Out-Beale-Ing Beale
暂无分享,去创建一个
In response to the 1991 Supreme Court decision resuscitating the presumption against extraterritoriality [hereinafter “PAE” or “presumption”], EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co. (Aramco), Larry Kramer described the presumption as an anachronism—a throwback to the strict territorialist approach to choice of law that prevailed before the mid-Twentieth Century but has been mostly abandoned since then. The title of his scathing article, Vestiges of Beale, referred to Joseph Beale, the Harvard Law professor and reporter of the First Restatement of Conflict of Laws, whose since-discredited theories underlay that Restatement’s approach to choice of law. In the cases since Aramco, the Court has strengthened and expanded the presumption. With its decision in RJR Nabisco v. European Community, it is fair to say, the Court has out-Beale’d Beale.
[1] P. Stephan. Private Litigation as a Foreign Relations Problem , 2016, AJIL Unbound.
[2] Anthony J. Colangelo. The Frankenstein’s Monster of Extraterritoriality Law , 2016, AJIL Unbound.
[3] William S. Dodge. The Presumption Against Extraterritoriality in Two Steps , 2016, AJIL Unbound.
[4] Hannah L. Buxbaum. The Scope and Limitations of the Presumption against Extraterritoriality , 2016, AJIL Unbound.