A micropolar peridynamic model with non-uniform horizon for static damage of solids considering different nonlocal enhancements

Abstract Peridynamic models typically adopt regular point distributions and uniform horizons, limiting their flexibility and engineering applicability. In this work, a micropolar peridynamics approach with a non-uniform horizon (NHPD) is proposed. This approach is implemented in a conventional finite element framework using element-based discretization. Through modification of the dual-horizon approach in the preprocessing step, a point-dependent horizon and non-uniform beam-like bonds are built. By a domain correction strategy, the equivalence of the strain energy density is assured. Then, a novel energy–density-based failure criterion that directly relates the critical stretch to the mechanical strength is presented. The numerical results indicate the weak mesh dependency of NHPD and the effectiveness of the new failure criterion for Brazilian disk tests. Moreover, damage to solids with different nonlocal effects is shown to yield similar results through adjustment of only the mechanical strength.

[1]  J. Labuz,et al.  Simulating fracture in rock using a micropolar peridynamic formulation , 2020 .

[2]  Qizhi Zhu,et al.  A local strain-based implementation strategy for the extended peridynamic model with bond rotation , 2020 .

[3]  Christian Miehe,et al.  Phase field modeling of fracture in multi-physics problems. Part I. Balance of crack surface and failure criteria for brittle crack propagation in thermo-elastic solids , 2015 .

[4]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  Nonlocal operator method with numerical integration for gradient solid , 2020 .

[5]  Yong Yuan,et al.  Peridynamic modeling of prefabricated beams post‐cast with steelfiber reinforced high‐strength concrete , 2020, Structural Concrete.

[6]  Gilles Lubineau,et al.  Coupling of nonlocal and local continuum models by the Arlequin approach , 2012 .

[7]  M. F. Marji,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of Brazilian discs with multiple parallel cracks , 2015, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[8]  Qing Zhang,et al.  A modified conjugated bond-based peridynamic analysis for impact failure of concrete gravity dam , 2020 .

[9]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Dual-horizon peridynamics: A stable solution to varying horizons , 2017, 1703.05910.

[10]  Gao-Feng Zhao,et al.  Developing a four-dimensional lattice spring model for mechanical responses of solids , 2017 .

[11]  Haitao Yu,et al.  A generalized bond-based peridynamic model for quasi-brittle materials enriched with bond tension–rotation–shear coupling effects , 2020 .

[12]  Deane Roehl,et al.  Discrete fracture propagation analysis using a robust combined continuation method , 2020 .

[13]  C. Xia,et al.  Propagation and coalescence of quasi-static cracks in Brazilian disks: an insight from a phase field model , 2018, Acta Geotechnica.

[14]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A method for dynamic crack and shear band propagation with phantom nodes , 2006 .

[15]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A constitutive-based element-by-element crack propagation algorithm with local mesh refinement , 2015 .

[16]  Florin Bobaru,et al.  Surface corrections for peridynamic models in elasticity and fracture , 2017, Computational Mechanics.

[17]  Yiming Liu,et al.  Nonlocal Peridynamic Modeling and Simulation on Crack Propagation in Concrete Structures , 2015 .

[18]  John T. Foster,et al.  An energy based failure criterion for use with peridynamic states , 2011 .

[19]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Cracking elements method for dynamic brittle fracture , 2019, Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics.

[20]  Kourosh Shahriar,et al.  Experimental and numerical study of crack propagation and coalescence in pre-cracked rock-like disks , 2014 .

[21]  Vinh Phu Nguyen,et al.  A length scale insensitive phase-field damage model for brittle fracture , 2018, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids.

[22]  Qi-Zhi Zhu,et al.  Peridynamic formulations enriched with bond rotation effects , 2017 .

[23]  Vito Diana,et al.  A full orthotropic micropolar peridynamic formulation for linearly elastic solids , 2019, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[24]  J. Shao,et al.  A new bond model in peridynamics theory for progressive failure in cohesive brittle materials , 2020 .

[25]  Xiaoqiao He,et al.  A peridynamics-based cohesive zone model (PD-CZM) for predicting cohesive crack propagation , 2020 .

[26]  Yiming Zhang,et al.  A softening-healing law for self-healing quasi-brittle materials: analyzing with Strong Discontinuity embedded Approach , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  Giulia Sarego,et al.  A discussion on failure criteria for ordinary state-based Peridynamics , 2017 .

