Scaffolded Learning of Bipedal Walkers: Bootstrapping Ontogenetic Development

Bipedal locomotion has several key challenges, such as balancing, foot placement, and gait optimization. We reach optimality from a very early age by using natural supports, such as our parent’s hands, chairs, and training wheels, and bootstrap a new knowledge from the recently acquired one. In this paper, we propose a scaffolded learning method from an evolutionary robotics perspective, where a biped creature achieves stable and independent bipedal walking while exploiting the natural scaffold of its changing morphology to create a third limb. Hence, we compare three conditions of scaffolded learning to reach bipedalism, and we prove that a performance-based scaffold is the most conducive to accelerate the learning of ontogenetic bipedal walking. Beyond a pedagogical experiment, this work presents a powerful tool to accelerate learning on robots.

[1]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Froude and the contribution of naval architecture to our understanding of bipedal locomotion. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[2]  S. Chaiklin The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction. , 2003 .

[3]  Giulio Sandini,et al.  Developmental robotics: a survey , 2003, Connect. Sci..

[4]  Benjamin Lok,et al.  Scaffolded learning with mixed reality , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[5]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Evolutionary Developmental Robotics: Improving Morphology and Control of Physical Robots , 2017, Artificial Life.

[6]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  The trade-off between morphology and control in the co-optimized design of robots , 2017, PloS one.

[7]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Posture and independent locomotion in early childhood: Learning to walk or learning dynamic postural control? , 1993 .

[8]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  An evolutionary approach to gait learning for four-legged robots , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[9]  Jerry E. Pratt,et al.  Virtual model control of a bipedal walking robot , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Laura A B Wilson,et al.  Ontogenetic changes in femoral cross-sectional geometry during childhood locomotor development. , 2020, American journal of physical anthropology.

[11]  E. Thelen,et al.  Hidden skills: a dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. , 1991, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[12]  Michael A Sherman,et al.  Simbody: multibody dynamics for biomedical research. , 2011, Procedia IUTAM.

[13]  Chee-Meng Chew,et al.  Virtual Model Control: An Intuitive Approach for Bipedal Locomotion , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Nobutoshi Yamazaki,et al.  Computer Simulation of the Ontogeny of Bipedal Walking , 1998 .

[15]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolution of central pattern generators for bipedal walking in a real-time physics environment , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[16]  S Grillner,et al.  Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. , 1985, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Yuko Susa,et al.  DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF INFANT LOCOMOTION , 1982 .

[18]  Md. Abdullah Al Mamun,et al.  Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments , 2020, Comput. Educ..