Sensitivity of California Thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum) to song syntax

Abstract Many birds have songs with variable structure and sequences. In earlier studies, we characterized some features from the song structures of California Thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum). In the Thrashers, there were a large number of phrase types, dozens to hundreds and the songs that were sequences of these many phrases were not random, but show some structure referred to as syntax. For example, a syntactic rule might be that phrase type A can be followed by phrase type B, but not type C. We, along with others, have assumed that syntax is an important feature of songs. This paper describes an experimental attempt to determine that syntax is important to California Thrashers by recording the reaction of territorial thrashers to playbacks of other thrasher songs, some of which obeyed the syntax rules we had discovered while others violated those rules. We also obtained video recordings of their behaviour near the playback speakers. We observed differences in the reactions to the birds that heard these two types of playbacks. Resident males reacted to either playback type, but more strongly when the original order was preserved. We observed difference in their behavioural response to correct or altered syntax. This indicates that the syntax of their songs is perceived in territorial defence by the birds.

[1]  Robert E. Lemon,et al.  Organization of song of rose-breasted grosbeaks , 1973 .

[2]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Structure, syntax and “small-world” organization in the complex songs of California Thrashers (Toxostoma redivivum) , 2016 .

[3]  Richard W. Hedley Composition and sequential organization of song repertoires in Cassin’s Vireo (Vireo cassinii) , 2015, Journal of Ornithology.

[4]  Constance Scharff,et al.  The use of network analysis to study complex animal communication systems: a study on nightingale song , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  Does true syntax or simple auditory object support the role of skylark song dialect? , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[7]  Çağlar Akçay,et al.  Song type matching is an honest early threat signal in a hierarchical animal communication system , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Design of Playback Experiments: The Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus , 1992 .

[9]  H. Williams,et al.  Syllable chunking in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song. , 1992, Journal of comparative psychology.

[10]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Structural Design Principles of Complex Bird Songs: A Network-Based Approach , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[12]  Douglas A. Nelson,et al.  Feature Weighting in Species Song Recognition By the Field Sparrow (Spizella Pusilla) , 1988 .

[13]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[14]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[15]  Torben Dabelsteen,et al.  Coding in the song of the wren: importance of rhythmicity, syntax and element structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  Stephen T. Emlen,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of the Parameters of Bird Song Eliciting Species Recognition , 1972 .

[17]  J. Schank,et al.  Pseudoreplication is a pseudoproblem. , 2009, Journal of comparative psychology.

[18]  P. Laiolo,et al.  Song characterization in the spectacled warbler (Sylvia conspicillata): a circum-Mediterranean species with a complex song structure , 2012 .

[19]  J. C. Bremond,et al.  Recherches sur la sémantique et les éléments vecteurs d’information dans les signaux acoustiques du rouge-gorge (Erithacus Rubecula L.) , 1968, La Terre et La Vie, Revue d'Histoire naturelle.

[20]  Martine Pellerin The Role of Silences and Elements in the Recognition of a Dialect in the Corn Bunting , 1982 .

[21]  E. Balaban,et al.  Bird song syntax: learned intraspecific variation is meaningful. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Playback and Studies of Animal Communication , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[23]  L. Phillmore,et al.  Repertoire composition and singing behaviour in two eastern populations of the Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus) , 2012 .

[24]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[25]  David Rothenberg,et al.  Investigation of musicality in birdsong , 2014, Hearing Research.