Generalized framework for stimulus artifact removal

Stimulation is extensively used in neuroscience research in diverse fields ranging from cognitive to clinical. Studying the effect of electrical and magnetic stimulation on neuronal activity is complicated by large stimulation-derived artifacts on the recording electrodes, which mask the spiking activity. Multiple studies have suggested a variety of solutions for the removal of artifacts and were typically directed at specific stimulation setups. In this study we introduce a generalized framework for stimulus artifacts removal, the Stimulus Artifact Removal Graphical Environment (SARGE). The framework provides an encapsulated environment for a multi-stage removal process, starting from the stimulus pulse detection, through estimation of the artifacts and their removal, and finally to signal reconstruction and the assessment of removal quality. The framework provides the user with subjective graphical and objective quantitative tools for assessing the resulting signal, and the ability to adjust the process to optimize the results. This extendable publicly available framework supports different types of stimulation, stimulation patterns and shapes, and a variety of artifact estimation methods. We exemplify the removal of artifacts generated by electrical micro- and macro-stimulation and magnetic stimulation and different stimulation protocols. The use of different estimation methods, such as averaging and function fitting is demonstrated, and the differences between them are discussed. Finally, the quality of removal is assessed and validated using quantitative measures and combined experimental-simulation studies. The framework marks a shift from "algorithm" and "data" centric approach to a "workflow" centric approach, thus introducing an innovative concept to the artifact removal process.

[1]  He Huang,et al.  Methods for isolating extracellular action potentials and removing stimulus artifacts from microelectrode recordings of neurons requiring minimal operator intervention , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[2]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[3]  Takao Hashimoto,et al.  A template subtraction method for stimulus artifact removal in high-frequency deep brain stimulation , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Shlomo Elias,et al.  Complex Locking Rather Than Complete Cessation of Neuronal Activity in the Globus Pallidus of a 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primate in Response to Pallidal Microstimulation , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Daniel R. Merrill,et al.  Electrical stimulation of excitable tissue: design of efficacious and safe protocols , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  A. Benabid,et al.  Acute and long-term effects of subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease. , 1994, Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Dostrovsky,et al.  Microstimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal firing in human globus pallidus. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  Controlling Bursting in Cortical Cultures with Closed-Loop Multi-Electrode Stimulation , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Izhar Bar-Gad,et al.  Short-Term Depression of Synaptic Transmission during Stimulation in the Globus Pallidus of 1-Methyl-4-Phenyl-1,2,3,6-Tetrahydropyridine-Treated Primates , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Antonio P Strafella,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex influences the neuronal activity of subthalamic nucleus , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Daniel R Cleary,et al.  Deep brain stimulation does not silence neurons in subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's patients. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Bruce C. Wheeler,et al.  Stimulus-Artifact Elimination in a Multi-Electrode System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[13]  M. Delong,et al.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Neurologic and Neuropsychiatric Disorders , 2006, Neuron.

[14]  Derek T O'Keeffe,et al.  Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm , 2001, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  James B. Fallon,et al.  A novel stimulus artifact removal technique for high-rate electrical stimulation , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Thomas Wichmann,et al.  A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  J. Vitek,et al.  Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus Changes the Firing Pattern of Pallidal Neurons , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  Steve M. Potter,et al.  Real-time multi-channel stimulus artifact suppression by local curve fitting , 2002, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  A. Moran,et al.  Revealing neuronal functional organization through the relation between multi-scale oscillatory extracellular signals , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  G W Harding,et al.  A method for eliminating the stimulus artifact from digital recordings of the direct cortical response. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.