Limitations of recreational camera traps for wildlife management and conservation research: A practitioner’s perspective

The availability of affordable ‘recreational’ camera traps has dramatically increased over the last decade. We present survey results which show that many conservation practitioners use cheaper ‘recreational’ units for research rather than more expensive ‘professional’ equipment. We present our perspective of using two popular models of ‘recreational’ camera trap for ecological field-based studies. The models used (for >2 years) presented us with a range of practical problems at all stages of their use including deployment, operation, and data management, which collectively crippled data collection and limited opportunities for quantification of key issues arising. Our experiences demonstrate that prospective users need to have a sufficient understanding of the limitations camera trap technology poses, dimensions we communicate here. While the merits of different camera traps will be study specific, the performance of more expensive ‘professional’ models may prove more cost-effective in the long-term when using camera traps for research.

[1]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  REVIEW: Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes , 2015 .

[2]  René van der Wal,et al.  Microscope and spectacle: On the complexities of using new visual technologies to communicate about wildlife conservation , 2015, Ambio.

[3]  Richard Shine,et al.  It’s a dog-eat-croc world: dingo predation on the nests of freshwater crocodiles in tropical Australia , 2011, Ecological Research.

[4]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  User-based design specifications for the ultimate camera trap for wildlife research , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[5]  Laszlo Nagy,et al.  Why most conservation monitoring is, but need not be, a waste of time. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[6]  Paul D. Meek,et al.  "Which camera trap type and how many do I need?" A review of camera features and study designs for a range of wildlife research applications , 2013 .

[7]  Siva R. Sundaresan,et al.  Management and Analysis of Camera Trap Data: Alternative Approaches (Response to Harris et al. 2010) , 2011 .

[8]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Science, Conservation, and Camera Traps , 2011 .

[9]  Grant Harris,et al.  Automatic Storage and Analysis of Camera Trap Data , 2010 .

[10]  A. F. O'connell,et al.  Camera Traps in Animal Ecology , 2011 .

[11]  C. Carbone,et al.  Surveys using camera traps: are we looking to a brighter future? , 2008 .

[12]  Jamie McCallum,et al.  Changing use of camera traps in mammalian field research: habitats, taxa and study types , 2013 .

[13]  Karl Vernes,et al.  The history of wildlife camera trapping as a survey tool in Australia , 2015 .

[14]  R. Justin Irvine,et al.  Carcass Provisioning to Support Scavengers: Evaluating a Controversial Nature Conservation Practice , 2013, AMBIO.

[15]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[16]  E. Ritchie.  Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores , 2009 .

[17]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Spatially explicit inference for open populations: estimating demographic parameters from camera-trap studies. , 2010, Ecology.

[18]  L. Silveira,et al.  Camera trap, line transect census and track surveys: a comparative evaluation , 2003 .

[19]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[20]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[21]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Noninvasive Survey Methods for Carnivores , 2010 .

[22]  M. Heurich,et al.  Evaluation of six digital camera models for the use in capture-recapture sampling of Eurasian Lynx (Lynx lynx) , 2013 .

[23]  D. Hughson,et al.  COMPARISON OF MOTION-ACTIVATED CAMERAS FOR WILDLIFE INVESTIGATIONS , 2012 .

[24]  Kae Kawanishi,et al.  Evaluating Types and Features of Camera Traps in Ecological Studies: A Guide for Researchers , 2011 .

[25]  John-André Henden,et al.  Towards good practice guidance in using camera‐traps in ecology: influence of sampling design on validity of ecological inferences , 2013 .

[26]  Timothy G. O'Brien,et al.  The Wildlife Picture Index: monitoring top trophic levels , 2010 .