Decision Procedure , 2012, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[25]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  Computational gestalts and perception thresholds , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[26]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition , 2012 .

[27]  Rafael Grompone von Gioi,et al.  LSD: A Fast Line Segment Detector with a False Detection Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[29]  Patrick Pérez,et al.  Poisson image editing , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[30]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  From Gestalt Theory to Image Analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Laura Igual,et al.  Automatic low baseline stereo in urban areas , 2007 .

[32]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  A-contrario Detectability of Spots in Textured Backgrounds , 2009, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[33]  L. Moisan,et al.  Maximal meaningful events and applications to image analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Lionel Moisan,et al.  A Probabilistic Criterion to Detect Rigid Point Matches Between Two Images and Estimate the Fundamental Matrix , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[35]  Julie Delon,et al.  Automatic color palette , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[36]  R. Kaas,et al.  Mean, Median and Mode in Binomial Distributions , 1980 .

[37]  T. Troscianko,et al.  AI and the eye , 1990 .

[38]  H. D. Brunk,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION FOR SAMPLING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION , 1955 .