The play of power and politics in innovation and HRM

This paper analyses the human resource management (HRM) practices involved in the implementation of a process innovation approach to product development (concurrent engineering (CE)) in the Australian subsidiary of a multinational firm engaged in military defence electronics. According to the research literature, almost all aspects of managing product development under a CE approach are linked to people management. Yet in this particular case, other than project team structure, the prescriptive HRM dimensions of CE were conspicuously absent in the implementation process. This absence is explained by the play of power and politics involving stakeholders analysed over an 18 month period. The implications of this analysis for understanding the embedded, interdependent and political nature of HRM and process innovation are addressed.

[1]  S. Kuruvilla,et al.  International HRM: national business systems, organizational politics and the international division of labour in MNCs , 2005 .

[2]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  What machines can't do : politics and technology in the industrial enterprise , 1995 .

[3]  Lars Trygg,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Practices in Selected Swedish Companies: A Movement or an Activity of the Few? , 1993 .

[4]  Barbara Townley,et al.  Reframing Human Resource Management: Power, Ethics and the Subject at Work , 1994 .

[5]  D. Coghlan Power, Politics and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game , 2001 .

[6]  C. Hardy Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change , 1996 .

[7]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[8]  W. McCourt,et al.  The politics of HRM: waiting for Godot in the Moroccan civil service , 2004 .

[9]  J. Fagerberg Innovation: A Guide to the Literature , 2003 .

[10]  F. Mavondo,et al.  Learning orientation and market orientation: relationship with innovation, human resource practices and performance , 2005 .

[11]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  The influence of innovation orientation in human resource management on new product development: The moderating role of innovation type , 1996 .

[12]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[13]  G. R. Ferris,et al.  Human Resource Department Power and Influence Through Symbolic Action , 1997 .

[14]  N. Denzin,et al.  The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2007 .

[15]  Stuart Bennett,et al.  What Machines Can’t Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial Enterprise by Robert J. Thomas (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[16]  Gerald I. Susman,et al.  Test of a model of organizational contributors to product development team effectiveness , 1999 .

[17]  C. J. Haddad Operationalizing the concept of concurrent engineering: a case study from the US auto industry , 1996 .

[18]  Tanya Bondarouk,et al.  Hr Contribution to it Innovation Implementation: Results of Three Case Studies , 2005 .

[19]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing New Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality (Революция в разработке продуктов: количественный скачок в скорости, эффективности и качестве) , 1992 .

[20]  Jules Townshend,et al.  Power, A Radical View , 2007 .

[21]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[22]  K. Legge,et al.  Power, innovation, and problem-solving in personnel management , 1978 .

[23]  Richard Badham,et al.  The role of human resource management in concurrent engineering approaches to product innovation: Australian and Indonesian experiences , 1998 .

[24]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice , 1998 .

[25]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Shortening Lead Time through Early Problem Solving A New Round of Capability-Building Competition in the Auto Industry , 2000 .

[26]  John Storey,et al.  Managers of Innovation: Insights into Making Innovation Happen , 2004 .

[27]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[28]  Steven Dhondt,et al.  Human factors in organizational design and management-VI : Proceedings of the sixth International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management held in the Hague, the Netherlands, August 19-22, 1998 , 1998 .

[29]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Organizational Politics , 1979 .

[30]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Special Issue on Concurrent Engineering - Guest Editorial , 1996 .

[31]  Alan Fell,et al.  Evaluating the Personnel Function , 1986 .

[32]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Effectiveness: Integrating Product Development Across Organizations , 1997 .

[33]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Building high performing engineering project teams , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[34]  Patrick Dawson,et al.  Organizational change : a processual approach , 1994 .

[35]  Don Clausing Total quality development : a step-by-step guide to world class concurrent engineering , 1994 .

[36]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[37]  Jan de Leede,et al.  Innovation and HRM: Towards an Integrated Framework , 2005 .

[38]  O. Hauptman,et al.  The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams , 1996 .

[39]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Evaluating failure in the innovation process: the micropolitics of new product development , 1999 .

[40]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Composite forms of organization as a strategy for concurrent engineering effectiveness , 1996 .

[41]  Andrew Pettigrew The Influence Process between Specialists and Executives , 1974 .