Knowledge Management and Professional Work

Current theories of knowledge management postulate a cycle of knowledge creation, refinement, and implementation that hinges on the transformation of tacit, or practical, into explicit, or discursive, knowledge. Using field research in Denmark and Japan as illustration, the authors argue for a richer view of knowledge than simply the conversion of individual knowledge into a form susceptible to transmission. Knowledge, they show, is relative to what Lave and Wenger call communities of practice. The key to understanding the generation and sharing of knowledge, the authors argue, is the role of text as both knowledge representation (product) and the means by which communities sustain organization (process). The modern organization, because it is characterized by diverse local practices, and by the increasing salience of professional work, is thus a complex mosaic of situated knowledge, grounded in process. The authors consider the implication of this diversity for managerial practice in a knowledge-based society.

[1]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  John M. Silvester,et al.  The Social Life of Information: Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2000). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing. ISBN 0-87584-762-5. 320 pages , 2000, Internet High. Educ..

[3]  M. Halliday,et al.  Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective , 1989 .

[4]  Humberto R. Maturana,et al.  Science and Daily Life: The Ontology of Scientific Explanations , 1990 .

[5]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[6]  Subba Narasimha,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE, HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: TOWARD A FRAMEWORK , 2000 .

[7]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[10]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structuring of Organizations , 1979 .

[11]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[12]  Varun Grover,et al.  General Perspectives on Knowledge Management: Fostering a Research Agenda , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  James R. Taylor,et al.  The Justification of Knowledge , 2002 .

[14]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Knowledge emergence : social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation , 2001 .

[17]  J. Orr,et al.  Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. , 1997 .

[18]  T. Gladwin.  Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1981 .

[19]  Edward K. Morris,et al.  The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America , 2002 .

[20]  Douglas K. Smith,et al.  Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented, Then Ignored, the First Personal Computer , 1988 .

[21]  Alice Lam.  Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Societal Institutions: An Integrated Framework , 2000 .

[22]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[23]  Raman Ragumaran,et al.  A Critical Review Of Knowledge Management Models , 2001 .

[24]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[25]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[26]  Jaakko Virkkunen,et al.  Knowledge Management–the Second Generation: Creating Competencies with and Between Work Communities in the Compentence Laboratory , 2000 .

[27]  P. Carroll.  Big Blues: The Unmaking of IBM , 1993 .