[28]  C. Cyron,et al.  Dirichlet absorbing boundary conditions for classical and peridynamic diffusion-type models , 2020, Computational Mechanics.

[29]  Jian-Ying Wu,et al.  A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure , 2017 .

[30]  Christophe Geuzaine,et al.  Gmsh: A 3‐D finite element mesh generator with built‐in pre‐ and post‐processing facilities , 2009 .

[31]  R. Ballarini,et al.  Crack kinking in isotropic and orthotropic micropolar peridynamic solids , 2020 .

[32]  Yiming Zhang,et al.  Cracking elements method with 6-node triangular element , 2020 .

[33]  Pablo Seleson,et al.  Bond-Based Peridynamics: a Tale of Two Poisson’s Ratios , 2020, Journal of Peridynamics and Nonlocal Modeling.

[34]  X. Cui,et al.  An implicit dual‐based approach to couple peridynamics with classical continuum mechanics , 2019, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[35]  Nicolas Sau,et al.  Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures , 2007 .

[36]  Yiming Zhang,et al.  Strong discontinuity embedded approach with standard SOS formulation: Element formulation, energy-based crack-tracking strategy, and validations , 2015 .

[37]  Selda Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamic thermal diffusion , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[38]  Qing Zhang,et al.  Voronoi‐based peridynamics and cracking analysis with adaptive refinement , 2017 .

[39]  T. Belytschko,et al.  A three dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks , 2007 .

[40]  S. Silling Reformulation of Elasticity Theory for Discontinuities and Long-Range Forces , 2000 .

[41]  Erkan Oterkus,et al.  Peridynamic Theory and Its Applications , 2013 .

[42]  Jian-Ying Wu,et al.  An improved stable XFEM (Is-XFEM) with a novel enrichment function for the computational modeling of cohesive cracks , 2015 .

[43]  Hong Zheng,et al.  New strategies for some issues of numerical manifold method in simulation of crack propagation , 2014 .

[44]  H. Nguyen-Xuan,et al.  A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment , 2010 .

[45]  Mirco Zaccariotto,et al.  An adaptive multi-grid peridynamic method for dynamic fracture analysis , 2018, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences.

[46]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges , 2013 .

[47]  Vito Diana,et al.  A bond-based micropolar peridynamic model with shear deformability: Elasticity, failure properties and initial yield domains , 2019, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[48]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Cracking particles: a simplified meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks , 2004 .

[49]  Adnan Ibrahimbegovic,et al.  Lattice Element Models and Their Peculiarities , 2017, Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.

[50]  John S. Campbell,et al.  Local and global smoothing of discontinuous finite element functions using a least squares method , 1974 .

[51]  V. Carvelli,et al.  An electromechanical micropolar peridynamic model , 2020 .

[52]  P. Qiao,et al.  A new bond failure criterion for ordinary state-based peridynamic mode II fracture analysis , 2019, International Journal of Fracture.

[53]  Yiming Zhang,et al.  Global cracking elements: A novel tool for Galerkin‐based approaches simulating quasi‐brittle fracture , 2019, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering.

[54]  X. Zhuang,et al.  Cracking elements: A self-propagating Strong Discontinuity embedded Approach for quasi-brittle fracture , 2018 .

[55]  Giulia Sarego,et al.  Examples of applications of the peridynamic theory to the solution of static equilibrium problems , 2015, The Aeronautical Journal.

[56]  M. Ayatollahi,et al.  Analysis of a new specimen for mixed mode fracture tests on brittle materials , 2009 .

[57]  Louis Ngai Yuen Wong,et al.  A Cohesive Element-Based Numerical Manifold Method for Hydraulic Fracturing Modelling with Voronoi Grains , 2019, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[58]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics , 2014, Computational Mechanics.

[59]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  Dual‐horizon peridynamics , 2015, 1506.05146.

[60]  Timon Rabczuk,et al.  A peridynamics formulation for quasi-static fracture and contact in rock , 2017 .

[61]  Hong Zheng,et al.  A four-node quadrilateral element fitted to numerical manifold method with continuous nodal stress for crack analysis , 2016 .

[62]  S. Silling Stability of peridynamic correspondence material models and their particle discretizations , 2016 .

[63]  Yiheng Zhang,et al.  The review of the bond-based peridynamics modeling , 2019, Journal of Micromechanics and Molecular Physics.

[64]  T. Rabczuk,et al.  A higher order nonlocal operator method for solving partial differential equations , 2020 .