A unified Lagrangian formulation for solid and fluid dynamics and its possibility for modelling submarine landslides and their consequences

Abstract Consequences of submarine landslides include both their direct impact on offshore infrastructure, such as subsea electric cables and gas/oil pipelines, and their indirect impact via the generated tsunami. The simulation of submarine landslides and their consequences has been a long-standing challenge majorly due to the strong coupling among sliding sediments, seawater and infrastructure as well as the induced extreme material deformation during the complete process. In this paper, we propose a unified finite element formulation for solid and fluid dynamics based on a generalised Hellinger–Reissner variational principle so that the coupling of fluid and solid can be achieved naturally in a monolithic fashion. In order to tackle extreme deformation problems, the resulting formulation is implemented within the framework of the particle finite element method. The correctness and robustness of the proposed unified formulation for single-phase problems (e.g. fluid dynamics problems involving Newtonian/Non-Newtonian flows and solid dynamics problems) as well as for multi-phase problems (e.g. two-phase flows) are verified against benchmarks. Comparisons are carried out against numerical and analytical solutions or experimental data that are available in the literature. Last but not least, the possibility of the proposed approach for modelling submarine landslides and their consequences is demonstrated via a numerical experiment of an underwater slope stability problem. It is shown that the failure and post-failure processes of the underwater slope can be predicted in a single simulation with its direct threat to a nearby pipeline and indirect threat by generating tsunami being estimated as well.

[1]  Antonio Gens,et al.  Numerical simulation of undrained insertion problems in geotechnical engineering with the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) , 2017 .

[2]  B. McAdoo,et al.  Submarine landslide geomorphology, US continental slope , 2000 .

[3]  S. Shao,et al.  INCOMPRESSIBLE SPH METHOD FOR SIMULATING NEWTONIAN AND NON-NEWTONIAN FLOWS WITH A FREE SURFACE , 2003 .

[4]  Peter Gauer,et al.  The last phase of the Storegga Slide: simulation of retrogressive slide dynamics and comparison with slide-scar morphology , 2005 .

[5]  J. C. Cante,et al.  On the numerical modeling of granular material flows via the Particle Finite Element Method (PFEM) , 2015 .

[6]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Second-order cone programming formulation for consolidation analysis of saturated porous media , 2016, Computational Mechanics.

[7]  P. Vigneaux,et al.  Augmented Lagrangian simulations study of yield-stress fluid flows in expansion-contraction and comparisons with physical experiments , 2017 .

[8]  H. Bui,et al.  Explicit incompressible SPH algorithm for free-surface flow modelling: A comparison with weakly compressible schemes , 2016 .

[9]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  A 3D upper bound limit analysis using radial point interpolation meshless method and second-order cone programming: 3D LIMIT ANALYSIS USING RADIAL POINT INTERPOLATION MESHLESS METHOD , 2016 .

[10]  Philip Watts,et al.  The Sissano, Papua New Guinea tsunami of July 1998 — offshore evidence on the source mechanism , 2001 .

[11]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Multi-fluid flows with the Particle Finite Element Method , 2009 .

[12]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Analysis of some partitioned algorithms for fluid‐structure interaction , 2010 .

[13]  Michael L. Overton,et al.  Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods for Semidefinite Programming: Convergence Rates, Stability and Numerical Results , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[14]  Eugenio Oñate Ibáñez de Navarra,et al.  Numerical modelling of landslide-generated waves with the particle finite element method (PFEM) and a non-Newtonian flow model , 2015 .

[15]  Andrei V. Lyamin,et al.  Computational plasticity algorithm for particle dynamics simulations , 2018 .

[16]  Lionel Carter,et al.  Insights into Submarine Geohazards from Breaks in Subsea Telecommunication Cables , 2014 .

[17]  Xue Zhang,et al.  3D numerical simulation of free-surface Bingham fluids interacting with structures using the PFEM , 2018, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  D. Dinkler,et al.  A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction using space–time finite elements , 2004 .

[19]  Chris Martin,et al.  Upper bound limit analysis using simplex strain elements and second‐order cone programming , 2007 .

[20]  Yoshihiro Kanno,et al.  Second-order cone programming with warm start for elastoplastic analysis with von Mises yield criterion , 2012 .

[21]  van Eh Harald Brummelen,et al.  A monolithic approach to fluid–structure interaction , 2004 .

[22]  G. Georgiou,et al.  The PAL (Penalized Augmented Lagrangian) method for computing viscoplastic flows: A new fast converging scheme , 2018, Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics.

[23]  Daichao Sheng,et al.  A discrete numerical method for brittle rocks using mathematical programming , 2017 .

[24]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Discrete modelling jointed rock slopes using mathematical programming methods , 2017 .

[25]  Ha H. Bui,et al.  Lagrangian meshfree particles method (SPH) for large deformation and failure flows of geomaterial using elastic–plastic soil constitutive model , 2008 .

