An Advocacy Coalition Framework Approach to Stakeholder Analysis: Understanding the Political Context of California Marine Protected Area Policy

There is a growing recognition that public policy controversies are driven more by value differences than by technical deficiencies. Unfortunately, we have yet to develop, test, and refine systematic approaches for understanding political systems. In this article I explain how the advocacy coalition framework (ACF) can be used as a theoretical basis for understanding political context via a stakeholder analysis. An ACF stakeholder analysis widens the attention of policy analysts toward subsystem-wide dynamics with multiple actors who are motivated by their beliefs, structure their relationships into advocacy coalitions, and try to influence policy through utilizing multiple resources and venues. I illustrate an ACF approach to stakeholder analysis in a scientifically contentious political conflict over the establishment of marine protected areas in California. I conclude with a summary of contributions to the ACF literature and the strengths and limitations of conducting an ACF stakeholder analysis.

[1]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Knowledge: Advocacy Organizations , 2001 .

[2]  G. Sewell.  Actors, coalitions and the framework convention on climate change , 2005 .

[3]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Advocacy Coalitions, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Policy Change , 1996 .

[4]  Igor H.Ansoff.  Strategic Management , 1979 .

[5]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  The Comparative Study of Political Elites , 1976 .

[6]  M. Reich,et al.  Political analysis of health reform in the Dominican Republic. , 1999, Health policy and planning.

[7]  R. Hinde,et al.  The Possibility of Cooperation@@@Cooperation: The Basis of Sociability.@@@Cooperation and Prosocial Behavior.@@@Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. , 1990 .

[8]  I. William Zartman,et al.  Conflict and Resolution: Contest, Cost, and Change , 1991 .

[9]  Beryl A. Radin,et al.  Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age , 2000 .

[10]  Paul J. Quirk,et al.  Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[11]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Ted Nordhaus,et al.  The Death of Environmentalism Global warming politics in a post-environmental world , 2005 .

[13]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[14]  A. Vining,et al.  Policy analysis : concepts and practice , 1989 .

[15]  Marc Mangel,et al.  No‐take Reserve Networks: Sustaining Fishery Populations and Marine Ecosystems , 1999 .

[16]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[17]  Steven D. Gaines,et al.  PLUGGING A HOLE IN THE OCEAN: THE EMERGING SCIENCE OF MARINE RESERVES1 , 2003 .

[18]  E. Laumann,et al.  Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[19]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  A primer for policy analysis , 1978 .

[20]  C. Painter.  MAKING PUBLIC POLICY , 2006 .

[21]  Patton Sawicki Clark,et al.  Basic methods of policy analysis and planning , 1986 .

[22]  R. Gregory,et al.  Bringing stakeholder values into environmental policy choices: a community-based estuary case study , 2001 .

[23]  Benjamin L. Crosby,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis: A Vital Tool for Strategic Managers , 1993 .

[24]  A. J. Meltsner,et al.  Political Feasibility and Policy Analysis , 1972 .

[25]  M. Peffley,et al.  How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[26]  Edella Schlager,et al.  Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework , 1995 .

[27]  M. Lindenberg,et al.  Managing Development: The Political Dimension , 1981 .

[28]  John T. Scholz,et al.  Duty, Fear, and Tax Compliance: The Heuristic Basis of Citizenship Behavior , 1995 .

[29]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[30]  D. Buckles.  Cultivating Peace: Conflict and Collaboration in Natural Resource Management , 1999 .

[31]  C. Weible,et al.  A Comparison of a Collaborative and Top‐Down Approach to the Use of Science in Policy: Establishing Marine Protected Areas in California , 2004 .

[32]  Peter J. May,et al.  Politics and Policy Analysis , 1986 .

[33]  W. Neil Adger,et al.  Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management , 2001 .

[34]  Y. Dror.  Policy Analysts: A New Professional Role in Government Service , 1967 .

[35]  Christopher M. Weible,et al.  Beliefs and Perceived Influence in a Natural Resource Conflict: An Advocacy Coalition Approach to Policy Networks , 2005 .

[36]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Short‐Term Versus Long‐Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989 , 2004 .

[37]  Robin Grimble,et al.  Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities , 1997 .

[38]  Lawrence Susskind,et al.  Conducting a Conflict Assessment , 1999 .

[39]  P. May.  Policy Learning and Failure , 1992, Journal of Public Policy.

[40]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents , 1987 .

[41]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[42]  R. Ramírez.  Stakeholder analysis and conflict management. , 1999 .

[43]  Evan Vlachos,et al.  The dynamics of technical controversy , 1981 .

[44]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California , 2005 .

[45]  Colin J. Bennett,et al.  The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change , 1992 .

[46]  J. Folk-Williams.  Managing Public Disputes , 1990 .

[47]  R. Brugha,et al.  Stakeholder analysis: a review. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[48]  Daniel J. Fiorino.  Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms , 1990 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contrasting Rational and Psychological Analyses of Political Choice , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[50]  Eugene Bardach,et al.  A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis , 2000 .

[51]  P. Sabatier.  Theories of the Policy Process , 1999 .

[52]  P. Sabatier.  Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning, and Policy Change , 1987 .

[53]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems , 1998 .

[54]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Incorporating Multiple Actors and Guidance Instruments into Models of Regulatory Policymaking , 1987 .