Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi- detector row CT coronary angiography.

Coronary angiography is increasingly performed with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the clinical setting. Successful use of this method, however, depends on the radiologist's knowledge of its potential pitfalls and familiarity with methods for minimizing or avoiding them. To identify artifacts and other pitfalls that commonly degrade image quality and that could result in misinterpretation, contrast-enhanced coronary angiograms acquired with a multi-detector row CT scanner with four detector rows in 110 consecutive patients were analyzed. The problems identified were classified into four broad categories: (a) motion-related artifacts caused by cardiac, pulmonary, or other body motion; (b) beam-hardening effects caused by metallic implants, severe calcifications, or air bubbles in the pulmonary artery that obscured the underlying coronary vessel lumen; (c) structural artifacts produced by adjacent contrast material-filled structures and overlying vessels; and (d) artifacts that resulted from technical errors or limitations. The most frequently observed artifacts were those related to cardiac motion. The most effective methods for minimizing cardiac motion artifacts are (a) premedication with beta-blockers to maintain optimal heart rate during scanning and (b) optimal selection of the reconstruction window.

[1]  H Anno,et al.  Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[2]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Comparison of three-dimensional coronary magnetic resonance angiography with x-ray angiography for detection of coronary artery stenoses , 2001 .

[3]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Investigation of aortocoronary artery bypass grafts by multislice spiral computed tomography with electrocardiographic-gated image reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  W. Frishman,et al.  Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Multislice Computed Tomography , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Ikari,et al.  Effects of competitive blood flow on arterial graft patency and diameter. Medium-term postoperative follow-up. , 1996, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[6]  H Hu,et al.  Multi-slice helical CT: scan and reconstruction. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  C. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of in‐plane motion of the coronary arteries during the cardiac cycle: Implications for acquisition window duration for MR flow quantification , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Raimund Erbel,et al.  Update on myocardial bridging. , 2002, Circulation.

[9]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  Werner Moshage,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses by Contrast-Enhanced, Retrospectively Electrocardiographically-Gated, Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  H. Takemura,et al.  Is internal thoracic artery grafting suitable for a moderately stenotic coronary artery , 1996 .

[12]  T. H. Wiese,et al.  Coronary artery bypass grafts: improved electron-beam tomography by prolonging breath holds with preoxygenation. , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  C. White,et al.  Usefulness of multislice spiral computed tomography angiography for determination of coronary artery stenoses. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  W Moshage,et al.  In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[15]  W A Kalender,et al.  ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  C Georg,et al.  Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. , 2001, Radiology.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  C H McCollough,et al.  Performance evaluation of a multi-slice CT system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[19]  M. Budoff,et al.  Coronary artery motion in electron beam tomography. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  C H McCollough,et al.  Motion artifacts in subsecond conventional CT and electron-beam CT: pictorial demonstration of temporal resolution. , 2000, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  Pedro A. Lemos,et al.  Reliable Noninvasive Coronary Angiography With Fast Submillimeter Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography , 2003, Herz.

[23]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  H. Suma.  Internal thoracic artery and competitive flow. , 1991, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  K. Taguchi,et al.  Algorithm for image reconstruction in multi-slice helical CT. , 1998, Medical physics.

[26]  B. Brundage,et al.  Variation of heart rate and electrocardiograph trigger interval during ultrafast computed tomography. , 1996, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[27]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[28]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  P. Serruys,et al.  Large thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale of the atrial septum, which apparently “disappeared” without embolic events , 2002, Heart.