A Review on Application of Soft Computing Techniques for the Rapid Visual Safety Evaluation and Damage Classification of Existing Buildings

Abstract Seismic vulnerability assessment of existing buildings is of great concern around the world. Different countries develop various approaches and methodologies to overcome the disastrous effects of earthquakes on the structural parameters of the building and the human losses. There are structures still in service with a high seismic vulnerability, which proposes an urgent need for a screening system’s damageability grading system. Rapid urbanization and the proliferation of slums give rise to improper construction practices that make the building stock’s reliability ambiguous, including old structures that were constructed either when the seismic codes were not advanced or not enforced by law. Despite having a good knowledge of structural analysis, it is impractical to conduct detailed nonlinear analysis on each building in the target area to define their seismic vulnerability. This indicates the necessity of developing a rapid, reliable, and computationally easy method of seismic vulnerability assessment, more commonly known as Rapid Visual Screening (RVS). This method begins with a walk-down survey by a trained evaluator, and an initial score is assigned to the structure. Further, the vulnerability parameters are defined (predictor variables), and the damage grades are defined. Various methods are then adopted to develop an optimum correlation between the parameters and damage grades. Soft computing techniques including probabilistic approaches, meta-heuristics, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) theories such as artificial neural networks, machine learning, fuzzy logic, etc. due to their capabilities in targeting inherent imprecision of phenomena in real-world are among the most important and widely used approaches in this regard.

[1]  S. Roeslin,et al.  A machine learning damage prediction model for the 2017 Puebla-Morelos, Mexico, earthquake , 2020 .

[2]  C. Casapulla,et al.  Seismic safety assessment of a masonry building according to Italian Guidelines on Cultural Heritage: simplified mechanical-based approach and pushover analysis , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[3]  Mahmut Bilgehan,et al.  Support vector machines in structural engineering: a review , 2015 .

[4]  Hadi Salehi,et al.  Emerging artificial intelligence methods in structural engineering , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[5]  Murat Ceylan,et al.  AN ANN APPROACHES ON ESTIMATING EARTHQUAKE PERFORMANCES OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS , 2012 .

[6]  Ioannis Andreadis,et al.  Classification of Seismic Damages in Buildings Using Fuzzy Logic Procedures , 2013 .

[7]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Mehmet Inel,et al.  Seismic risk assessment of buildings in urban areas: a case study for Denizli, Turkey , 2008 .

[9]  Mauricio Sa´nchez‐Silva,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Fuzzy Logic and Neural Networks , 2001 .

[10]  T. P. Tassios,et al.  Design in shear of reinforced concrete short columns , 2013 .

[11]  Carmine Lima,et al.  Soft computing techniques in structural and earthquake engineering: a literature review , 2020 .

[12]  Harriette Stone Exposure and vulnerability for seismic risk evaluations , 2018 .

[13]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Practical neural network recipes in C , 1993 .

[14]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  Application of Support Vector Machine Modeling for the Rapid Seismic Hazard Safety Evaluation of Existing Buildings , 2020, Energies.

[15]  Radhikesh P. Nanda,et al.  Rapid visual screening procedure of existing building based on statistical analysis , 2018, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[16]  Musa Resheidat,et al.  Rapid assessment for seismic vulnerability of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings , 2015, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[17]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  Earthquake Hazard Safety Assessment of Buildings via Smartphone App: A Comparative Study , 2019 .

[18]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design , 2016 .

[19]  Luigi Sorrentino,et al.  Principal component analysis for a seismic usability model of unreinforced masonry buildings , 2017 .

[20]  GUNEY OZCEBE*,et al.  STATISTICAL SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS IN TURKEY ON A REGIONAL SCALE , 2004 .

[21]  Akkachai Ketsap,et al.  Uncertainty and Fuzzy Decisions in Earthquake Risk Evaluation of Buildings , 2019, Engineering Journal.

[22]  M. Mishra Machine learning techniques for structural health monitoring of heritage buildings: A state-of-the-art review and case studies , 2020, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[23]  Ali Akbar Ramezanianpour,et al.  Evolutionary Fuzzy Function with Support Vector Regression for the Prediction of Concrete Compressive Strength , 2011, 2011 UKSim 5th European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation.

