Response of the invasive pompom weed, Campuloclinium macrocephalum (Asteraceae), to feeding by the foliage-deforming thrips Liothrips tractabilis (Phlaeothripidae) under outdoor conditions in South Africa

ABSTRACT The foliage-deforming thrips Liothrips tractabilis Mound and Pereyra (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) was recently released in South Africa as the first classical biological control agent against the invasive South American herb, Campuloclinium macrocephalum (Less.) DC. (Asteraceae). The impact of the thrips on young plants and regrowth of C. macrocephalum was assessed under outdoor conditions, and the results were compared to those of earlier laboratory trials that were conducted while the agent was still under investigation in quarantine. The outdoor trials revealed that feeding by L. tractabilis reduced the growth and biomass accumulation of C. macrocephalum, particularly in young plants and to a lesser extent in regrowth, which was largely consistent with the results of the earlier laboratory trials. Thrips-infested young plants were significantly shorter, produced fewer leaves and displayed significantly lower wet root masses and lower below- and above-ground dry masses, compared to the control plants. Although thrips-infested regrowth were significantly shorter, produced fewer leaves and displayed significantly lower above-ground dry masses than the control plants, the differences in wet root masses and below-ground dry masses were not significant. Although laboratory-based impact assessments are not necessarily an accurate reflection of field impact, in this instance the results were largely validated by the outdoor assessments. The results suggest that L. tractabilis will have a negative impact on C. macrocephalum populations in the field and thus contribute towards the weed’s biological control. The establishment of L. tractabilis has recently been confirmed in South Africa, providing the opportunity to verify these predictions.

[1]  F. Mckay,et al.  Host range and impact of the stem- and leaf-deforming thrips, Liothrips tractabilis: a biological control agent for Campuloclinium macrocephalum, in South Africa , 2015, BioControl.

[2]  T. Olckers,et al.  Response of the Invasive Cat's Claw Creeper, Macfadyena unguis-cati (Bignoniaceae), to Simulated and Actual Defoliation by Charidotis auroguttata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) , 2012 .

[3]  L. Henderson,et al.  The Initiation of a Biological Control Programme Against Pompom Weed, Campuloclinium macrocephalum (Less.) DC. (Asteraceae), in South Africa , 2011 .

[4]  M. Robertson,et al.  Ecological niche modelling of an invasive alien plant and its potential biological control agents , 2011 .

[5]  Y. Buckley,et al.  Review of approaches to evaluate the effectiveness of weed biological control agents , 2009 .

[6]  A. Boughton,et al.  Efforts to establish a foliage-feeding moth, Austromusotima camptozonale, against Lygodium microphyllum in Florida, considered in the light of a retrospective review of establishment success of weed biocontrol agents belonging to different arthropod taxa , 2008 .

[7]  J. Kiniry,et al.  Defoliation by introduced Diorhabda elongata leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) reduces carbohydrate reserves and regrowth of Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) , 2007 .

[8]  S. Raghu,et al.  A scientific approach to agent selection , 2006 .

[9]  A. S. McClay,et al.  The role of pre-release efficacy assessment in selecting classical biological control agents for weeds—applying the Anna Karenina principle , 2005 .

[10]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Impact of foliage feeding by Zygina sp. on tuber biomass and reproduction of Asparagus asparagoides (L.): relevance to biological control in Australia. , 2004 .

[11]  A. J. C. Malloch,et al.  The effects of chrysomelid beetle grazing and plant competition on the growth of Rumex obtusifolius , 1986, Oecologia.

[12]  M. Senna,et al.  Targeting emerging weeds for biological control in South Africa: the benefits of halting the spread of alien plants at an early stage of their invasion , 2004 .

[13]  T. Olckers Targeting emerging weeds for biological control in South Africa : the benefits of halting the spread of alien plants at an early stage of their invasion : working for water , 2004 .

[14]  H. S. Jacob,et al.  Prioritising agents based on predicted efficacy: beyond the lottery approach. , 2003 .

[15]  H. S. Jacob,et al.  Improving the selection, testing and evaluation of weed biological control agents , 2002 .

[16]  K. Dhileepan,et al.  Response of the weed Parthenium hysterophorus (Asteraceae) to defoliation by the introduced biocontrol agent Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). , 2000 .

[17]  G. Meyer Effects of insect feeding on growth and fitness of goldenrod (Solidago altissima). , 2000 .

[18]  H. Evans,et al.  Can failure be turned into success for biological control of mile-a-minute weed (Mikania micrantha)? , 2000 .

[19]  M. Webb Biological Control of Weeds. A World Catalogue of Agents and their Target Weeds. , 1999 .

[20]  M. Julien,et al.  Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds , 1992 .

[21]  N. Reimer Predation on Liothrips urichi Karny (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae): A Case of Biotic Interference , 1988 .