Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search

To perform visual search, humans, like many mammals, encode a large field of view with retinas having variable spatial resolution, and then use high-speed eye movements to direct the highest-resolution region, the fovea, towards potential target locations. Good search performance is essential for survival, and hence mammals may have evolved efficient strategies for selecting fixation locations. Here we address two questions: what are the optimal eye movement strategies for a foveated visual system faced with the problem of finding a target in a cluttered environment, and do humans employ optimal eye movement strategies during a search? We derive the ideal bayesian observer for search tasks in which a target is embedded at an unknown location within a random background that has the spectral characteristics of natural scenes. Our ideal searcher uses precise knowledge about the statistics of the scenes in which the target is embedded, and about its own visual system, to make eye movements that gain the most information about target location. We find that humans achieve nearly optimal search performance, even though humans integrate information poorly across fixations. Analysis of the ideal searcher reveals that there is little benefit from perfect integration across fixations—much more important is efficient processing of information on each fixation. Apparently, evolution has exploited this fact to achieve efficient eye movement strategies with minimal neural resources devoted to memory.

[1]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[2]  Andrew Rambaut,et al.  Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[3]  Donald Geman,et al.  An Active Testing Model for Tracking Roads in Satellite Images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  David E. Irwin Information integration across saccadic eye movements , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  A. Yuille,et al.  Object perception as Bayesian inference. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  O. Mimura [Eye movements]. , 1992, Nippon Ganka Gakkai zasshi.

[8]  N. Gemmell,et al.  Mother's curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  A Bayesian approach to the evolution of perceptual and cognitive systems , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  Why use noise? , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.

[12]  J. A. Zeh,et al.  Sexy sons: a dead end for cytoplasmic genes , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[13]  W. W. Peterson,et al.  The theory of signal detectability , 1954, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[14]  W. Atchley,et al.  Quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogeny: I. Ontogenetic changes in quantitative genetic variance components in randombred mice , 1983 .

[15]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Active vision , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination. , 1981, Science.

[17]  G. Legge,et al.  Mr. Chips 2002: new insights from an ideal-observer model of reading , 2002, Vision Research.

[18]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[19]  N. Royle,et al.  The effect of variation in dietary intake on maternal deposition of antioxidants in zebra finch eggs , 2003 .

[20]  N. Newman The Visual Neurosciences , 2005 .

[21]  A E Burgess,et al.  Visual signal detection. II. Signal-location identification. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article EYE MOVEMENTS REVEAL THE SPATIOTEMPORAL DYNAMICS OE VISUAL SEARCH , 2022 .

[23]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[24]  S. Liversedge,et al.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  J. Findlay Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[26]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.

[27]  J. P. Thomas,et al.  A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  B. Dosher,et al.  Characterizing human perceptual inefficiencies with equivalent internal noise. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  D. Ballard,et al.  Task constraints in visual working memory , 1997, Vision Research.

[30]  M. Eckstein,et al.  Quantifying the Performance Limits of Human Saccadic Targeting during Visual Search , 2001, Perception.