Bayesian sequential auctions

In many natural settings agents participate in multiple different auctions that are not simultaneous. In such auctions, future opportunities affect strategic considerations of the players. The goal of this paper is to develop a quantitative understanding of outcomes of such sequential auctions. In earlier work (Paes Leme et al. 2012) we initiated the study of the price of anarchy in sequential auctions. We considered sequential first price auctions in the full information model, where players are aware of all future opportunities, as well as the valuation of all players. In this paper, we study efficiency in sequential auctions in the Bayesian environment, relaxing the informational assumption on the players. We focus on two environments, both studied in the full information model in Paes Leme et al. 2012, matching markets and matroid auctions. In the full information environment, a sequential first price cut auction for matroid settings is efficient. In Bayesian environments this is no longer the case, as we show using a simple example with three players. Our main result is a bound of 3 on the price of anarchy in both matroid auctions and matching markets. To bound the price of anarchy we need to consider possible deviations at an equilibrium. In a sequential Bayesian environment the effect of deviations is more complex than in one-shot games; early bids allow others to infer information about the player's value. We create effective deviations despite the presence of this difficulty by introducing a bluffing technique of independent interest.

[1]  R. Weber Multiple-Object Auctions , 1981 .

[2]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[3]  O. Ashenfelter How Auctions Work for Wine and Art , 1989 .

[4]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  Game theory (3. pr.) , 1991 .

[5]  Daniel R. Vincent,et al.  The Declining Price Anomaly , 1993 .

[6]  E. Maskin,et al.  Equilibrium in Sealed High Bid Auctions , 2000 .

[7]  Ian L. Gale,et al.  Sequential Auctions of Endogenously Valued Objects , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[8]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  First-price path auctions , 2005, EC '05.

[9]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[10]  D. Parkes Algorithmic Game Theory: Online Mechanisms , 2007 .

[11]  E. Maskin Asymmetric Auctions , 2007 .

[12]  Michael L. Honig,et al.  On the efficiency of sequential auctions for spectrum sharing , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Game Theory for Networks.

[13]  René Kirkegaard,et al.  Asymmetric first price auctions , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  G. Rodriguez Sequential Auctions with Multi-Unit Demands , 2009 .

[15]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Simple versus optimal mechanisms , 2009, EC '09.

[16]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.

[17]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  GSP auctions with correlated types , 2011, EC '11.

[18]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Welfare guarantees for combinatorial auctions with item bidding , 2011, SODA '11.

[19]  Haim Kaplan,et al.  Non-price equilibria in markets of discrete goods , 2011, EC '11.

[20]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  On the efficiency of equilibria in generalized second price auctions , 2011, EC '11.

[21]  Sven de Vries,et al.  An Ascending Vickrey Auction for Selling Bases of a Matroid , 2011, Oper. Res..

[22]  P. Reny Sequential Equilibria of Multi-Stage Games with Infinite Sets of Types and Actions , 2011 .

[23]  René Kirkegaard Ranking Asymmetric Auctions using the Dispersive Order , 2011 .

[24]  Renato Paes Leme,et al.  Sequential auctions and externalities , 2011, SODA.