The Dissatisfaction of Having Your First Offer Accepted: The Role of Counterfactual Thinking in Negotiations

In this article, the authors explore the role of individuals’ counterfactual thoughts in determining their satisfaction with negotiated outcomes. When negotiators’ first offers are immediately accepted, negotiators are more likely to generate counterfactual thoughts about how they could have done better and therefore are less likely to be satisfied with the agreement than are negotiators whose offers are not accepted immediately. This reduction in satisfaction emerged even when the objective outcomes of negotiators whose first offers were immediately accepted were equal to or better than the outcomes of negotiators whose first offers were not immediately accepted. Evidence for a disconnect between objective outcomes and evaluations emerged in two scenario experiments and a simulated negotiation. The final experiment explored the functional and dysfunctional consequences of counterfactual activation following the immediate acceptance of first offers. Upward counterfactual thoughts were positively related to the amount of preparation for a subsequent negotiation; on the other hand, upward counterfactual thoughts were negatively correlated with the likelihood of making future first offers.

[1]  K. Markman,et al.  Downward Counterfactuals and Motivation: The Wake-Up Call and the Pangloss Effect , 2000 .

[2]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[3]  N. Roese,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking: The Intersection of Affect and Function , 1997 .

[4]  N. Lewis.  A dynamic theory of personality , 1935 .

[5]  K. Markman,et al.  The Mental Simulation of Better and Worse Possible Worlds , 1993 .

[6]  T. Wills.  Downward Comparison Principles in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[7]  L. Thompson,et al.  The impact of minimum goals and aspirations on judgments of success in negotiations , 1995 .

[8]  Lisa G. Aspinwall,et al.  Social Comparison, Stress, and Coping , 1990 .

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[10]  L. Sanna,et al.  Antecedents to Spontaneous Counterfactual Thinking: Effects of Expectancy Violation and Outcome Valence , 1996 .

[11]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation , 1991 .

[12]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won , 1990 .

[13]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  N. Roese,et al.  Affective Determinants of Counterfactual Thinking , 1997 .

[15]  R. Liebert,et al.  The effects of information and magnitude of initial offer on interpersonal negotiation , 1968 .

[16]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Counterfactual Thought, Regret, and Superstition: How to Avoid Kicking Yourself , 1995 .

[17]  V. Smith,et al.  Research in Experimental Economics , 1979 .

[18]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[19]  N. Roese,et al.  What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[20]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  When a coincidence is suspicious: the role of mental simulation , 1989 .

[21]  N. Roese.  Counterfactual thinking. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  James M. Olson,et al.  Outcome Controllability and Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .

[23]  A. Galinsky,et al.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  G. Wells,et al.  Mental Simulation of Causality , 1989 .

[25]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as behavioral primes: Priming the simulation heuristic and consideration of alternatives. , 2000 .

[26]  Jacob Beck,et al.  Adaptation-level theory. , 1974 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[28]  David M. Messick,et al.  A Reverse Outcome Bias: The Influence of Multiple Reference Points on the Evaluation of Outcomes and Decisions , 1995 .

[29]  H. Helson,et al.  Adaptation-level theory , 1964 .

[30]  L. Thompson.  Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. , 1990 .

[31]  G. Northcraft,et al.  Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring-and-adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions , 1987 .

[32]  S. Asch.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[33]  William Samuelson,et al.  I Won the Auction But Don't Want the Prize , 1983 .

[34]  Leigh Thompson,et al.  The bittersweet feeling of success: An examination of social perception in negotiation. , 1995 .

[35]  T. Tyler,et al.  Why People Obey the Law , 2021 .

[36]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  R. Thaler.  The Winner s Curse , 1991 .

[38]  Matthew N. McMullen.  Affective Contrast and Assimilation in Counterfactual Thinking , 1997 .

[39]  Victoria Husted Medvec,et al.  When doing better means feeling worse: The effects of categorical cutoff points on counterfactual thinking and satisfaction. , 1997 .

[40]  R. Oliver,et al.  Outcome Satisfaction in Negotiation: A Test of Expectancy Disconfirmation , 1994 .

[41]  N. Roese.  The Functional Basis of Counterfactual Thinking , 1994 .

[42]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Consequences of regret aversion: 2. Additional evidence for effects of feedback on decision making , 1997 .

[43]  T. Tyler,et al.  The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice , 1988 .

[44]  R. Sabatelli.  The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[45]  Christopher G. Davis,et al.  The Undoing of Traumatic Life Events , 1995 .

[46]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking and Victim Compensation , 1986 .

[47]  G. Yukl.  Effects of situational variables and opponent concessions on a bargainer's perception, aspirations, and concessions. , 1974 .

[48]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-being: Notes on the psychology of utility , 1991 .

[49]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases , 1982 .

[50]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  A. Galinsky,et al.  Counterfactuals as Self-Generated Primes: The Effect of Prior Counterfactual Activation on Person Perception Judgments , 2000 .

[52]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  Consequences of Regret Aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making , 1996 .

[53]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Counterfactuals , Causal Attributions , and the Hindsight Bias : A Conceptual Integration , 1996 .

[54]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[55]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: implications for blame assignment , 1990 .

[56]  L. Doob.  The psychology of social norms. , 1937 .

[57]  A. Tversky,et al.  The simulation heuristic , 1982 .

[58]  Margaret A. Neale,et al.  Effects of cognitive heuristics and goals on negotiator performance and subsequent goal setting , 1986 .

[59]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  Avoiding Regret in Decisions with Feedback: A Negotiation Example , 1995 .

[60]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  Dysfunctional implications of counterfactual thinking: When alternatives to reality fail us. , 1995 .

[61]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .