Getting into the groove: Opportunities to enhance the ecological value of hard coastal infrastructure using fine-scale surface textures

Concrete flood defences, erosion control structures, port and harbour facilities, and renewable energy infrastructure are increasingly being built in the world’s coastal regions. There is, however, strong evidence to suggest that these structures are poor surrogates for natural rocky shores, often supporting assemblages with lower species abundance and diversity. Ecological engineering opportunities to enhance structures for biodiversity conservation (and other management goals) are therefore being sought, but the majority of work so far has concentrated on structural design features at the centimetre–meter scale. We deployed concrete tiles with four easily-reproducible fine-scale (millimetre) textures (control, smoothed, grooved and exposed aggregate) in the intertidal zone to test opportunities for facilitating colonisation by a dominant ecosystem engineer (barnacles) relative to natural rock. Concrete texture had a significant effect on colonisation; smoothed tiles supported significantly fewer numbers of barnacles, and those with intermediate roughness (grooved concrete) significantly greater numbers, after one settlement season. The successful recruitment of early colonists is a critical stage in the development of more complex and diverse macrobenthic assemblages, especially those that provide physical habitat structure for other species. Our observations show that this can be facilitated relatively simply for barnacles on marine concrete by manipulating surface heterogeneity at a millimetre scale. Alongside other larger-scale manipulation (e.g. creating holes and pools), including fine-scale habitat heterogeneity in engineering designs can support international efforts to maximise the ecological value of marine urban infrastructure.

[1]  David M. Kennedy,et al.  Rock coast geomorphology : a global synthesis , 2014 .

[2]  Lluís Gómez-Pujol,et al.  Colonization and weathering of engineering materials by marine microorganisms: an SEM study , 2011 .

[3]  W. E. Bros Effects of removing or adding structure (barnacle shells) on recruitment to a fouling community in Tampa Bay, Florida , 1987 .

[4]  Hills Jm,et al.  A multi-scale analysis of settlement density and pattern dynamics of the barnacle Semibalanus balanoides , 1996 .

[5]  J. Connell The Influence of Interspecific Competition and Other Factors on the Distribution of the Barnacle Chthamalus Stellatus , 1961 .

[6]  T. Farrell MODELS AND MECHANISMS OF SUCCESSION: AN EXAMPLE FROM A ROCKY INTERTIDAL COMMUNITY' , 1991 .

[7]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Effects of substratum on the recruitment and development of an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage , 1994 .

[8]  Chad L. Hewitt,et al.  Nonindigenous biota on artificial structures: could habitat creation facilitate biological invasions? , 2007 .

[9]  K. Jax Ecological engineering. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Nick Aldred,et al.  Attachment strength is a key factor in the selection of surfaces by barnacle cyprids (Balanus amphitrite) during settlement , 2010, Biofouling.

[11]  Leonie A. Robinson,et al.  Predicting Free-Space Occupancy on Novel Artificial Structures by an Invasive Intertidal Barnacle Using a Removal Experiment , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  J. Thomason,et al.  The relative magnitude of the effects of biological and physical settlement cues for cypris larvae of the acorn barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides L. , 2009, Biofouling.

[13]  Katharina Helming,et al.  Multifunctional Land Use , 2007 .

[14]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Between a rock and a hard place: Environmental and engineering considerations when designing coastal defence structures , 2014 .

[15]  Justin P. Wright,et al.  The Concept of Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers Ten Years On: Progress, Limitations, and Challenges , 2006 .

[16]  J. Connell The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs. post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities , 1985 .

[17]  G. Williams,et al.  Microspatial variation in marine biofilm abundance on intertidal rock surfaces , 2006 .

[18]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services , 2007 .

[19]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments , 2010 .

[20]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non‐indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea , 2005 .

[21]  H. Burcharth,et al.  Environmental Design Guidelines for Low Crested Coastal Structures , 2007 .

[22]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Facilitating ecological enhancement of coastal infrastructure: The role of policy, people and planning , 2012 .

[23]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[24]  M. Chapman,et al.  Mitigating against the loss of species by adding artificial intertidal pools to existing seawalls , 2014 .

[25]  Grete E. Dinesen,et al.  Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: Using ecological criteria in design , 2005 .

[26]  Joseph H. Connell,et al.  On the mechanisms producing successional change , 1987 .

[27]  M. Öhman,et al.  The influence of offshore windpower on demersal fish , 2006 .

[28]  Vallam Sundar,et al.  Artificial Reefs: A Review , 2013 .

[29]  B. J. Wilson,et al.  Biologically generated habitat provision and diversity of rocky shore organisms at a hierarchy of spatial scales , 1996 .

[30]  M. Faimali,et al.  Fouling on Artificial Substrata , 2010 .

[31]  D. Crisp,et al.  THE ORIENTATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF BARNACLES AT SETTLEMENT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO SURFACE CONTOUR , 1954 .

[32]  M. Coombes Biogeomorphology of Coastal Structures: Understanding interactions between hard substrata and colonising organisms as a tool for ecological enhancement , 2011 .

[33]  M. Chapman,et al.  Ecologically informed engineering reduces loss of intertidal biodiversity on artificial shorelines. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  M. Chapman,et al.  Intertidal assemblages on seawalls and vertical rocky shores in Sydney Harbour, Australia , 2005 .

[35]  J. Roughgarden,et al.  Larval settlement rate: A leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Chapman,et al.  Ecological interactions in the provision of habitat by urban development: whelks and engineering by oysters on artificial seawalls , 2008 .

