Resolution analysis of shallow marine seismic data acquired using an airgun and an 8-channel streamer cable

Abstract We conducted a high-resolution seismic survey off Yeosu, Korea, using a 30 in3 small airgun as a seismic source and an 8-channel streamer cable with a 5 m group interval as a receiver, to find out the proper acquisition and processing parameters at the study area where shallow sedimentary layers were well deposited. The data were digitally recorded with a shot interval of 2 s and a sample interval of 0.1 ms using an in-house PC-based acquisition and processing system. The quality of the subsurface image depends on the acquisition parameters such as the sample interval, common midpoint (CMP) interval and CMP fold. To understand the effects of these parameters, we resampled the field data with various sample intervals, CMP intervals and CMP folds and processed the data. The analysis results show that thin layers of 70–80 cm thickness at a depth of 30–45 m from the sea bottom can be imaged with good resolution and continuity using acquisition parameters with a sample interval of less than 0.2 ms, a CMP interval of shorter than 2.5 m and a CMP fold of greater than 4. The data quality of the shallow marine seismic survey is greatly enhanced through multichannel data processing flows such as spiking deconvolution, frequency filtering and careful static correction. Our results demonstrate that very high-resolution seismic reflection images can be made from 8-channel data recoded with high sample rates and processed with appropriate parameters.

[1]  Tine Missiaen,et al.  VHR Marine 3D Seismics for Shallow Water Investigations: Some Practical Guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  Timothy G. Leighton,et al.  Three dimensional high-resolution acoustic imaging of the sub-seabed , 2008 .

[3]  A. Pugin,et al.  High-resolution seismic imaging of outcrop-scale channels and an incised-valley system within the fluvial-dominated Lower Freshwater Molasse (Aquitanian, western Swiss Molasse Basin) , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas Bohlen,et al.  Towards high‐resolution 3D marine seismic surveying using Boomer sources , 2002 .

[5]  Ho-Young Lee,et al.  PC-based acquisition and processing of high-resolution marine seismic data , 1996 .

[6]  Joseph I. Boyce,et al.  Ultra-high-resolution marine 2D–3D seismic investigation of the Liman Tepe/Karantina Island archaeological site (Urla/Turkey) , 2009 .

[7]  M. Scheidhauer,et al.  Development of a System for 3D High-resolution Seismic Reflection Profiling on Lakes , 2005 .

[8]  Don W. Steeples,et al.  High-resolution common-depth-point reflection profiling: Field acquisition parameter design , 1986 .

[9]  A. Pugin,et al.  HIGH-RESOLUTION, MULTICHANNEL, MARINE SEISMIC SURVEYING USING A SMALL AIRGUN SOURCE , 1999 .

[10]  P. Cochonat,et al.  Analysis of Holocene sedimentary features on the Adriatic shelf from 3D very high resolution seismic data (Triad survey) , 2004 .

[11]  Justin K. Dix,et al.  Decimeter-resolution 3D seismic volume in shallow water: A case study in small-object detection , 2008 .

[12]  S. P. Berné,et al.  A new system for acquisition and processing of very high‐resolution seismic reflection data , 1990 .

[13]  J. Austin,et al.  HIGH-RESOLUTION 3D SEISMIC REFLECTION AND CORING TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO LATE QUATERNARY DEPOSITS ON THE NEW JERSEY SHELF , 1997 .

[14]  De Roeck,et al.  Very high resolution 3D marine seismic data processing for geotechnical applications , 1998 .

[15]  Peter G. Simpkin,et al.  Environmental Marine Geoscience 1. Status and Trends of Marine High-Resolution Seismic Reflection Profiling: Data Acquistion , 1999 .

[16]  C. Müller The Marine VHR 2.5-D Seismic Brute Stack Cube as a Feasible Tool for Low Budget Investigation and Research , 2005 .