Auditory responses to short-wavelength infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus

Pulsed Infrared laser is well-known for its high spatial resolution and contact-free stimulation mode. In order to improve the current auditory brainstem implants (ABI), 980 nm-short-wavelength infrared light was applied to stimulate the cochlear nucleus of rats. Single neural activity from contralateral inferior colliculus was recorded during laser stimulation. Animal experimental results showed that 980 nm laser could not directly activate neurons in cochlear nucleus and a photo-acoustic response was observed during stimulation, however, 980 nm laser produces an inhibitory effect on neural responses to sounds; After we added carbon nanoparticles onto the surface of animal cochlear nucleus, 980 nm laser could directly stimulate neurons and no interference between adjacent recording channels was observed. These findings indicated that with the enhancement of carbon nanoparticles, short-wavelength infrared neural stimulation (SW-INS) might be an effective method to overcome the defects of current ABIs. With this method, a new type of optical ABI with transcutaneous stimulating method is quite promising.

[1]  Nan Xia,et al.  Pulsed 808-nm infrared laser stimulation of the auditory nerve in guinea pig cochlea , 2013, Lasers in Medical Science.

[2]  Alexander C Thompson,et al.  Nanoparticle-enhanced infrared neural stimulation , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[3]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Auditory brainstem implants in neurofibromatosis Type 2. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  Anita Mahadevan-Jansen,et al.  Pulsed laser versus electrical energy for peripheral nerve stimulation , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  E. Honoré,et al.  The neuronal background K2P channels: focus on TREK1 , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Sangjin Yoo,et al.  Photothermal inhibition of neural activity with near-infrared-sensitive nanotransducers. , 2014, ACS nano.

[7]  Jonathan M. Cayce,et al.  Pulsed infrared light alters neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex in vivo , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Laser stimulation of auditory neurons: effect of shorter pulse duration and penetration depth. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Claus-Peter Richter,et al.  Acoustic Events and “Optophonic” Cochlear Responses Induced by Pulsed Near-Infrared LASER , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Kai Yang,et al.  Nano-graphene in biomedicine: theranostic applications. , 2013, Chemical Society reviews.

[11]  Sunil Pandey,et al.  Controlled delivery of dopamine hydrochloride using surface modified carbon dots for neuro diseases. , 2015, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[12]  C. Vincent,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Implants: How Do They Work? , 2012, Anatomical record.

[13]  Joseph T. Walsh,et al.  Optical stimulation of auditory neurons: Effects of acute and chronic deafening , 2008, Hearing Research.

[14]  Changsen Sun,et al.  980-nm infrared laser modulation of sodium channel kinetics in a neuron cell linearly mediated by photothermal effect , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  R V Shannon,et al.  Auditory Brainstem Implant: II. Postsurgical Issues and Performance , 1993, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  G. Hervieu,et al.  Distribution and expression of TREK-1, a two-pore-domain potassium channel, in the adult rat CNS , 2001, Neuroscience.

[17]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Auditory responses to electric and infrared neural stimulation of the rat cochlear nucleus , 2014, Hearing Research.

[18]  R. Shannon,et al.  Auditory brainstem implants for neurofibromatosis type 2 , 2012, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.