[37]  E. Bourget,et al.  Influence of substratum heterogeneity and settled barnacle density on the settlement of cypris larvae , 1988 .

[38]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  The importance of water‐retaining features for biodiversity on artificial intertidal coastal defence structures , 2013 .

[39]  L. Airoldi,et al.  Loss, status and trends for coastal marine habitats of Europe , 2007 .

[40]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Enhancing stocks of the exploited limpet Patella candei d’Orbigny via modifications in coastal engineering , 2010 .

[41]  J. Lundholm,et al.  MINI‐REVIEW: Habitat analogues for reconciliation ecology in urban and industrial environments , 2010 .

[42]  A. Southward Barnacles : keys and notes for the identification of British species , 2008 .

[43]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Complex interactions in a rapidly changing world: responses of rocky shore communities to recent climate change , 2008 .

[44]  M. Baine,et al.  Artificial reefs: a review of their design, application, management and performance , 2001 .

[45]  R. Buckley,et al.  Ecological Interactions , 1986, Science.

[46]  Sébastien Dupray The use of concrete in maritime engineering : - a guide to good practice , 2010 .

[47]  F. Bulleri Is it time for urban ecology to include the marine realm? , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Evaluation of ecological engineering of "armoured" shorelines to improve their value as habitat. , 2011 .

[49]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Role of recruitment in causing differences between intertidal assemblages on seawalls and rocky shores , 2005 .

[50]  M. Chapman,et al.  Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity , 2009, Oecologia.

[51]  C. Harley,et al.  Non-linear density-dependent effects of an intertidal ecosystem engineer , 2011, Oecologia.

[52]  P. Raimondi Patterns, Mechanisms, Consequences of Variability in Settlement and Recruitment of an Intertidal Barnacle , 1990 .

[53]  M. McKinney,et al.  Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization , 2006 .

[54]  M. C. Sueiro,et al.  Habitat complexity and community composition: relationships between different ecosystem engineers and the associated macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2011, Helgoland Marine Research.

[55]  K. Laland,et al.  The Implications of Niche Construction and Ecosystem Engineering for Conservation Biology , 2006 .

[56]  L. Naylor,et al.  Rock warming and drying under simulated intertidal conditions, part II: weathering and biological influences on evaporative cooling and near‐surface micro‐climatic conditions as an example of biogeomorphic ecosystem engineering , 2012 .

[57]  James L. Fridley,et al.  Design principles for ecological engineering , 2001 .

[58]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Climate change and adaptational impacts in coastal systems: the case of sea defences. , 2013, Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts.

[59]  T. Wilding,et al.  The physical and chemical performance of artificial reef blocks made using quarry by-products , 2002 .

[60]  K. McGuinness Effects of some natural and artificial substrata on sessile marine organisms at Galeta Reef, Panama. , 1989 .

[61]  P. Hulme Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization , 2009 .

[62]  S. Hawkins,et al.  The influence of epilithic microbial films on the settlement of Semibalanus balanoides cyprids : a comparison between laboratory and field experiments , 1998 .

[63]  Elizabeth P. ANDERSONa,et al.  AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 2013 .

[64]  E. Bourget,et al.  Importance of physical and biological settlement cues used at different spatial scales by the larvae of Semibalanus balanoides , 1988 .

[65]  J. Pethick,et al.  Coastal management and sea-level rise , 2001 .

[66]  E. Schwindt,et al.  Effect of the substratum in the recruitment and survival of the introduced barnacle Balanus glandula (Darwin 1854) in Patagonia, Argentina , 2010 .

[67]  S. Hawkins Marine conservation in a rapidly changing world , 2012 .

[68]  D. Wethey,et al.  Settlement and early post-settlement survival of sessile marine invertebrates on topographically complex surfaces: the importance of refuge dimensions and adult morphology , 1996 .

[69]  M. Luckenbach Settlement and early post-settlement survival in the recruitment of Mulinia lateralis (Bivalvia) , 1984 .

[70]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Bioprotection and disturbance: Seaweed, microclimatic stability and conditions for mechanical weathering in the intertidal zone , 2013 .

[71]  K. Gaston,et al.  REVIEW: Managing urban ecosystems for goods and services , 2013 .

[72]  J. Hills,et al.  The effect of scales of surface roughness on the settlement of barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides) cyprids , 1998 .

[73]  A. Decho Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview , 2000 .

[74]  Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection , 2011 .

[75]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defence structures , 2005 .

[76]  D. Wethey Ranking of settlement cues by barnacle larvae: influence of surface contour , 1986 .

[77]  C. Harley Effects of physical ecosystem engineering and herbivory on intertidal community structure , 2006 .

[78]  Jize Mao,et al.  Influence of marine microorganisms on the permeability and microstructure of mortar , 2015 .

[79]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Effect of rock type on the recruitment and early mortality of the barnacle Chthamalus montagui , 2006 .

[80]  P. I. Miller,et al.  Assessing wave energy effects on biodiversity: the Wave Hub experience , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[81]  M. Barnes The use of intertidal barnacle shells , 2000 .

[82]  J. Lawton,et al.  Organisms as ecosystem engineers , 1994 .

[83]  R. T. L. Allen,et al.  Concrete in Coastal Structures , 1998 .

[84]  B. Menge RECRUITMENT VS. POSTRECRUITMENT PROCESSES AS DETERMINANTS OF BARNACLE POPULATION ABUNDANCE , 2000 .