Experimental simulation of simultaneous vision.

PURPOSE To present and validate a prototype of an optical instrument that allows experimental simulation of pure bifocal vision. To evaluate the influence of different power additions on image contrast and visual acuity. METHODS The instrument provides the eye with two superimposed images, aligned and with the same magnification, but with different defocus states. Subjects looking through the instrument are able to experience pure simultaneous vision, with adjustable refractive correction and addition power. The instrument is used to investigate the impact of the amount of addition of an ideal bifocal simultaneous vision correction, both on image contrast and on visual performance. the instrument is validated through computer simulations of the letter contrast and by equivalent optical experiments with an artificial eye (camera). Visual acuity (VA) was measured in four subjects (AGE: 34.3 ± 3.4 years; spherical error: -2.1 ± 2.7 diopters [D]) for low and high contrast letters and different amounts of addition. RESULTS The largest degradation in contrast and visual acuity (∼25%) occurred for additions around ±2 D, while additions of ±4 D produced lower degradation (14%). Low additions (1-2 D) result in lower VA than high additions (3-4 D). CONCLUSIONS A simultaneous vision instrument is an excellent tool to simulate bifocal vision and to gain understanding of multifocal solutions for presbyopia. Simultaneous vision induces a pattern of visual performance degradation, which is well predicted by the degradation found in image quality. Neural effects, claimed to be crucial in the patients' tolerance of simultaneous vision, can be therefore compared with pure optical effects.

[1]  J. Goodman Introduction to Fourier optics , 1969 .

[2]  Robert B. Mandell,et al.  Contact Lens Practice , 2002 .

[3]  I. Cox,et al.  The effect of add power on simultaneous vision, monocentric, bifocal, soft lens visual performance , 1993 .

[4]  J E Sheedy,et al.  Does the presbyopic visual system adapt to contact lenses? , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[5]  A Bradley,et al.  Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses. , 1993, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  W Williamson,et al.  Compared optical performances of multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (contrast sensitivity and dynamic visual acuity) , 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[7]  Lyndon Jones,et al.  Reactive or proactive contact lens fitting — does it make a difference? , 1996 .

[8]  G. Love,et al.  Wave-front correction and production of Zernike modes with a liquid-crystal spatial light modulator. , 1997, Applied Optics.

[9]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[10]  N. Château,et al.  Simulated in Situ Optical Performance of Bifocal Contact Lenses , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[11]  Vinita Allee Henry,et al.  Clinical Manual of Contact Lenses , 1999 .

[12]  A. Weiner Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators , 2000 .

[13]  David Williams,et al.  Visual performance after correcting the monochromatic and chromatic aberrations of the eye. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[14]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Predicting and Assessing Visual Performance with Multizone Bifocal Contact Lenses , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Adaptive optics with a programmable phase modulator: applications in the human eye. , 2004, Optics express.

[16]  Steven C Schallhorn,et al.  Comparison of tropicamide and cyclopentolate for cycloplegic refractions in myopic adult refractive surgery patients , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[17]  A Márquez,et al.  Programmable apodizer to compensate chromatic aberration effects using a liquid crystal spatial light modulator. , 2005, Optics express.

[18]  Angelika Unterhuber,et al.  Adaptive optics with a magnetic deformable mirror: applications in the human eye. , 2006, Optics express.

[19]  Bruce J W Evans,et al.  Monovision: a review , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  J. Alfonso,et al.  Prospective study of the Acri.LISA bifocal intraocular lens , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Influence of adaptive-optics ocular aberration correction on visual acuity at different luminances and contrast polarities. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[22]  S. Pepin,et al.  Neuroadaptation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses , 2008, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[23]  E. Bennett Contact lens correction of presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[24]  E. Sanders,et al.  Visual Acuity and “Balanced Progressive” Simultaneous Vision Multifocal Contact Lenses , 2008, Eye & contact lens.

[25]  Navneet Gupta,et al.  Visual Comparison of Multifocal Contact Lens to Monovision , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[26]  S. Gierek-Ciaciura,et al.  A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses , 2009, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[27]  S. Lane,et al.  Performance of presbyopia‐correcting intraocular lenses in distance optical bench tests , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[28]  Huanqing Guo,et al.  Blur limits for defocus, astigmatism and trefoil , 2009, Vision Research.

[29]  W. Trattler,et al.  Presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses , 2009, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[30]  Hélène Rouger,et al.  Through-focus visual performance measurements and predictions with multifocal contact lenses , 2009, Vision Research.

[31]  J. Alfonso,et al.  Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[32]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Combining coma with astigmatism can improve retinal image over astigmatism alone , 2010, Vision Research.

[33]  Austin Roorda,et al.  Adaptive optics for studying visual function: a comprehensive review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[34]  P. Morgan,et al.  An international survey of contact lens prescribing for presbyopia , 2010, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[35]  Susan C. Han,et al.  Clinical Assessment of a Customized Free-Form Progressive Add Lens Spectacle , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.