Two-Tone Suppression of Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Responses in the Cochlea.

Cochlear frequency tuning is based on a mildly tuned traveling-wave response that is enhanced in amplitude and sharpness by outer hair cell (OHC)-based forces. The nonlinear and active character of this enhancement is the fundamental manifestation of cochlear amplification. Recently, mechanical (pressure) and electrical (extracellular OHC-generated voltage) responses were simultaneously measured close to the sensory tissue's basilar membrane. Both pressure and voltage were tuned and showed traveling-wave phase accumulation, evidence that they were locally generated responses. Approximately at the frequency where nonlinearity commenced, the phase of extracellular voltage shifted up, to lead pressure by >1/4 cycle. Based on established and fundamental relationships among voltage, force, pressure, displacement, and power, the observed phase shift was identified as the activation of cochlear amplification. In this study, the operation of the cochlear amplifier was further explored, via changes in pressure and voltage responses upon delivery of a second, suppressor tone. Two different suppression paradigms were used, one with a low-frequency suppressor and a swept-frequency probe, the other with two swept-frequency tones, either of which can be considered as probe or suppressor. In the presence of a high-level low-frequency suppressor, extracellular voltage responses at probe-tone frequencies were greatly reduced, and the pressure responses were reduced nearly to their linear, passive level. On the other hand, the amplifier-activating phase shift between pressure and voltage responses was still present in probe-tone responses. These findings are consistent with low-frequency suppression being caused by the saturation of OHC electrical responses and not by a change in the power-enabling phasing of the underlying mechanics. In the two-tone swept-frequency suppression paradigm, mild suppression was apparent in the pressure responses, while deep notches could develop in the voltage responses. A simple analysis, based on a two-wave differencing scheme, was used to explore the observations.

[1]  B. P. Bogert,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of the Cochlea , 1950 .

[2]  M. A. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone suppression in inner hair cell responses: Correlates of rate suppression in the auditory nerve , 1992, Hearing Research.

[3]  A M Engebretson,et al.  Model for the nonlinear characteristics of cochlear potentials. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Saturation of outer hair cell receptor currents causes two-tone suppression , 1990, Hearing Research.

[5]  Elizabeth S. Olson,et al.  A family of fiber-optic based pressure sensors for intracochlear measurements , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[6]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. III. Basilar membrane motion , 1984, Hearing Research.

[7]  Wei Dong,et al.  In vivo impedance of the gerbil cochlear partition at auditory frequencies. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[8]  D. J Brown,et al.  Determinants of the spectrum of the neural electrical activity at the round window: transmitter release and neural depolarisation , 2004, Hearing Research.

[9]  E. Olson,et al.  Detection of cochlear amplification and its activation. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[10]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The modulation of the sensitivity of the mammalian cochlea by low frequency tones. I. Primary afferent activity , 1984, Hearing Research.

[11]  E S Olson,et al.  Intracochlear pressure measurements related to cochlear tuning. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Physiological correlates of off-frequency listening , 1992, Hearing Research.

[13]  N. Cooper,et al.  Two-tone suppression in cochlear mechanics. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  E. Olson Fast waves, slow waves and cochlear excitation , 2013 .

[15]  R. Chadwick,et al.  Dual traveling waves in an inner ear model with two degrees of freedom. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[16]  William S. Rhode,et al.  Two-tone suppression and distortion production on the basilar membrane in the hook region of cat and guinea pig cochleae , 1993, Hearing Research.

[17]  Marcel van der Heijden,et al.  The Spatial Buildup of Compression and Suppression in the Mammalian Cochlea , 2013, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[18]  John S Oghalai,et al.  Two-Dimensional Cochlear Micromechanics Measured In Vivo Demonstrate Radial Tuning within the Mouse Organ of Corti , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  E. Olson,et al.  Supporting evidence for reverse cochlear traveling waves. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  E. Olson,et al.  Observing middle and inner ear mechanics with novel intracochlear pressure sensors. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Two-tone interactions in the cochlear microphonic , 1982, Hearing Research.

[22]  Auditory Nerve Excitation via a Non-traveling Wave Mode of Basilar Membrane Motion , 2011, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  L. J. Black,et al.  THE COCHLEAR RESPONSE AS AN INDEX TO HEARING , 1936 .

[24]  W Hemmert,et al.  Limiting dynamics of high-frequency electromechanical transduction of outer hair cells. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  L. Robles,et al.  Two-tone suppression in the basilar membrane of the cochlea: mechanical basis of auditory-nerve rate suppression. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Olson,et al.  Intracochlear Scala Media Pressure Measurement: Implications for Models of Cochlear Mechanics. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Audrey K. Ellerbee,et al.  Noninvasive in vivo imaging reveals differences between tectorial membrane and basilar membrane traveling waves in the mouse cochlea , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Steven L. Jacques,et al.  A differentially amplified motion in the ear for near-threshold sound detection , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Two-compartment passive frequency domain cochlea model allowing independent fluid coupling to the tectorial and basilar membranes. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Ning Hu,et al.  Organ of Corti Potentials and the Motion of the Basilar Membrane , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  W. S. Rhode Mutual suppression in the 6 kHz region of sensitive chinchilla cochleae. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  G. Zweig,et al.  Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  R. Galamboš INHIBITION OF ACTIVITY IN SINGLE AUDITORY NERVE FIBERS BY ACOUSTIC STIMULATION , 1944 .

[34]  R. Chadwick,et al.  Phase of Shear Vibrations within Cochlear Partition Leads to Activation of the Cochlear Amplifier , 2014, PloS one.

[35]  P. Fahey,et al.  Nonlinear interactions that could explain distortion product interference response areas. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  C D Geisler,et al.  Two-tone suppression of basilar membrane vibrations in the base of the guinea pig cochlea using "low-side" suppressors. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Robert Fettiplace,et al.  Prestin-Driven Cochlear Amplification Is Not Limited by the Outer Hair Cell Membrane Time Constant , 2011, Neuron.