Effect of automatic image realignment on visuomotor coordination in simulated laparoscopic surgery.

During laparoscopic surgery, the surgeon's hand-eye coordination is often disrupted by the incongruent mapping between the orientation of the endoscopic view and the actual operative field. Two experiments were conducted to examine the effect of automatic image realignment on the performance of laparoscopic surgery. The first experiment investigated how visual-motor misalignment impacted laparoscopic surgery performance. Novice subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two paired viewing conditions in a simulated laparoscopic surgery environment: 1) the endoscope was either at the center of the modeled workspace with an optical axis of 90°, or at -45° from the midline of the subjects with an optical axis 45°; 2) the endoscope was either at 0°, or at 180° from the midline of the subjects, both with an optical axis of 45°. Each group of twelve subjects performed a dynamic point-and-touch task under the assigned pair of viewing conditions, each with eight image orientations, in a repeated-measures mixed design. The second experiment examined whether the automatic realigning mechanism that was activated mid-task (such that a congruent mapping between display and control was re-established if the mapping at the beginning of the task had been misaligned) was helpful to improve performance. Twelve novice subjects performed the same task as in the first experiment in a repeated-measures design. Performance was examined under three misaligned visuomotor mappings, each followed by the realigned mapping activated by the automatic realigning mechanism. Results showed that performance was best when the endoscopic image was perfectly aligned with the actual task space (0° image orientation), but degraded progressively as a function of deviation from perfect alignment. Subjects' performance maintained a consistent pattern across 8 image orientations regardless of optical axis orientation and endoscope location. Performance was improved with the automatic realigning mechanism. It is recommended that any solution to restore the visuomotor congruency in laparoscopic surgery should first align the image with the task space. This work has implications for the design of visualization systems in laparoscopic surgery.

[1]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[2]  C. S. Harris.  Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[3]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The Effect of Automated Compensation for Incongruent Axes on Teleoperator Performance , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[4]  H Bubb,et al.  Computer simulation for ergonomic improvements in laparoscopic surgery. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  D R Proffitt,et al.  The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[6]  Robert B. Welch,et al.  Multiple concurrent visual-motor mappings: implications for models of adaptation. , 1994 .

[7]  C. Cao,et al.  Using a dynamic training environment to acquire laparoscopic surgery skill , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[8]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Ergonomics of Task Performance in Endoscopic Surgery , 2008 .

[9]  R. Shepard,et al.  Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps , 1984, Cognition.

[10]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  J. Freyd,et al.  A velocity effect for representational momentum , 1985 .

[12]  P. Breedveld,et al.  Endoscopic camera rotation: a conceptual solution to improve hand-eye coordination in minimally-invasive surgery , 2000 .

[13]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Methods for improving performance under reverse alignment conditions during endoscopic surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  Won S. Kim,et al.  Three-dimensional tracking with misalignment between display and control axes , 1991 .

[15]  R. D. Easton,et al.  Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knowledge. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  L. Cooper,et al.  Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Gould,et al.  Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  J. Bharucha,et al.  Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  H. Cunningham.  Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Audrey K Bell,et al.  Innovative Dynamic Minimally Invasive Training Environment (DynaMITE) , 2007, Surgical innovation.

[21]  D. Kerzel.  Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization of the final position of a moving target , 2000, Vision Research.

[22]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Perspective and Stereoscopic Displays in Three-Axis Manual Tracking Tasks , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[23]  Karl Verfaillie,et al.  Representing and anticipating human actions in vision , 2002 .

[24]  A. Shah,et al.  The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  R. Finke,et al.  Mental extrapolation and representational momentum for complex implied motions. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Jose L Contreras-Vidal,et al.  Learning multiple visuomotor transformations: adaptation and context-dependent recall. , 2004, Motor control.

[27]  L. Cooper.  Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.