Shape fidelity and structure of 3D printed high consistency nanocellulose

The aim of the present study was to investigate the additive manufacturing process for high consistency nanocellulose. Unlike thermoformable plastics, wood derived nanocelluloses are typically processed as aqueous dispersions because they are not melt-processable on their own. The ability to use nanocellulose directly in additive manufacturing broadens the possibilities regarding usable raw materials and achievable properties thereof. Modern additive manufacturing systems are capable of depositing nanocellulose with micrometer precision, which enables the printing of accurate three-dimensional wet structures. Typically, these wet structures are produced from dilute aqueous fibrillar dispersions. As a consequence of the high water content, the structures deform and shrink during drying unless the constructs are freeze-dried. While freeze-drying preserves the geometry, it results in high porosity which manifests as poor mechanical and barrier properties. Herein, we study an additive manufacturing process for high consistency enzymatically fibrillated cellulose nanofibers in terms of printability, shape retention, structure, and mechanical properties. Particular emphasis is placed on quantitative shape analysis based on 3D scanning, point cloud analysis, and x-ray microtomography. Despite substantial volumetric as well as anisotropic deformation, we demonstrate repeatability of the printed construct and its properties.

[1]  O. Rojas,et al.  Low Solids Emulsion Gels Based on Nanocellulose for 3D-Printing. , 2018, Biomacromolecules.

[2]  Reinhard Klein,et al.  Efficient RANSAC for Point‐Cloud Shape Detection , 2007, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[3]  Ashlie Martini,et al.  Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  Marielle Henriksson,et al.  Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  Isaac N. Bankman,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging. Processing and Analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Junhe Yang,et al.  3D bioprinting of cellulose with controlled porous structures from NMMO , 2018 .

[7]  Stylianos Dritsas,et al.  Large-scale additive manufacturing with bioinspired cellulosic materials , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Liang Hou,et al.  Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review , 2013 .

[9]  D. Klemm,et al.  Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[10]  R. C. Macridis.  A review , 1963 .

[11]  Peter Enoksson,et al.  Solidification of 3D Printed Nanofibril Hydrogels into Functional 3D Cellulose Structures , 2016 .

[12]  Conner K. Dunn,et al.  Direct Ink Write (DIW) 3D Printed Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerogel Structures , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Kristin Syverud,et al.  3D Bioprinting of Carboxymethylated-Periodate Oxidized Nanocellulose Constructs for Wound Dressing Applications , 2015, BioMed research international.

[14]  Anthony L Andrady,et al.  Microplastics in the marine environment. , 2011, Marine pollution bulletin.

[15]  Juha Salmela,et al.  Flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose in shear flow , 2012, Cellulose.

[16]  Akira Isogai,et al.  An ultrastrong nanofibrillar biomaterial: the strength of single cellulose nanofibrils revealed via sonication-induced fragmentation. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  H. Tse,et al.  Plastic waste in the marine environment: A review of sources, occurrence and effects. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  Stuart R. Stock,et al.  MicroComputed Tomography: Methodology and Applications , 2008 .

[19]  Brian Mirtich,et al.  Fast and Accurate Computation of Polyhedral Mass Properties , 1996, J. Graphics, GPU, & Game Tools.

[20]  Jun Liu,et al.  3D printing with cellulose materials , 2018, Cellulose.

[21]  Niklas Sandler,et al.  Three-Dimensional Printing of Wood-Derived Biopolymers: A Review Focused on Biomedical Applications , 2018, ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering.

[22]  David Plackett,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review , 2010 .

[23]  Gunnar Henriksson,et al.  An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers , 2007 .

[24]  X. Zou,et al.  3D PRINTING – A REVIEW OF TECHNOLOGIES, MARKETS, AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE FOREST INDUSTRY , 2016 .

[25]  R. Wildman,et al.  Three dimensional ink-jet printing of biomaterials using ionic liquids and co-solvents. , 2016, Faraday discussions.

[26]  Carmen C Piras,et al.  Nanocellulosic materials as bioinks for 3D bioprinting. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[27]  Federico Parietti,et al.  3D printing by fused deposition modeling (FDM) of a swellable/erodible capsular device for oral pulsatile release of drugs , 2015 .

[28]  Alain Dufresne,et al.  Mechanical behavior of sheets prepared from sugar beet cellulose microfibrils , 1997 .

[29]  Juha Salmela,et al.  The effect of wall depletion on the rheology of microfibrillated cellulose water suspensions by optical coherence tomography , 2014, Cellulose.

[30]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[31]  Pirjo Kääriäinen,et al.  Surface tailoring and design-driven prototyping of fabrics with 3D-printing: An all-cellulose approach , 2018 .

[32]  Pekka Pursula,et al.  3D-Printable Bioactivated Nanocellulose-Alginate Hydrogels. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[33]  Jesús Armengol,et al.  Myopia Control with a Novel Peripheral Gradient Soft Lens and Orthokeratology: A 2-Year Clinical Trial , 2015, BioMed research international.

[34]  Alejandro H. Espera,et al.  Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed polymers , 2018 .

[35]  Vojislav Petrovic,et al.  Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies , 2011 .

[36]  K. Leong,et al.  3D Bioprinting of Highly Thixotropic Alginate/Methylcellulose Hydrogel with Strong Interface Bonding. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[37]  Barry Berman,et al.  3D printing: the new industrial revolution , 2012, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[38]  Paul Gatenholm,et al.  3D Bioprinting of Cellulose Structures from an Ionic Liquid , 2014 .

[39]  Peter Enoksson,et al.  Tailor-made conductive inks from cellulose nanofibrils for 3D printing of neural guidelines. , 2018, Carbohydrate polymers.

[40]  A. John Hart,et al.  Additive Manufacturing of Cellulosic Materials with Robust Mechanics and Antimicrobial Functionality , 2017 .

[41]  Conner K. Dunn,et al.  Direct Ink Write 3D Printed Cellulose Nanofiber Aerogel Structures with Highly Deformable, Shape Recoverable, and Functionalizable Properties , 2018 .

[42]  J. Gagné.  Literature Review , 2018, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[43]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Bioprinting of Thermoresponsive Hydrogels for Next Generation Tissue Engineering: A Review , 2017 .

[44]  T. Turpeinen.  Analysis of microtomographic images of porous heterogeneous materials , 2015 .

[45]  Kristiina Oksman,et al.  Rheological properties of nanocellulose suspensions: effects of fibril/particle dimensions and surface characteristics , 2017, Cellulose.

[46]  P. Gatenholm,et al.  3D Bioprinting Human Chondrocytes with Nanocellulose-Alginate Bioink for Cartilage Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2015, Biomacromolecules.

[47]  P. Hart.  The New Industrial Revolution , 1986 .