Nursing documentation in nursing homes--state-of-the-art and implications for quality improvement.

This study was designed to gain information on the quality of nursing care based on the comments in nursing records. The specific aims of the study were to find out if the patients' (i) individual needs are assessed, the goals for nursing care are set, and the nursing interventions are determined; (ii) if the patients' needs are met and (iii) if goal achievement is regularly evaluated by including comments in nursing documents. In addition, the study aimed to describe the up-to-dateness of nursing care plans as well as the frequency of making daily notes. The data were collected on 36 wards of four residential homes. A 30% sample of the nursing documents on each ward was collected (n=332) using the Senior Monitor instrument. The documents studied were mainly nursing care plans and daily note sheets. Seventy-three per cent of the nursing home residents had an up-to-date nursing care plan at the time of data collection. The main results demonstrated that a written statement on the patient's mental ability was lacking in every fourth document although 75% of the patients suffer from at least moderate dementia in Finnish long-term care institutions. Development activities should also be targeted to the documentation of clear and concrete means by which patients' independent functioning is supported. In addition, evaluation was the area that warranted attention and development activities since only every fourth record included information on changes in the patients' functional capability. Although a lot of in-service training has been focused on improving the documentation practices, there is still a need for development. The means by which knowledge is transferred to guide the practice should be carefully considered. Also forms should be developed to meet the special requirements for recording nursing care in long-term care settings.

[1]  I. Norman,et al.  Monitor and Senior Monitor: problems of administration and some proposed solutions. , 1992, Journal of Advanced Nursing.

[2]  I. Norman,et al.  The validity of two quality assessment instruments: Monitor and Senior Monitor. , 1996, International journal of nursing studies.

[3]  A. Martin,et al.  Documentation practices of nurses in long-term care. , 1999, Journal of clinical nursing.

[4]  K. Junttila,et al.  Perioperative documentation in Finland. , 2000, AORN journal.

[5]  T. A. Stokke,et al.  Structure and content in Norwegian nursing care documentation. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[6]  I. Thorell-Ekstrand,et al.  Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[7]  Patient records in nursing homes. Effects of training on content and comprehensiveness. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[8]  A. Ehrenberg,et al.  Patient problems, needs, and nursing diagnoses in Swedish nursing home records. , 1999, Nursing diagnosis : ND : the official journal of the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.

[9]  G. Ljunggren,et al.  Review of nursing documentation in nursing home wards - changes after intervention for individualized care. , 1999, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  E. Souder,et al.  Nursing documentation versus standardized assessment of cognitive status in hospitalized medical patients. , 2000, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[11]  M Ehnfors,et al.  The accuracy of patient records in Swedish nursing homes: congruence of record content and nurses' and patients' descriptions. , 2001, Scandinavian journal of caring sciences.

[12]  M. Mashru,et al.  Interpractice audit of diagnosis and management of hypertension in primary care: educational intervention and review of medical records , 1997, BMJ.

[13]  R. Taunton,et al.  Evaluation of a scale to assess nurses' attitudes toward written care plans. , 1989, Applied nursing research : ANR.