The different audiences of science communication: A segmentation analysis of the Swiss population’s perceptions of science and their information and media use patterns
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mike S. Schäfer | S. Kristiansen | Tobias Füchslin | Julia Metag | Adrian Rauchfleisch | Silje Kristiansen
[1] Yoram Wind,et al. Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research , 1978 .
[2] M. Slater. Theory and method in health audience segmentation. , 1996, Journal of health communication.
[3] Gerald M. Kosicki,et al. Cognitive strategies for media use during a presidential campaign , 1996 .
[4] William P. Eveland. The Cognitive Mediation Model of Learning From the News , 2001, Commun. Res..
[5] I. Ajzen. Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.
[6] R. Pardo,et al. Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis , 2002 .
[7] I. Ajzen. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. , 2002 .
[8] Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al. Knowledge, Reservations, or Promise? , 2002, Commun. Res..
[9] Jean-François Rouet,et al. Effects of Online Reading on Popular Science Comprehension , 2003 .
[10] R. Pardo,et al. The Cognitive Dimension of Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues , 2004 .
[11] Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al. Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies , 2005 .
[12] Sharon Dunwoody,et al. Seeking and Processing Information about Impersonal Risk , 2006 .
[13] G. Hancock,et al. Understanding Consumers' Health Information Preferences Development and Validation of a Brief Screening Instrument , 2006, Journal of health communication.
[14] S. Noar,et al. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.
[15] S. Bamberg,et al. Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour , 2007 .
[16] M. Bucchi,et al. Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology , 2008 .
[17] Sally Dibb,et al. Bridging the segmentation theory/practice divide , 2009 .
[18] Mike S. Schäfer. From Public Understanding to Public Engagement , 2009 .
[19] L. Kahlor,et al. If We Seek, Do We Learn? , 2009 .
[20] William P. Eveland,et al. Exposure, Attention, or “Use” of News? Assessing Aspects of the Reliability and Validity of a Central Concept in Political Communication Research , 2009 .
[21] Niels Mejlgaard,et al. Participation and competence as joint components in a cross-national analysis of scientific citizenship , 2010 .
[22] Lynne Doner Lotenberg,et al. Segmentation and Targeting , 2011 .
[23] Bernadette Sütterlin,et al. Who puts the most energy into energy conservation? A segmentation of energy consumers based on energy-related behavioral characteristics , 2011 .
[24] Katarina Prpić,et al. Science, the public, and social elites: How the general public, scientists, top politicians and managers perceive science , 2011, Public understanding of science.
[25] C. K. Mertz,et al. Identifying Like-Minded Audiences for Global Warming Public Engagement Campaigns: An Audience Segmentation Analysis and Tool Development , 2011, PloS one.
[26] Drew A. Linzer,et al. poLCA: An R Package for Polytomous Variable Latent Class Analysis , 2011 .
[27] Albert C. Gunther,et al. The Influence of Presumed Media Influence on News About Science and Scientists , 2011 .
[28] Mario Gollwitzer,et al. Latent-Class-Analysis , 2012 .
[29] M. Hurtado,et al. Political dimensions of scientific culture: Highlights from the Ibero-American survey on the social perception of science and scientific culture , 2012 .
[30] Mike S. Schäfer. Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science , 2012, Public understanding of science.
[31] Minoru Nakayama,et al. A survey of scientific literacy to provide a foundation for designing science communication in Japan , 2013, Public understanding of science.
[32] J. Besley. The State of Public Opinion Research on Attitudes and Understanding of Science and Technology , 2013 .
[33] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. Science, New Media, and the Public , 2013, Science.
[34] A comparison between attitudes to climate change in Australia and the United States , 2013 .
[35] F. C. D. Roten. Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe , 2013 .
[36] D. Brossard. New media landscapes and the science information consumer , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] D. Scheufele,et al. The science of science communication , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[38] D. Hine,et al. Audience segmentation and climate change communication: conceptual and methodological considerations , 2014 .
[39] Matthew C. Nisbet,et al. Understanding Public Opinion in Debates over Biomedical Research: Looking beyond Political Partisanship to Focus on Beliefs about Science and Society , 2014, PloS one.
[40] Rolf Lidskog,et al. Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust , 2014, Public understanding of science.
[41] S. Kristiansen,et al. Risk perception of nuclear energy after fukushima: stability and change in public opinion in Switzerland , 2016 .
[42] Barbara Kieslinger,et al. Supporting emerging forms of citizen science: a plea for diversity, creativity and social innovation , 2016 .
[44] Lars Guenther,et al. Promises and reservations towards science and technology among South African publics: A culture-sensitive approach , 2018, Public understanding of science.
[45] Mike S. Schäfer,et al. Global warming’s five Germanys: A typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information , 2017, Public understanding of science.
[46] J. Swim,et al. From Alarmed to Dismissive of Climate Change: A Single Item Assessment of Individual Differences in Concern and Issue Involvement , 2017 .
[47] Richard Fletcher,et al. Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis , 2018, New Media Soc..