[26]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  A C2 continuous approximation to the Mohr-Coulomb yield surface , 2011 .

[27]  Huidong Yang,et al.  Robust and efficient monolithic fluid‐structure‐interaction solvers , 2016 .

[28]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Quasi-static collapse of two-dimensional granular columns: insight from continuum modelling , 2016 .

[29]  Mark Randolph,et al.  A dynamic large deformation finite element method based on mesh regeneration , 2013 .

[30]  Anders Elverhøi,et al.  Hydroplaning and submarine debris flows , 2004 .

[31]  H. Jostad,et al.  Progressive failures in eastern Canadian and Scandinavian sensitive clays , 2011 .

[32]  S. Sloan,et al.  Formulation and solution of some plasticity problems as conic programs , 2007 .

[33]  Hung Nguyen-Xuan,et al.  Upper and lower bound limit analysis of plates using FEM and second-order cone programming , 2010 .

[34]  Georgios C. Georgiou,et al.  Numerical simulations of cessation flows of a Bingham plastic with the augmented Lagrangian method , 2010 .

[35]  K. Soga,et al.  Modeling of large-deformation behaviour of marine sensitive clays and its application to submarine slope stability analysis , 2016 .

[36]  E. Oñate,et al.  The particle finite element method. An overview , 2004 .

[37]  Erling D. Andersen,et al.  On implementing a primal-dual interior-point method for conic quadratic optimization , 2003, Math. Program..

[38]  P. Wriggers,et al.  An interior‐point algorithm for elastoplasticity , 2007 .

[39]  Kristian Krabbenhoft,et al.  Numerical simulation of a flow-like landslide using the particle finite element method , 2015 .

[40]  Joseph John Monaghan,et al.  SPH modelling of water waves generated by submarine landslides , 2010 .

[41]  M. Randolph,et al.  A practical numerical approach for large deformation problems in soil , 1998 .

[42]  E. Pelinovsky,et al.  Tsunami waves generated by submarine landslides of variable volume: analytical solutions for a basin of variable depth , 2010 .

[43]  Hiroshi Yamashita,et al.  A primal–dual interior point method for nonlinear optimization over second-order cones , 2009, Optim. Methods Softw..

[44]  Andrei V. Lyamin,et al.  Computational Cam clay plasticity using second-order cone programming , 2012 .

[45]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Smoothed Particle Finite-Element Method for Large-Deformation Problems in Geomechanics , 2018, International Journal of Geomechanics.

[46]  R. Huilgol Variational inequalities in the flows of yield stress fluids including inertia: Theory and applications , 2002 .

[47]  Francesco Ferri,et al.  A basal slip model for Lagrangian finite element simulations of 3D landslides , 2017 .

[48]  K. Soga,et al.  Numerical modelling of submarine landslides with sensitive clay layers , 2016 .

[49]  Kristian Krabbenhoft,et al.  Particle finite element analysis of the granular column collapse problem , 2014 .

[50]  Dong Wang,et al.  Particle finite element analysis of large deformation and granular flow problems , 2013 .

[51]  Philippe Coussot,et al.  Efficient numerical computations of yield stress fluid flows using second-order cone programming , 2015 .

[52]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  Unified Lagrangian formulation for solid and fluid mechanics and FSI problems , 2016 .

[53]  Alessio Piatanesi,et al.  Numerical modelling of tsunami generation and propagation from submarine slumps: the 1998 Papua New Guinea event , 2001 .

[54]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Lagrangian modelling of large deformation induced by progressive failure of sensitive clays with elastoviscoplasticity , 2017 .

[55]  J. Bleyer Advances in the simulation of viscoplastic fluid flows using interior-point methods , 2018 .

[56]  Massimiliano Cremonesi,et al.  A Lagrangian finite element approach for the analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[57]  C. Mariotti,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Submarine Landslides and Their Hydraulic Effects , 1997 .

[58]  A. Makrodimopoulos,et al.  Remarks on some properties of conic yield restrictions in limit analysis , 2010 .

[59]  Joris Degroote,et al.  Partitioned Simulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2013 .

[60]  Kristian Krabbenhoft,et al.  A contact dynamics approach to the Granular Element Method , 2014 .

[61]  E. Oñate,et al.  A monolithic Lagrangian approach for fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[62]  Andreas Wächter,et al.  A Primal-Dual Interior-Point Method for Nonlinear Programming with Strong Global and Local Convergence Properties , 2003, SIAM J. Optim..

[63]  Andrei V. Lyamin,et al.  Granular contact dynamics with particle elasticity , 2012, Granular Matter.

[64]  U. Perego,et al.  Simulation of the flow of fresh cement suspensions by a Lagrangian finite element approach , 2010 .

[65]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Improved fractional step method for simulating fluid‐structure interaction using the PFEM , 2014 .

[66]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1994, ACM Trans. Graph..