Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom

Emphasis on tracking and ability grouping as sources of inequality and as goals for reform ignores processes of stratification within heterogeneous classrooms. Research literature on effects of classroom status inequality is reviewed. The article presents a test of two interventions derived from expectation states theory and designed to counteract the process of stratification in classrooms using academically heterogeneous small groups. The design focuses on variation in the frequency with which teachers carried out status treatments in 13 elementary school classrooms, all of which were using the same curriculum and the same system of classroom management. There was good support for the hypotheses that the use of status treatments would be associated with higher rates of participation of low-status students and would have no effect on the participation of high-status students. Analysis at the classroom level revealed that more frequent use of these treatments was associated with more equal-status interaction.

[1]  Paul Humphreys,et al.  Theoretical Consequences of the Status Characteristics Formulation , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Joan Z. Spade,et al.  CURRICULUM TRACKING AND STATUS MAINTENANCE , 1987 .

[3]  L. Hudson.  Frames of Mind: Ability, Perception and Self-Perception in the Arts and Sciences , 1970 .

[4]  Shlomo Sharan,et al.  Language and learning in the cooperative classroom , 1988 .

[5]  Martha Foschi,et al.  Status Generalization: New Theory and Research. , 1989 .

[6]  M. Hallinan.  The Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Response to Slavin’s Best-Evidence Synthesis , 1990 .

[7]  D. Entwisle,et al.  Raising Children's Expectations for Their Own Performance. , 1970 .

[8]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Can Classrooms Learn , 1989 .

[9]  Marlaine E. Lockheed,et al.  Sex and Social Influence: Does Sex Function as a Status Characteristic in Mixed-Sex Groups of Children?. , 1983 .

[10]  The Center for Interracial Cooperation: A Field Experiment. , 1976 .

[11]  N. Webb.  Peer interaction and learning in small groups , 1989 .

[12]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status Characteristics and Social Interaction , 1972 .

[13]  J. Tammivaara.  The Effects of Task Structure on Beliefs about Competence and Participation in Small Groups. , 1982 .

[14]  R. Sternberg.  Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence , 1984 .

[15]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  The Social Context of Instruction. Group Organization and Group Processes. [Papers Presented at a Conference Held at The Wisconsin Center for Education Research (Madison, May 1982).]. , 1987 .

[16]  S. Rothman,et al.  Structuring Schools for Student Success: A Focus on Ability Grouping. , 1990 .

[17]  Adam Gamoran,et al.  The Stratification of High School Learning Opportunities. , 1987 .

[18]  D. Eder.  Ability Grouping as a Self-Fulfiling Prophecy: A Micro-Analysis of Teacher-Student Interaction. , 1981 .

[19]  B. Anderson,et al.  Sociological theories in progress , 1966 .

[20]  Joseph Berger,et al.  STATUS ORGANIZING PROCESSES , 1980 .

[21]  J. Driskell,et al.  Beauty as Status , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Myron H. Dembo,et al.  Effects of perceived ability and grade status on social interaction and influence in cooperative groups. , 1987 .

[23]  Louise C Wilkinson,et al.  Instructional groups in the classroom: Organization and processes , 1984 .

[24]  M. Webster,et al.  Sources of self-evaluation;: A formal theory of significant others and social influence , 1976 .

[25]  Elizabeth L. Useem.  Middle schools and math groups: Parents' involvement in children's placement. , 1992 .

[26]  M. H. Fisek,et al.  Consistent and inconsistent status characteristics and the determination of power and prestige orders. , 1970, Sociometry.

[27]  H. Jones,et al.  Frames of Mind , 1969, Mental Health.

[28]  J. Finn,et al.  Participation and Withdrawal Among Fourth-Grade Pupils , 1992 .

[29]  E. Cohen,et al.  EXPECTATION STATES AND INTERRACIAL INTERACTION IN SCHOOL SETTINGS , 1982 .

[30]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Expectation States Theory: A Theoretical Research Program , 1981 .

[31]  Joseph Berger,et al.  Status, rewards, and influence , 1985 .

[32]  J. Oakes,et al.  Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. , 1986 .