RAPELD: A MODIFICATION OF THE GENTRY METHOD FOR BIODIVERSITY SURVEYS IN LONG-TERM ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH SITES.

Our objectives were to develop a method that would be appropriate for long-term ecological studies, but that would permit rapid surveys to evaluate biotic complementarity and land-use planning in Amazonia. The Amazon basin covers about 7 million km2. Therefore, even a sparse coverage, with one sample site per 10.000 km2, would require about 700 sampling sites. Financial considerations limit the number of sites and investment at each site, but incomplete coverage makes evaluation of biotic complementarity difficult or impossible (Reddy & Davalos 2003). Our next challenge is to install similar systems throughout Amazonia. The cost, based on modification of Al Gentry's original design is moderate (less than US$ 50.000 per site if it is not necessary to immediately identify all vascular plants in plots) and we can obtain RAP results for most taxa in the short term at much lower cost. However, biological surveys will only be relevant if the local people participate and the surveys serve as much to teach the local communities about the value of their natural resources as they serve to teach the international community about biodiversity. Therefore, we want to see each site run as a long-term ecological research project by local people and institutions. Biological surveys are an important tool in land-use planning, but only the local people can implement those plans.

[1]  W. Magnusson,et al.  Spatial patterns in the understorey shrub genus Psychotria in central Amazonia: effects of distance and topography , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[2]  William E. Magnusson,et al.  Statistics without Math , 2004 .

[3]  S. Reddy,et al.  Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa , 2003 .

[4]  O. Phillips,et al.  Efficient plot-based floristic assessment of tropical forests , 2003, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[5]  Kalle Ruokolainen,et al.  LINKING FLORISTIC PATTERNS WITH SOIL HETEROGENEITY AND SATELLITE IMAGERY IN ECUADORIAN AMAZONIA , 2003 .

[6]  D. Chessel,et al.  ECOLOGICAL-NICHE FACTOR ANALYSIS: HOW TO COMPUTE HABITAT-SUITABILITY MAPS WITHOUT ABSENCE DATA? , 2002 .

[7]  K. J. Wessels,et al.  A multicriteria approach to reserve selection: addressing long-term biodiversity maintenance , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[8]  O. Phillips,et al.  A comparison of fine-scale distribution patterns of four plant groups in an Amazonian rainforest. , 2000 .

[9]  David B. Clark,et al.  EDAPHIC FACTORS AND THE LANDSCAPE-SCALE DISTRIBUTIONS OF TROPICAL RAIN FOREST TREES , 1999 .

[10]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING RATES OF LOCAL SPECIES EXTINCTION, COLONIZATION, AND TURNOVER IN ANIMAL COMMUNITIES , 1998 .

[11]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation: questions and propositions in the linear modelling framework , 1998, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[12]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1994 .

[13]  H. Tuomisto,et al.  Distribution of Pteridophyta and Melastomataceae along an edaphic gradient in an Amazonian rain forest , 1994 .

[14]  C. V. Castilho.  VARIAÇÃO ESPACIAL E TEMPORAL DA BIOMASSA ARBÓREA VIVA EM 64 KM 2 DE FLORESTA DE TERRA-FIRME NA AMAZÔNIA CENTRAL , 2004 .

[15]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[16]  L. G. Lohmann,et al.  Flora da Reserva Ducke. Guia de identificacao das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazonia Central , 1999 .

[17]  J. Comiskey,et al.  Field comparisons of two rapid vegetation assessment techniques with permanent plot inventory data in Amazonian Peru. , 1998 .

[18]  A. Gentry,et al.  Patterns of neotropical plant species diversity. , 1982 .

[19]  Gordon C. Grigg,et al.  A Double-Survey Estimate Of Population Size From Incomplete Counts , 1978 .