[24]  HAYRI BAYTAN OZMEN,et al.  Evaluation of the main parameters affecting seismic performance of the RC buildings , 2014 .

[25]  Zekâi Sen,et al.  Supervised fuzzy logic modeling for building earthquake hazard assessment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Bartolomeo Pantò,et al.  Multi-Directional Seismic Assessment of Historical Masonry Buildings by Means of Macro-Element Modelling: Application to a Building Damaged during the L’Aquila Earthquake (Italy) , 2017 .

[27]  Min-Yuan Cheng,et al.  Seismic assessment of school buildings in Taiwan using the evolutionary support vector machine inference system , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[28]  Stephanos E. Dritsos,et al.  First-Level Pre-earthquake Assessment of Buildings Using Fuzzy Logic , 2006 .

[29]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  Improved Rapid Visual Earthquake Hazard Safety Evaluation of Existing Buildings Using a Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Model , 2020 .

[30]  M. Dolšek Simplified method for seismic risk assessment of buildings with consideration of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty , 2011 .

[31]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  Introductory overview: Optimization using evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics , 2019, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  Zhao Huamin Prediction for high volume fly ash concrete strength based on LS-SVM , 2013 .

[33]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  The Effect of Site-Specific Design Spectrum on Earthquake-Building Parameters: A Case Study from the Marmara Region (NW Turkey) , 2020, Applied Sciences.

[34]  Jamshid Ghaboussi Soft Computing in Engineering , 2018 .

[35]  G. Ghodrati Amiri,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria for developing a risk management system in seismically prone areas , 2014 .

[36]  Alejandro Betancourt,et al.  Automatic detection of building typology using deep learning methods on street level images , 2020 .

[37]  Radhikesh P. Nanda,et al.  Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of building stocks for developing countries , 2014 .

[38]  M. Hakan Arslan,et al.  An evaluation of effective design parameters on earthquake performance of RC buildings using neural networks , 2010 .

[39]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Approaches to the rapid seismic damage prediction of r/c buildings using artificial neural networks , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[40]  Qie Sun,et al.  Prediction of short-term output of photovoltaic system based on generalized regression neural network , 2017, 2017 IEEE Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2).

[41]  Ahmet Yakut,et al.  A Screening Procedure for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks , 2007 .

[42]  A. Yakut,et al.  Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey , 2003 .

[43]  Azlan Adnan,et al.  Artificial Neural Network Application for Predicting Seismic Damage Index of Buildings in Malaysia , 2012, Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering.

[44]  Zekâi Sen Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[45]  T. Lahmer,et al.  Improved Rapid Visual Earthquake Hazard Safety Evaluation of Existing Buildings Using Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Model , 2020 .

[46]  H. Burton,et al.  A machine learning framework for assessing post-earthquake structural safety , 2018 .

[47]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  Seismic parameters' combinations for the optimum prediction of the damage state of R/C buildings using neural networks , 2017, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[48]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[49]  Jafar Sobhani,et al.  Support vector machine for prediction of the compressive strength of no-slump concrete , 2013 .

[50]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[51]  Onur Kaplan,et al.  A rapid seismic safety assessment method for mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[52]  Chuntian Cheng,et al.  Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction , 2006 .

[53]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Prediction of seismic-induced structural damage using artificial neural networks , 2009 .

[54]  Hartono,et al.  Three-Stage Fuzzy Rule-Based Model for Earthquake Non-Engineered Building House Damage Hazard Determination , 2017, J. Adv. Comput. Intell. Intell. Informatics.

[55]  Gwo-Fong Lin,et al.  Typhoon flood forecasting using integrated two-stage Support Vector Machine approach , 2013 .

[56]  V. V. Srinivas,et al.  Downscaling of precipitation for climate change scenarios: A support vector machine approach , 2006 .

[57]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[58]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  ML-EHSAPP: a prototype for machine learning-based earthquake hazard safety assessment of structures by using a smartphone app , 2021, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering.

