Retrospective study of carmustine or lomustine with bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients who have failed prior bevacizumab.

BACKGROUND Currently, there are no known effective treatments for recurrent glioblastoma once patients have progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen. We examined the efficacy of adding nitrosoureas to bevacizumab in patients who progressed while on an initial bevacizumab-containing regimen. METHODS In this retrospective study, we identified adult patients with histologically confirmed glioblastoma (WHO grade IV) who were treated with lomustine or carmustine in combination with bevacizumab as a second or third regimen after failing an alternative initial bevacizumab-containing regimen. Response rate (RR), 6-month progression free survival (PFS6), and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed for each treatment. RESULTS Forty-two patients were identified (28 males) with a median age of 49 years (range, 24-78 y). Of 42 patients, 28 received lomustine (n = 22) or carmustine (n = 6) with bevacizumab as their second bevacizumab-containing regimen, and 14 received lomustine (n = 11) or carmustine (n = 3) as their third bevacizumab-containing regimen. While the median PFS for the initial bevacizumab-containing regimen was 16.3 weeks, the median PFS for the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen was 6.3 weeks. Patients had an RR of 44% and a PFS6 rate of 26% during the initial bevacizumab regimen and an RR of 0% and a PFS6 rate of 3% during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen. There was increased grade 3-4 toxicity (45% vs 19%, P = .010) during the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen relative to the initial bevacizumab regimen. Median overall survival was 18.7 weeks from initiation of the nitrosourea-containing bevacizumab regimen. CONCLUSION The addition of lomustine or carmustine to bevacizumab after a patient has already progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen does not appear to provide benefit for most patients and is associated with additional toxicity with the doses used in this cohort.

[1]  H. Fine,et al.  Meta‐analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults , 1993, Cancer.

[2]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  H. Poulsen,et al.  Irinotecan and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme , 2011, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[4]  P. Wen,et al.  Bevacizumab for recurrent malignant gliomas , 2008, Neurology.

[5]  R. Beroukhim,et al.  Retrospective study of dasatinib for recurrent glioblastoma after bevacizumab failure , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[6]  Santosh Kesari,et al.  Malignant gliomas in adults. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Corticosteroid use in patients with glioblastoma at first or second relapse treated with bevacizumab in the BRAIN study. , 2010, The oncologist.

[9]  R. Vernhout,et al.  A randomized phase II study of bevacizumab versus bevacizumab plus lomustine versus lomustine single agent in recurrent glioblastoma: The Dutch BELOB study. , 2013 .

[10]  M. member Randomized trial of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine in the adjuvant treatment of high-grade astrocytoma: a medical research council trial. , 2001 .

[11]  N. Bleehen,et al.  An overview of published results from randomized studies of nitrosoureas in primary high grade malignant glioma. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  M. Chamberlain Role for cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma progressing on bevacizumab: a retrospective case series , 2012, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[13]  P. Wen,et al.  An exploratory survival analysis of anti-angiogenic therapy for recurrent malignant glioma , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[14]  John A Butman,et al.  Phase II trial of single-agent bevacizumab followed by bevacizumab plus irinotecan at tumor progression in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M. Chamberlain Emerging clinical principles on the use of bevacizumab for the treatment of malignant gliomas , 2010, Cancer.

[16]  Alexander Radbruch,et al.  Progression types after antiangiogenic therapy are related to outcome in recurrent glioblastoma , 2014, Neurology.

[17]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. Unterberg,et al.  Towards optimizing the sequence of bevacizumab and nitrosoureas in recurrent malignant glioma , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[19]  M J Gleason,et al.  Outcomes and prognostic factors in recurrent glioma patients enrolled onto phase II clinical trials. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  A. Friedman,et al.  Bevacizumab continuation beyond initial bevacizumab progression among recurrent glioblastoma patients , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[21]  John Sampson,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  W. Mason,et al.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  P. Wen,et al.  Role of a second chemotherapy in recurrent malignant glioma patients who progress on bevacizumab. , 2009, Neuro-oncology.

[24]  M. Fabrini,et al.  Bevacizumab and fotemustine for recurrent glioblastoma: a phase II study of AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology) , 2013, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[25]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Bevacizumab alone and in combination with irinotecan in recurrent glioblastoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.