Three-dimensional view of the surface motif associated with the P-loop structure: cis and trans cases of convergent evolution.

Here we identify the determinants of the nucleotide-binding ability associated with the P-loop-containing proteins, inferring their functional importance from their structural convergence to a unique three- dimensional (3D) motif. (1) A new surface 3D pattern is identified for the P-loop nucleotide-binding region, which is more selective than the corresponding sequence pattern; (2) the signature displays one residue that we propose is the determinant for the guanine-binding ability (the residues aligned to ras D119; this residue is known to be important only in the G-proteins, we extend the prediction to all the other P-loop- containing proteins); and (3) two cases of convergent evolution at the molecular level are highlighted in the analysis of the active site: the positive charge aligned to ras K117 and the arginine residues aligned to the GAP arginine finger. The analysis of the residues conserved on protein surfaces allows one to identify new functional or evolutionary relationships among protein structures that would not be detectable by conventional sequence or structure comparison methods.

[1]  Robert D. Finn,et al.  Pfam 3.1: 1313 multiple alignments and profile HMMs match the majority of proteins , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[2]  G. Schulz,et al.  Structure of a mutant adenylate kinase ligated with an ATP-analogue showing domain closure over ATP. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  W. Merrick,et al.  GTP-binding domain: three consensus sequence elements with distinct spacing. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  D. Gallwitz,et al.  Identification of the catalytic domains and their functionally critical arginine residues of two yeast GTPase‐activating proteins specific for Ypt/Rab transport GTPases , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[5]  L. Wyns,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the contribution of Glu46 and Asn98 to the guanosine specificity of ribonuclease T1. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[6]  Annabel E. Todd,et al.  From protein structure to function. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[7]  I R Vetter,et al.  Nucleoside triphosphate-binding proteins: different scaffolds to achieve phosphoryl transfer , 1999, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[8]  H. Kalbitzer,et al.  Nucleotide-binding characteristics of human guanylate-binding protein 1 (hGBP1) and identification of the third GTP-binding motif. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Gregory R. Hoffman,et al.  Structures of Cdc42 bound to the active and catalytically compromised forms of Cdc42GAP , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[10]  I. Schlichting,et al.  Structural basis for efficient phosphorylation of 3'-azidothymidine monophosphate by Escherichia coli thymidylate kinase. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Katrin Rittinger,et al.  Structure at 1.65 Å of RhoA and its GTPase-activating protein in complex with a transition-state analogue , 1997, Nature.

[12]  C. Sander,et al.  GTPase domains of ras p21 oncogene protein and elongation factor Tu: analysis of three-dimensional structures, sequence families, and functional sites. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  A Valencia,et al.  The ras protein family: evolutionary tree and role of conserved amino acids. , 1991, Biochemistry.

[14]  V. Gerke,et al.  Conserved charged residues in the leucine-rich repeat domain of the Ran GTPase activating protein are required for Ran binding and GTPase activation. , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[15]  M. Helmer-Citterich,et al.  Three-dimensional profiles: a new tool to identify protein surface similarities. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  C Sander,et al.  An evolutionary treasure: unification of a broad set of amidohydrolases related to urease , 1997, Proteins.

[17]  F. Bischoff,et al.  Structural Differences in the Minimal Catalytic Domains of the GTPase-activating Proteins p120GAP and Neurofibromin* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Frank McCormick,et al.  The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism , 1991, Nature.

[19]  C. Sander,et al.  Database of homology‐derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment , 1991, Proteins.

[20]  A G Murzin,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Crystal Structure of the Sulfotransferase Domain of Human Heparan Sulfate N-Deacetylase/ N-Sulfotransferase 1* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[23]  C Sander,et al.  Mapping the Protein Universe , 1996, Science.

[24]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H‐ras p21 at 1.35 A resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[25]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  L. Pedersen,et al.  Crystal structure of estrogen sulphotransferase , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  M. Rodnina,et al.  Stimulation of the GTPase Activity of Translation Elongation Factor G by Ribosomal Protein L7/12* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[28]  G. Schneider,et al.  Snapshot of a phosphorylated substrate intermediate by kinetic crystallography. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  A. Wittinghofer,et al.  Structure of human guanylate-binding protein 1 representing a unique class of GTP-binding proteins , 2000, Nature.

[30]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Domain swapping: entangling alliances between proteins. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  M. Gribskov,et al.  [9] Profile analysis , 1990 .

[32]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Structure of the guanine-nucleotide-binding domain of the Ha-ras oncogene product p21 in the triphosphate conformation , 1989, Nature.

[33]  T. Kinzy,et al.  Mutations in a GTP-binding Motif of Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 1A Reduce Both Translational Fidelity and the Requirement for Nucleotide Exchange* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Modification of ribonuclease T1 specificity by random mutagenesis of the substrate binding segment. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[35]  H. Hamm,et al.  GTPase mechanism of Gproteins from the 1.7-Å crystal structure of transducin α - GDP AIF−4 , 1994, Nature.

[36]  S R Sprang,et al.  G protein mechanisms: insights from structural analysis. , 1997, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  J. Goldberg Structural and Functional Analysis of the ARF1–ARFGAP Complex Reveals a Role for Coatomer in GTP Hydrolysis , 1999, Cell.

[38]  T. Powers,et al.  Reciprocal stimulation of GTP hydrolysis by two directly interacting GTPases , 1995, Science.

[39]  S. Kim,et al.  Structure-based assignment of the biochemical function of a hypothetical protein: a test case of structural genomics. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  J. Marsh,et al.  The GTPase superfamily , 1993 .

[41]  J. Walker,et al.  Distantly related sequences in the alpha‐ and beta‐subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP‐requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[42]  W. Kabsch,et al.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. , 1997, Science.

[43]  S. Hattori,et al.  Mutations of the ras gene product p21 that abolish guanine nucleotide binding. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  P. R. Sibbald,et al.  The P-loop--a common motif in ATP- and GTP-binding proteins. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.