[59]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Robust Sparse Logistic Regression With the $L_{q}$ ( $0 < \text{q} < 1$ ) Regularization for Feature Selection Using Gene Expression Data , 2018, IEEE Access.

[60]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Rule Base Modeling , 2010 .

[61]  R. R. Aliev,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks , 2001 .

[62]  Eyyüp Gülbandilar,et al.  Investigation of the Relationships and Effects of Urban Transformation Parameters for Risky Structures: A Rapid Assessment Model , 2019, IEEE Access.

[63]  Timothy Masters,et al.  Probabilistic Neural Networks , 1993 .

[64]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Deep learning in neural networks: An overview , 2014, Neural Networks.

[65]  Serena Cattari,et al.  On the seismic response of buildings in aggregate: Analysis of a typical masonry building from Azores , 2017 .

[66]  Ercan Işık,et al.  Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings , 2016 .

[67]  Mehul Shah,et al.  A Proposed Rapid Visual Screening Procedure for Seismic Evaluation of RC-Frame Buildings in India , 2010 .

[68]  Solomon Tesfamariam,et al.  Risk-Based Seismic Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2008 .

[69]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  Earthquake Hazard Safety Assessment of Existing Buildings Using Optimized Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network , 2020, Energies.

[70]  Mohammadreza Yadollahi,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Functional Method for Rapid Visual Screening of Existing Buildings , 2012 .

[71]  Aysegul Askan,et al.  Probabilistic methods for the estimation of potential seismic damage: Application to reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey , 2010 .

[72]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[73]  L. Tham,et al.  Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China , 2008 .

[74]  Devrim Özhendekci,et al.  Rapid Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low- to Mid-Rise Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using Bingöl's Regional Data , 2012 .

[75]  Snehashish Chakraverty,et al.  Concepts of Soft Computing: Fuzzy and ANN with Programming , 2019 .

[76]  A. Agresti An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .

[77]  Abbas Mardani,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 , 2015 .

[78]  Ehsan Harirchian,et al.  Developing a hierarchical type-2 fuzzy logic model to improve rapid evaluation of earthquake hazard safety of existing buildings , 2020 .

[79]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Uncertainty about the uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis , 2003 .

[80]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[81]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[82]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[83]  Dongrui Wu,et al.  Recommendations on Designing Practical Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Systems , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[84]  Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko,et al.  Seismic vulnerability of old confined masonry buildings in Osijek, Croatia , 2016 .

[85]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[86]  Kamal Ahmed,et al.  Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management , 2014 .

[87]  S. S. Tezcan,et al.  A NEW APPROACH FOR THE PRELIMINARY SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF RC BUILDINGS: P25 SCORING METHOD , 2008 .

[88]  Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko,et al.  Rapid seismic risk assessment , 2017 .

[89]  Henry V. Burton,et al.  Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review , 2021 .

[90]  N. F. Pan,et al.  Selecting an appropriate excavation construction method based on qualitative assessments , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[91]  Jieh-Haur Chen,et al.  Development of a Data-Mining Technique for Regional-Scale Evaluation of Building Seismic Vulnerability , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[92]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Advances in kernel methods: support vector learning , 1999 .

[93]  Jerry M. Mendel,et al.  Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple , 2002, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[94]  Konstantinos Morfidis,et al.  USE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS IN THE R/C BUILDINGS’ SEISMIC VULNERABILTY ASSESSMENT: THE PRACTICAL POINT OF VIEW , 2019, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2015).

[95]  H. Loáiciga,et al.  Application of non-animal–inspired evolutionary algorithms to reservoir operation: an overview , 2019, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[96]  Alper Aldemir,et al.  Rapid screening method for the determination of seismic vulnerability assessment of RC building stocks , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[97]  Henry V. Burton,et al.  Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning , 2020 .

[98]  B. Pantò,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability of Historical Masonry Aggregate Buildings in Oriental Sicily , 2018, International Journal of Architectural Heritage.

[99]  Cesar B Vallejo Rapid Visual Screening of Buildings in the City of Manila, Philippines , 2010 .